ScalingStacks

Proof. [050T]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By Proposition 3.24, we write

(3.278) ψ\displaystyle\psi =𝔗1+𝔗2+𝔗3,\displaystyle=\FT_{1}+\FT_{2}+\FT_{3},
(3.279) 𝔗1\displaystyle\FT_{1} ≡−14​r​d​y∧d​y¯,\displaystyle\equiv\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r}dy\wedge d\bar{y},
(3.280) 𝔗2\displaystyle\FT_{2} ≡12​r​(y​d​y¯+y¯​d​y)∧Γ=O′​(1),\displaystyle\equiv\frac{1}{2r}(yd\bar{y}+\bar{y}dy)\wedge\Gamma=O^{\prime}(1),
(3.281) 𝔗3\displaystyle\FT_{3} ≡r⋅d​Γ+r−3​Π2(4)+O′​(r2)=O′​(r).\displaystyle\equiv r\cdot d\Gamma+r^{-3}\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r^{2})=O^{\prime}(r).

Immediately we have (𝔗1)2=(𝔗2)2=𝔗1∧𝔗2=0(\FT_{1})^{2}=(\FT_{2})^{2}=\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{2}=0 and for all k≥2k\geq 2, 𝔗2∧(𝔗3)k=(𝔗3)k=O′​(rk)\FT_{2}\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k}=(\FT_{3})^{k}=O^{\prime}(r^{k}). Moreover,

(3.282) 𝔗1∧𝔗3=−14​dy∧d​y¯∧d​Γ+−14​r4​dy∧d​y¯∧Π2(4)+O′​(r).\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{3}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge d\Gamma+\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r^{4}}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r).

Notice that −14​d​y∧d​y¯∧d​Γ\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge d\Gamma is a smooth term and by definition d​y∧d​y¯∧Π2(4)=0dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge\Pi_{2}^{(4)}=0, then

(3.283) 𝔗1∧𝔗3=O′​(r).\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{3}=O^{\prime}(r).

So for all k≥1k\geq 1,

(3.284) 𝔗1∧(𝔗3)k=O′​(rk).\FT_{1}\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k}=O^{\prime}(r^{k}).

Now by direct calculation,

(3.285) ψk=k⁡((𝔗1)∧(𝔗3)k−1+(𝔗2)∧(𝔗3)k−1)+(𝔗3)k.\displaystyle\psi^{k}=k\Big((\FT_{1})\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k-1}+(\FT_{2})\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k-1}\Big)+(\FT_{3})^{k}.

The conclusion then follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.