ScalingStacks

Proof. [0554]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The proof is rather standard and straightforward, which can be achieved by using separation of variables.

For the simplicity of notations, we denote

(6.43) d≡m+n≥3.d\equiv m+n\geq 3.

Let (r,Θ)∈ℝd(r,\Theta)\in\mathbb{R}^{d} be the polar coordinate system in ℝd\mathbb{R}^{d}, so the Laplacian of uu can be written as

(6.44) Δℝd​u=∂2u∂r2+d−1r⋅∂u∂r+1r2⋅Δ𝕊d−1​u.\Delta_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}u=\frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{d-1}{r}\cdot\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\cdot\Delta_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}u.

We make separation of variables on the punctured Euclidean space ℝd∖{0d}\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus\{0^{d}\}. Let

(6.45) λj≡j⁡(j+d−2),j∈ℕ,\lambda_{j}\equiv j(j+d-2),\ j\in\mathbb{N},

be the spectrum of the unit round sphere 𝕊d−1\mathbb{S}^{d-1}. Correspondingly, let φj∈C∞​(𝕊d−1)\varphi_{j}\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{d-1}) satisfy

(6.46) −Δ𝕊d−1​φj​(Θ)=λj​φj​(Θ).-\Delta_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}\varphi_{j}(\Theta)=\lambda_{j}\varphi_{j}(\Theta).

Then the function u⁡(r,Θ)u(r,\Theta) has the expansion along the fiber 𝕊d−1\mathbb{S}^{d-1},

(6.47) u⁡(r,Θ)=∑j=0∞uj​(r)⋅φj​(Θ).u(r,\Theta)=\sum\limits_{j=0}^{\infty}u_{j}(r)\cdot\varphi_{j}(\Theta).

Immediately, for each j∈ℕj\in\mathbb{N}, the coefficient function uj​(r)u_{j}(r) solves the Euler-Cauchy equation,

(6.48) uj′′​(r)+d−1r⋅uj′​(r)−1r2⋅λj⋅uj​(r)=0,u_{j}^{\prime\prime}(r)+\frac{d-1}{r}\cdot u_{j}^{\prime}(r)-\frac{1}{r^{2}}\cdot\lambda_{j}\cdot u_{j}(r)=0,

which has a general solution

(6.49) uj​(r)=Cj⋅rpj+Cj∗⋅rqj,u_{j}(r)=C_{j}\cdot r^{p_{j}}+C_{j}^{*}\cdot r^{q_{j}},

where pj=2−d+(d−2)2+4​λj2≥0p_{j}=\frac{2-d+\sqrt{(d-2)^{2}+4\lambda_{j}}}{2}\geq 0 and qj=2−d−(d−2)2+4​λj2<0q_{j}=\frac{2-d-\sqrt{(d-2)^{2}+4\lambda_{j}}}{2}<0 solve the quadratic equation

(6.50) w2+(d−2)​w−λj=0.w^{2}+(d-2)w-\lambda_{j}=0.

So it is obvious

p0\displaystyle p_{0} =0,q0=2−d≤−1,\displaystyle=0,\quad q_{0}=2-d\leq-1,
pj\displaystyle p_{j} ≥p1=1,\displaystyle\geq p_{1}=1,
(6.51) qj\displaystyle q_{j} ≤q1=1−d≤−2,j∈ℤ+.\displaystyle\leq q_{1}=1-d\leq-2,\quad j\in\mathbb{Z}_{+}.

In the following, we will show that, given the growth condition (6.42) for μp∈(−1,1)∖{0}\mu_{p}\in(-1,1)\setminus\{0\}, then for each j∈ℕj\in\mathbb{N} and for each r>0r>0, the coefficient uj​(r)u_{j}(r) satisfies

(6.52) |uj​(r)|≤Qjrμp,|u_{j}(r)|\leq\frac{Q_{j}}{r^{\mu_{p}}},

where Qj∈ℝQ_{j}\in\mathbb{R}. In fact, so it follows from the expansion (6.47) that for each j∈ℕj\in\mathbb{N},

(6.53) uj​(r)=∫𝕊d−1u⁡(r,Θ)⋅φj​dvol𝕊d−1,u_{j}(r)=\int_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}u(r,\Theta)\cdot\varphi_{j}\dvol_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}},

which implies

(6.54) |uj​(r)|≤|φj|L∞​(𝕊d−1)⋅∫𝕊d−11|x|μp​dvol𝕊d−1.|u_{j}(r)|\leq|\varphi_{j}|_{L^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{d-1})}\cdot\int_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}\frac{1}{|x|^{\mu_{p}}}\dvol_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}.

