ScalingStacks

Proof. [02UX]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

It is clear that

div⁡(t)=D0−D∞+∑i=0kai​Ei+∑j∈Θiai,j​Fi,j\operatorname{div}(t)=D_{0}-D_{\infty}+\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{i}E_{i}+\sum_{j\in\Theta_{i}}a_{i,j}F_{i,j}

for certain coefficients aia_{i} and ai,ja_{i,j} that we want to determine as much as possible.

If a component EE of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}, with coefficient aa, does not meet D0D_{0} nor D∞D_{\infty}, but meets r≥1r\geq 1 other components, and the coefficients of r−1r-1 of these components are equal to aa, while the coefficient of the remaining component is bb, we obtain that

0=div⁡(t)⋅E=a​E⋅E+a⁡(r−1)+b=−r​a+a⁡(r−1)+b=b−a0=\operatorname{div}(t)\cdot E=aE\cdot E+a(r-1)+b=-ra+a(r-1)+b=b-a

Thus b=ab=a. Starting with the components Fi,jF_{i,j} that are terminal, we deduce that, for all ii and j∈Θij\in\Theta_{i}, ai=ai,ja_{i}=a_{i,j}. Therefore,

div⁡(t)=D0−D∞+∑i=0kai​(Ei+∑j∈ΘiFi,j).\operatorname{div}(t)=D_{0}-D_{\infty}+\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{i}\left(E_{i}+\sum_{j\in\Theta_{i}}F_{i,j}\right).

In particular, the lemma is proved for k=0k=0. Assume now that k>0k>0.

It only remains to show that ai=a0−ia_{i}=a_{0}-i, that we prove by induction. For i=1i=1, we compute

0=div⁡(t)⋅E0=D0⋅E0+a0​E0⋅E0+a0​∑j∈Θ0F0,j⋅E0+a1​E1⋅E0=1−a0+a1.0=\operatorname{div}(t)\cdot E_{0}=D_{0}\cdot E_{0}+a_{0}E_{0}\cdot E_{0}+a_{0}\sum_{j\in\Theta_{0}}F_{0,j}\cdot E_{0}+a_{1}E_{1}\cdot E_{0}=1-a_{0}+a_{1}.

Thus a1=a0−1a_{1}=a_{0}-1. For 1<i≤k1<i\leq k, by induction hypothesis, ai−1=ai−2−1a_{i-1}=a_{i-2}-1. Then

0=div⁡(t)⋅Ei−1=ai−2−2​ai−1+ai=1−ai−1+ai.0=\operatorname{div}(t)\cdot E_{i-1}=a_{i-2}-2a_{i-1}+a_{i}=1-a_{i-1}+a_{i}.

Thus ai=ai−1−1=a0−ia_{i}=a_{i-1}-1=a_{0}-i, proving the lemma. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.