Proof. [02YJ]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
By Corollary 5.17, we have . By equation (3.49), we have . Statement (2) follows readily from this and from the expression for in Lemma 8.17.
The function is strictly concave on , because is an ample line bundle. Hence and this is the fan described in statement (1).
Let be the dual basis of induced by the basis of . By Proposition 3.64 and statement (2), we have
Statement (3) follows readily from this.
For the first part of statement (4), it suffices to compute the Legendre-Fenchel dual of at a point in the interior of the polytope. Lemma 8.17 shows that is strictly concave. Hence, by Theorem 3.52(3), is a homeomorphism between and . Thus, there exist a unique such that, for and ,
We use the conventions , , and as before, and also and , so that . Computing the gradient of , we obtain, for and ,
Combining these expressions, we obtain, for and ,
From the case we deduce and from the case it results . From this, one can verify
From Theorem 3.52(4), we have . Inserting the expressions above for , and in terms of , we obtain the stated formula.
For , we have . The last statement follows from Example 3.16. ∎