ScalingStacks

Proof. [053U]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

In the proof the constant C⁡(ν)C(\nu) may vary from line to line. First we prove Item (1). To start with, we prove the upper bound estimate for the solution Kν​(y)K_{\nu}(y). Notice that cosh⁡(t)≥1+t22\cosh(t)\geq 1+\frac{t^{2}}{2} for every t≥0t\geq 0, then

(5.50) Kν​(y)\displaystyle K_{\nu}(y) =\displaystyle= ∫0∞e−y​cosh⁡t​cosh⁡(ν​t)​𝑑t\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y\cosh t}\cosh(\nu t)dt
≤\displaystyle\leq ∫0∞e−y⁡(1+t22)​cosh⁡(ν​t)​𝑑t\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y(1+\frac{t^{2}}{2})}\cosh(\nu t)dt
=\displaystyle= e−y2​(∫0∞e−y​t22+ν​t​𝑑t+∫0∞e−y​t22−ν​t​𝑑t).\displaystyle\frac{e^{-y}}{2}\Big(\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}+\nu t}dt+\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}-\nu t}dt\Big).

Now we prove that, for y≥1y\geq 1 and ν∈ℝ\nu\in\mathbb{R},

(5.51) ∫0∞e−y​t22+ν​t​𝑑t≤C⁡(ν)⋅1y.\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}+\nu t}dt\leq C(\nu)\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}.

It is by straightforward computation that

(5.52) ∫0∞e−y​t22+ν​t​𝑑t\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}+\nu t}dt =\displaystyle= ∫0∞e−(y2​t−ν2​2y)2+ν22​y​𝑑t\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-(\sqrt{\frac{y}{2}}t-\frac{\nu}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2}{y}})^{2}+\frac{\nu^{2}}{2y}}dt
=\displaystyle= 2y⋅eν22​y∫−ν2​2y∞e−τ2dτ,\displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{2}{y}}\cdot e^{\frac{\nu^{2}}{2y}}\int_{-\frac{\nu}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2}{y}}}^{\infty}e^{-\tau^{2}}d\tau,

where τ=y2​t−ν2​2y\tau=\sqrt{\frac{y}{2}}t-\frac{\nu}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2}{y}}. Notice that

(5.53) ∫−ν2​2y∞e−τ2​𝑑τ≤∫−∞∞e−τ2​𝑑τ=π.\int_{-\frac{\nu}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2}{y}}}^{\infty}e^{-\tau^{2}}d\tau\leq\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\tau^{2}}d\tau=\sqrt{\pi}.

Moreover, the assumption y≥1y\geq 1 implies eν22​y≤eν22e^{\frac{\nu^{2}}{2y}}\leq e^{\frac{\nu^{2}}{2}}, so it holds that

(5.54) ∫0∞e−y​t22+ν​t​𝑑t≤C⁡(ν)⋅1y.\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}+\nu t}dt\leq C(\nu)\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}.

Similarly,

(5.55) ∫0∞e−y​t22−ν​t​𝑑t≤C⁡(ν)⋅1y.\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}-\nu t}dt\leq C(\nu)\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}.

Therefore, we have

(5.56) Kν​(y)≤C⁡(ν)⋅e−yy,K_{\nu}(y)\leq C(\nu)\cdot\frac{e^{-y}}{\sqrt{y}},

where C⁡(ν)>0C(\nu)>0 depends only on ν\nu.

Next we prove the lower bound estimate for Kν​(y)K_{\nu}(y). The integral representation of Kν​(y)K_{\nu}(y) can be written as follows,

(5.57) Kν​(y)\displaystyle K_{\nu}(y) =e−y2​(∫0∞e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)+ν​t​𝑑t+∫0∞e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)−ν​t​𝑑t).\displaystyle=\frac{e^{-y}}{2}\Big(\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)+\nu t}dt+\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)-\nu t}dt\Big).

We will give lower bound estimates for the above two integrals respectively. It is straightforward that

(5.58) ∫0∞e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)+ν​t​𝑑t≥∫01e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)+ν​t​𝑑t=∫01e−y⋅cosh⁡(θt)​t22+ν​t​𝑑t\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)+\nu t}dt\geq\int_{0}^{1}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)+\nu t}dt=\int_{0}^{1}e^{-\frac{y\cdot\cosh(\theta_{t})t^{2}}{2}+\nu t}dt

for some 0≤θt≤10\leq\theta_{t}\leq 1, which implies that

(5.59) ∫0∞e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)+ν​t​𝑑t≥∫01e−2​y​t2+ν​t​𝑑t.\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)+\nu t}dt\geq\int_{0}^{1}e^{-2yt^{2}+\nu t}dt.

The calculations in the last step imply that for y≥1y\geq 1,

(5.60) C−1​(ν)y≤∫01e−2​y​t2+ν​t≤C⁡(ν)y.\frac{C^{-1}(\nu)}{\sqrt{y}}\leq\int_{0}^{1}e^{-2yt^{2}+\nu t}\leq\frac{C(\nu)}{\sqrt{y}}.

Therefore,

(5.61) ∫01e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)+ν​t​𝑑t≥C−1​(ν)y.\int_{0}^{1}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)+\nu t}dt\geq\frac{C^{-1}(\nu)}{\sqrt{y}}.

By the same calculations,

(5.62) ∫01e−y⁡(cosh⁡t−1)−ν​t​𝑑t≥C−1​(ν)y.\int_{0}^{1}e^{-y(\cosh t-1)-\nu t}dt\geq\frac{C^{-1}(\nu)}{\sqrt{y}}.

This completes the proof of (5.47).

