ScalingStacks

Proof. [02U8]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The tensor product s⊗es^{\otimes e} defines a rational section of ℒ{\mathcal{L}}. Let Λ∈Π\Lambda\in\Pi and choose mΛ∈Mm_{\Lambda}\in M, lΛ∈ℤl_{\Lambda}\in\mathbb{Z} such that e​ψ|Λ=mΛ+lΛ|Λe\psi|_{\Lambda}=m_{\Lambda}+l_{\Lambda}|_{\Lambda}. Let u∈Λu\in\Lambda and p∈XΣanp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\Sigma} with u=val⁡(p)u={\operatorname{val}}(p). Then red⁡(p)∈𝒳Λ{\operatorname{red}}(p)\in{\mathcal{X}}_{\Lambda}. But in 𝒳Λ{\mathcal{X}}_{\Lambda} the section χmΛ​ϖlΛ​s⊗e\chi^{m_{\Lambda}}\varpi^{l_{\Lambda}}s^{\otimes e} is regular and non-vanishing. Therefore, by Definition 2.17,

‖χmΛ​(p)​ϖlΛ​s⊗e​(p)‖ℒ=1.\|\chi^{m_{\Lambda}}(p)\varpi^{l_{\Lambda}}s^{\otimes e}(p)\|_{{\mathcal{L}}}=1.

Thus

ψ∥⋅∥ℒ(u)\displaystyle\psi_{\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{L}}}}(u) =1λK​log⁡(‖s⁡(p)‖ℒ)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{\lambda_{K}}\log(\|s(p)\|_{{\mathcal{L}}})
=1e​λK​log⁡(|χ−mΛ​(p)​ϖ−lΛ|)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{e\lambda_{K}}\log(|\chi^{-m_{\Lambda}}(p)\varpi^{-l_{\Lambda}}|)
=1e​(⟨mΛ,u⟩+lΛ)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{e}(\langle m_{\Lambda},u\rangle+l_{\Lambda})
=ψ⁡(u).\displaystyle=\psi(u).

Therefore ψ\psi agrees with the function associated to the metric ∥⋅∥ℒ\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{L}}}. Hence ψ−Ψ\psi-\Psi extends to a continuous function on NΣN_{\Sigma} and the metric ∥⋅∥ψ\|\cdot\|_{\psi} agrees with ∥⋅∥ℒ\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{L}}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.