ScalingStacks

Proof. [04XX]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

We will argue by induction on the dimension of 𝒳\mathscr{X}. The case dim(𝒳)=1\dim(\mathscr{X})=1 follows at once from the fact that all strata of dlt pairs are normal [Ko13, 4.16(2)]. Thus we may assume that dim(𝒳)β‰₯2\dim(\mathscr{X})\geq 2, and that the result holds for pairs of strictly lower dimension.

Let xx be a point on CC. We claim that every prime divisor in DD that contains CC is Cartier at xx. Assuming the claim for now, it follows that CC is a local complete intersection at xx, and thus reduced because it is generically reduced (the pair (𝒳,D)(\mathscr{X},D) is snc at the generic point of CC). Now it follows from [Ko13, 4.16(2)] that CC is normal, and thus regular since it is of dimension one. But CC is defined by the local equations at xx of the prime components of DD that contain CC; these local equations form a regular sequence, again by [Ko13, 4.16(2)]. We conclude that locally at xx, the scheme 𝒳\mathscr{X} is regular and DD is a strict normal crossings divisor.

Thus it suffices to prove our claim. We may assume that xx is not a zero-dimensional stratum of DD, since at such points, the pair (𝒳,D)(\mathscr{X},D) is snc by the definition of a dlt pair. Let EE be a prime divisor in DD that contains CC. Let F1,…,FrF_{1},\ldots,F_{r} be the non-empty intersections of EE with the other components of DD, and set Ξ”=F1+…+Fr\Delta=F_{1}+\ldots+F_{r}. Then the pair (E,Ξ”)(E,\Delta) is dlt, and

KE+Ξ”=(K𝒳+D)|EK_{E}+\Delta=(K_{\mathscr{X}}+D)|_{E}

is Cartier (see Proposition 4.5 and Claim 4.16.4 in [Ko13]). By the induction hypothesis, EE is regular at xx.

Let mβ‰₯1m\geq 1 be the index of EE at xx, that is, the smallest positive integer such that m​EmE is Cartier at xx. Working locally around xx, we may assume that EE is regular and that π’ͺ𝒳​(m​E)\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{X}}(mE) is a trivial line bundle. The choice of a trivialisation determines a ramified ΞΌm\mu_{m}-cover h:𝒳~→𝒳h\colon\widetilde{\mathscr{X}}\to\mathscr{X} defined by

𝒳~=Spec𝒳​⨁a=0mπ’ͺ𝒳​(βˆ’a​E).\widetilde{\mathscr{X}}=\mathrm{Spec}\,_{\mathscr{X}}\bigoplus_{a=0}^{m}\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{X}}(-aE).

Here π’ͺ𝒳​(βˆ’a​E)\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{X}}(-aE) is the rank one reflexive sheaf associated with the Weil divisor βˆ’a​E-aE. This is the so-called index one cover of the pair (𝒳,E)(\mathscr{X},E) at the point xx; see [KM98, 2.52] for details. The morphism hh is Γ©tale over all the points where EE is Cartier; in particular, it is Γ©tale over all the codimension one points of EE, since 𝒳\mathscr{X} is regular in codimension two by Lemma 4.2. The minimality of mm implies that the inverse image of xx in 𝒳~\widetilde{\mathscr{X}} consists of a unique point, which we denote by x~\widetilde{x}.

We write E~\widetilde{E} for the inverse image of EE on 𝒳~\widetilde{\mathscr{X}}, and D~\widetilde{D} for the inverse image of the divisor DD. By [KM98, 5.20], the pair (𝒳~,D~)(\widetilde{\mathscr{X}},\widetilde{D}) is log canonical, and mldx~​(𝒳~,D~)\mathrm{mld}_{\widetilde{x}}(\widetilde{\mathscr{X}},\widetilde{D}) is positive. Since we chose xx on a one-dimensional stratum CC, the divisor DD has dim(𝒳)βˆ’1\dim(\mathscr{X})-1 irreducible components that pass through xx. This implies that E~\widetilde{E} is unibranch at x~\widetilde{x}. Otherwise, Γ©tale-locally around x~\widetilde{x}, the divisor D~\widetilde{D} would have at least dim(𝒳)\dim(\mathscr{X}) components passing through x~\widetilde{x}, and x~\widetilde{x} would be their intersection; but this implies that x~\widetilde{x} is a log canonical center of (X~,D~)(\widetilde{X},\widetilde{D}), by [Ko13, 4.41(2)], contradicting the positivity of mldx~​(𝒳~,D~)\mathrm{mld}_{\widetilde{x}}(\widetilde{\mathscr{X}},\widetilde{D}).

We denote by E~β€²\widetilde{E}^{\prime} the normalization of E~\widetilde{E}. Since E~\widetilde{E} is unibranch at x~\widetilde{x}, there is a unique point x~β€²\widetilde{x}^{\prime} on E~β€²\widetilde{E}^{\prime} that lies above x~∈E~\widetilde{x}\in\widetilde{E}. We have already observed that the morphism E~β†’E\widetilde{E}\to E induced by hh is Γ©tale in codimension one; then the normality of EE implies that E~\widetilde{E} is normal in codimension one. Thus E~β€²β†’E\widetilde{E}^{\prime}\to E is also Γ©tale in codimension one. Since EE is regular, the purity of the branch locus now implies that the finite morphism E~β€²β†’E\widetilde{E}^{\prime}\to E is Γ©tale at x~β€²\widetilde{x}^{\prime}; but x~β€²\widetilde{x}^{\prime} is the unique point that lies above x∈Ex\in E, so that E~β€²β†’E\widetilde{E}^{\prime}\to E, and hence E~β†’E\widetilde{E}\to E, are isomorphisms. We finally conclude that m=1m=1, so that EE is Cartier at xx. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.