To see (5.48) we first assume y≥1y\geq 1. We use the integral representation

(5.63) Iν​(y)=1π​∫0πey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ−sin⁡(ν​π)π​∫0∞e−y​cosh⁡t−ν​t​𝑑t.I_{\nu}(y)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta-\frac{\sin(\nu\pi)}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y\cosh t-\nu t}dt.

To estimate the second term, we use the integral estimate

(5.64) ∫0∞e−y​cosh⁡t−ν​t​𝑑t≤e−y​∫0∞e−y​t22−ν​t​𝑑t≤C⁡(ν)⋅e−yy.\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y\cosh t-\nu t}dt\leq e^{-y}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{yt^{2}}{2}-\nu t}dt\leq C(\nu)\cdot\frac{e^{-y}}{\sqrt{y}}.

Next, we estimate the first term of Iν​(y)I_{\nu}(y). Since for every θ∈[0,π3]\theta\in[0,\frac{\pi}{3}],

(5.65) cos⁡θ≤1−θ22+θ424≤1−θ24,\cos\theta\leq 1-\frac{\theta^{2}}{2}+\frac{\theta^{4}}{24}\leq 1-\frac{\theta^{2}}{4},

then

(5.66) |1π​∫0πey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ|\displaystyle\Big|\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta\Big| ≤\displaystyle\leq 1π​∫0π3ey​cos⁡θ​𝑑θ+1π​∫π3πey​cos⁡θ​𝑑θ\displaystyle\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}}e^{y\cos\theta}d\theta+\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\frac{\pi}{3}}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}d\theta

Estimating the right hand side separately, we get

|1π​∫0πey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ|\displaystyle\Big|\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta\Big| ≤\displaystyle\leq eyπ​∫0π3e−y⋅θ24​𝑑θ+2​ey23≤2​eyπ⋅y+2​ey23≤10​eyy.\displaystyle\frac{e^{y}}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{3}}e^{-\frac{y\cdot\theta^{2}}{4}}d\theta+\frac{2e^{\frac{y}{2}}}{3}\leq\frac{2e^{y}}{\sqrt{\pi}\cdot\sqrt{y}}+\frac{2e^{\frac{y}{2}}}{3}\leq\frac{10e^{y}}{\sqrt{y}}.

Therefore,

(5.67) Iν​(y)≤10​eyy+C⁡(ν)⋅e−yy≤C⁡(ν)⋅eyy.I_{\nu}(y)\leq\frac{10e^{y}}{\sqrt{y}}+\frac{C(\nu)\cdot e^{-y}}{\sqrt{y}}\leq\frac{C(\nu)\cdot e^{y}}{\sqrt{y}}.

Now we assume y∈(0,1]y\in(0,1]. Since IνI_{\nu} is smooth, we only need to analyze the behavior of Iν​(y)I_{\nu}(y) as y→0y\to 0. By the definition of Iν​(y)I_{\nu}(y) we see if ν≥0\nu\geq 0 or ν\nu is a negative integer, limy→0Iν​(y)=0\lim\limits_{y\rightarrow 0}I_{\nu}(y)=0. For any ν<0\nu<0, we have

(5.68) limy→0Iν​(y)/(y2)νΓ⁡(ν+1)=1.\lim\limits_{y\to 0}I_{\nu}(y)\Big/\frac{(\frac{y}{2})^{\nu}}{\Gamma(\nu+1)}=1.

Therefore, for any y∈(0,1]y\in(0,1],

(5.69) Iν​(y)≤C⁡(ν)⋅yν.I_{\nu}(y)\leq C(\nu)\cdot y^{\nu}.

Now we prove Item (2). First we observe that by the definition of IνI_{\nu} using power series, when ν∈(−1,0)\nu\in(-1,0), Iν​(y)I_{\nu}(y) is positive for all y∈(0,∞)y\in(0,\infty). So the lower bound of IνI_{\nu} for y∈(0,1]y\in(0,1] follows just as before. Now we assume y≥1y\geq 1. To get the lower bound on IνI_{\nu}, it suffices to get the lower bound on the first term of (5.63). Suppose ν≠0\nu\neq 0, denote ην=min⁡(π,π3​|ν|)\eta_{\nu}=\min(\pi,\frac{\pi}{3|\nu|}), then we divide the integral into two parts

(5.70) ∫0πey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ=∫0ηνey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ+∫ηνπey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ.\int_{0}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta=\int_{0}^{\eta_{\nu}}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta+\int_{\eta_{\nu}}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta.

Since cos⁡θ≥1−θ22\cos\theta\geq 1-\frac{\theta^{2}}{2} we get

(5.71) ∫0ηνey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ≥12​ey​∫0ηνe−θ22​y​𝑑θ≥C⁡(ν)​eyy,\int_{0}^{\eta_{\nu}}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta\geq\frac{1}{2}e^{y}\int_{0}^{\eta_{\nu}}e^{-\frac{\theta^{2}}{2}y}d\theta\geq C(\nu)\frac{e^{y}}{\sqrt{y}},

and for the second term we have

(5.72) |∫ηνπey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ|≤∫ηνπey​cos⁡θ​𝑑θ≤(π−ην)​ecos⁡(ην)​y.\Big|\int_{\eta_{\nu}}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta\Big|\leq\int_{\eta_{\nu}}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}d\theta\leq(\pi-\eta_{\nu})e^{\cos(\eta_{\nu})y}.

So we get

(5.73) Iν​(y)≥C−1​(ν)​eyy.I_{\nu}(y)\geq C^{-1}(\nu)\frac{e^{y}}{\sqrt{y}}.

For ν=0\nu=0 the argument is similar. This completes the proof of Item (1).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.