Proof. [04L4]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
One uses the same arguments as in the proof of Proposition 6.9. Suppose there is an extension of to a smooth Lagrangian fibration defined on a neighborhood of such that . Then one may compute the period lattice of ; this gives a smooth function extending the function in Proposition 6.23. Assuming that also has been extended to so that , one may verify that the period map gives the required equivalence between and where .
To extend , notice that is smooth so, tautologically, is an extension of to . It remains to extend away from . Let and define as in (62). Denote and by its quotient with the reduced fibration. Then is a smooth Lagrangian cylinder fibration.
The coisotropic neighborhood theorem allows us to identify a neighborhood of inside with a neighborhood of inside ( will denote the coordinate). Moreover, since can be identified with (see Remark 6.24), can be identified with a subset of of the type for some positive (see Example 6.25). The pullback of under these identifications gives a piecewise smooth Lagrangian fibration on
| (68) |
where , and is the restriction to of a map. The set where is smooth, corresponds (under the above identifications) to the interior of which we denote , where . Notice that the map above is then smooth along , in particular the Taylor expansions in of and coincide along . With the same arguments used in the proper case one can show that can be smoothly extended to a Lagrangian fibration beyond (cf. Proposition 6.9 above, or [2] Proposition 6.3 for more details). In fact with a little more care one can do this so that along , where an extension already exists, namely itself, we have . The map gives the required extension of , where the last observation guarantees that . ∎