Let be the function
introduced in (3.20). For each write
. Let be as in Definition 3.23. By
Lemma 3.24,
|
|
|
Write . Then
.
We claim that, for each ,
|
|
|
Let . Clearly and,
since , the set is non-empty. Let . Then, for each , . Therefore,
|
|
|
Conversely, let satisfying and
. On the one hand, by
the properties of the function , we have . On
the other hand, since ,
|
|
|
Thus and finally . This
implies that, if then , showing
. Hence the claim is proved.
By definition . Hence . For each ,
write
|
|
|
Then . The result
follows from the previous claim and the fact that
by (3.62).
∎