ScalingStacks

Proof. [04Y7]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

Proof.

By Corollary 4.6, the model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is snc along every one-dimensional stratum CC of ๐’ณ\mathscr{X}. By means of a finite sequence of blow-ups at zero-dimensional strata, we can moreover arrange that, for every prime component EE of ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} that contains CC, the intersection number (Cโ‹…E)(C\cdot E) is negative. This may destroy the property that ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} is reduced, but it preserves the properties that ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is snc along every one-dimensional stratum, ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is a good minimal dlt-model, and ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} satisfies assumption (2). Moreover, the sequence of blow-ups has no effect on the map ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}}, by [MN15, 3.1.7]; the effect on the skeleton ฮ”โก(๐’ณsnc)\Delta(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}) is a sequence of star subdivisions of the faces corresponding to the zero-dimensional strata [MN15, 3.1.9].

Thus it suffices to prove the theorem under the following alternative assumptions on the model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X}:

  • โ€ข

    ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is a good minimal dlt-model satisfying (2);

  • โ€ข

    for every one-dimensional stratum CC of ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k}, the model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is snc along CC;

  • โ€ข

    for every one-dimensional stratum CC of ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} and every prime component EE of ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} that contains CC, the component EE has multiplicity one in ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k}, and the intersection number (Cโ‹…E)(C\cdot E) is negative.

Let ZZ be the union of the faces of codimension โ‰ฅ2\geq 2 in ฮ”โก(๐’ณsnc)\Delta(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}). We will prove that ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}} is an nn-dimensional affinoid torus fibration over Skโก(X)โˆ–Z\mathrm{Sk}(X)\setminus Z.

Let CC be a one-dimensional stratum of ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k}. By adjunction, the model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is log Calabi-Yau along CC in the sense of (5). Thus ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is toric along CC, by Proposition 5.4. More precisely, The proof of Proposition 5.4 gives an explicit description of the formal completion ๐’ณ/C^\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/C}} of ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} along CC. Note that, under our assumptions and with the notations in that proof, the number ฮน\iota is equal to one and Nj=1N_{j}=1 for every jโˆˆJj\in J, so that we can make the construction of the fan ฮฃ\Sigma more explicit: we choose a bijection of JJ with {1,โ€ฆ,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}. Then we can take for (u0,โ€ฆ,unโˆ’1)(u_{0},\ldots,u_{n-1}) the standard basis of โ„คn\mathbb{Z}^{n}, and set un=0u_{n}=0. The vector vโˆžv_{\infty} is now given by (โˆ’1,b1,โ€ฆ,bnโˆ’1,Nโˆž)(-1,b_{1},\ldots,b_{n-1},N_{\infty}). Let ฮฃ\Sigma be the fan with maximal cones ฯƒ0\sigma_{0} and ฯƒโˆž\sigma_{\infty}. Then the toric scheme ๐’ด\mathscr{Y} constructed in the proof of Proposition 5.4 is precisely the torus embedding associated with ฮฃ\Sigma in the sense of Example 3.5.

Let UU be the union in ฮ”โก(๐’ณsnc)\Delta(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}) of the open faces corresponding to the strata c0c_{0}, cโˆžc_{\infty} and CC in ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k}. This is an open subset of Skโก(X)\mathrm{Sk}(X) and, as CC varies, these open sets cover Skโก(X)โˆ–Z\mathrm{Sk}(X)\setminus Z. Thus it suffices to show that ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}} is an nn-dimensional affinoid torus fibration over UU, and that the induced integral affine structure on UU is compatible with the piecewise integral affine structure on ฮ”โก(๐’ณsnc)\Delta(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}).

Set T=๐”พm,KnT=\mathbb{G}^{n}_{m,K} and let VV be the interior of the intersection of |ฮฃ||\Sigma| with โ„nร—{1}\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\{1\}. It follows directly from the construction of ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}} that ฯ๐’ณโˆ’1โ€‹(U)\rho_{\mathscr{X}}^{-1}(U) is the generic fiber of ๐’ณ/C^\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/C}}, and that the restriction of ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}} over UU only depends on the formal RR-scheme ๐’ณ/C^\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/C}}. If DD is the torus orbit in ๐’ดk\mathscr{Y}_{k} corresponding to the codimension one cone ฯƒ0โˆฉฯƒโˆž\sigma_{0}\cap\sigma_{\infty} in ฮฃ\Sigma, then we have shown in the proof of Proposition 5.4 that ๐’ณ/C^\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/C}} is isomorphic to ๐’ด/D^\widehat{\mathscr{Y}_{/D}}. Thus, by Example 3.5, we can identify the restriction of ฯ๐’ณ\rho_{\mathscr{X}} over UU with the restriction of ฯT\rho_{T} over VV, which is an nn-dimensional affinoid torus fibration by definition.

It remains to show that the induced integral affine structure on VV is compatible with the piecewise integral affine structure on UU. We will check this on the open face ฯ„0\tau_{0} corresponding to ฯƒ0\sigma_{0}; the result for ฯƒโˆž\sigma_{\infty} then follows by switching the roles of c0c_{0} and cโˆžc_{\infty}. We have labelled the rays of ฯƒ0\sigma_{0} by 0,โ€ฆ,n0,\ldots,n; this induces a labelling of the vertices of ฯ„0\tau_{0} and thus defines a system of barycentric coordinates (w0,โ€ฆ,wn)(w_{0},\ldots,w_{n}) on the nn-simplex ฯ„0\tau_{0}. By definition [MN15, 3.2.1], a real-valued function on a connected open subset of ฯ„0\tau_{0} is integral affine if we can write it as a degree one polynomial with โ„ค\mathbb{Z}-coefficients in the variables (w0/N0,w1,โ€ฆ,wn)(w_{0}/N_{0},w_{1},\ldots,w_{n}). This coincides with the notion of an integral affine function on the nn-simplex ฯƒ0โˆฉ(โ„nร—{1})\sigma_{0}\cap(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\{1\}), which is the convex hull of the points

(u0/N0,1),(u1,1),โ€ฆ,(un,1).(u_{0}/N_{0},1),\ (u_{1},1),\ldots,(u_{n},1).

This concludes the proof. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.