Next, we will write the above integral in the polar coordinates Θ≡(θ1,…,θd−1)\Theta\equiv(\theta_{1},\ldots,\theta_{d-1}) with θ1,…,θd−2∈[0,π]\theta_{1},\ldots,\theta_{d-2}\in[0,\pi] and θd−1∈[0,2​π]\theta_{d-1}\in[0,2\pi]. Denote by d​Θ≡d​θ1∧d​θ2∧…∧d​θd−1d\Theta\equiv d\theta_{1}\wedge d\theta_{2}\wedge\ldots\wedge d\theta_{d-1}, then it is by elementary calculations that, |x|=rm⋅∏k=1d−m|sin⁡θk||x|=r^{m}\cdot\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-m}|\sin\theta_{k}| and dvol𝕊d−1=∏k=1d−2(sind−k−1⁡θk)⋅d​Θ\dvol_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}=\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-2}(\sin^{d-k-1}\theta_{k})\cdot d\Theta. Therefore,

(6.55) ∫𝕊d−11|x|μp​dvol𝕊d−1=1rμp​∫𝒟Θ∏k=1d−2(sind−k−1⁡θk)∏k=1d−m|sin⁡θk|μp⋅𝑑Θ,\int_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}\frac{1}{|x|^{\mu_{p}}}\dvol_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}}=\frac{1}{r^{\mu_{p}}}\int_{\mathcal{D}_{\Theta}}\frac{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-2}(\sin^{d-k-1}\theta_{k})}{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-m}|\sin\theta_{k}|^{\mu_{p}}}\cdot d\Theta,

where 𝒟Θ≡{0≤θ1,…,θd−2≤π, 0≤θd−1≤2π}\mathcal{D}_{\Theta}\equiv\{0\leq\theta_{1},\ldots,\theta_{d-2}\leq\pi,\ 0\leq\theta_{d-1}\leq 2\pi\}. By assumption, μp∈(−1,1)∖{0}\mu_{p}\in(-1,1)\setminus\{0\}, then ∏k=1d−2(sind−k−1⁡θk)∏k=1d−m|sin⁡θk|μp\frac{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-2}(\sin^{d-k-1}\theta_{k})}{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-m}|\sin\theta_{k}|^{\mu_{p}}} is integrable in 𝒟Θ\mathcal{D}_{\Theta} and we denote

(6.56) ℐ0≡∫𝒟Θ∏k=1d−2(sind−k−1⁡θk)∏k=1d−m|sin⁡θk|μp⋅𝑑Θ.\mathcal{I}_{0}\equiv\int_{\mathcal{D}_{\Theta}}\frac{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-2}(\sin^{d-k-1}\theta_{k})}{\prod\limits_{k=1}^{d-m}|\sin\theta_{k}|^{\mu_{p}}}\cdot d\Theta.

Therefore, for each j∈ℕj\in\mathbb{N}, it holds that

(6.57) |uj​(r)|≤ℐ0⋅|φj|L∞​(𝕊d−1)rμp≡Qjrμp|u_{j}(r)|\leq\frac{\mathcal{I}_{0}\cdot|\varphi_{j}|_{L^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{d-1})}}{r^{\mu_{p}}}\equiv\frac{Q_{j}}{r^{\mu_{p}}}

for all r>0r>0.

Now we go back to the representation of uj​(r)u_{j}(r) in (6.49) and we analyze the growth behavior of function as r≪1r\ll 1 and r≫1r\gg 1. Applying the assumption μp∈(−1,1)∖{0}\mu_{p}\in(-1,1)\setminus\{0\} and the gap obtained in (6.51), we have that, for each j∈ℕj\in\mathbb{N}, Cj=Cj∗=0C_{j}=C_{j}^{*}=0. Therefore,

(6.58) u≡0​on​ℝm+n.u\equiv 0\ \text{on}\ \mathbb{R}^{m+n}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.