ScalingStacks

Proof. [02MP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Let Pf​(u,x)=f⁡(u)+f∨​(x)−⟨u,x⟩P_{f}(u,x)=f(u)+f^{\vee}(x)-\left<u,x\right> be the function introduced in (3.20). For each x∈stab⁡(f)x\in\operatorname{stab}(f) write Pf,x​(u)=P⁡(u,x)P_{f,x}(u)=P(u,x). Let CxC_{x} be as in Definition 3.23. By Lemma 3.24,

Cx={u∈dom⁡(f)∣Pf,x​(u)=0}.C_{x}=\{u\in{\operatorname{dom}}(f)\mid P_{f,x}(u)=0\}.

Write P′​(v)=rec⁡(f)​(v)−⟨u,x⟩P^{\prime}(v)=\operatorname{rec}(f)(v)-\left<u,x\right>. Then P′=rec⁡(Pf,x)P^{\prime}=\operatorname{rec}(P_{f,x}).

We claim that, for each x∈stab⁡(f)x\in\operatorname{stab}(f),

rec⁡(Cx)={v∈dom⁡(rec⁡(f))∣P′​(v)=0}.\operatorname{rec}(C_{x})=\{v\in{\operatorname{dom}}(\operatorname{rec}(f))\mid P^{\prime}(v)=0\}.

Let v∈rec⁡(Cx)v\in\operatorname{rec}(C_{x}). Clearly v∈dom⁡(rec⁡(f))v\in{\operatorname{dom}}(\operatorname{rec}(f)) and, since x∈stab⁡(f)x\in\operatorname{stab}(f), the set CxC_{x} is non-empty. Let u0∈Cxu_{0}\in C_{x}. Then, for each λ>0\lambda>0, u0+λ​v∈Cxu_{0}+\lambda v\in C_{x}. Therefore,

P′​(v)=limλ→∞Pf,x​(u0+λ​v)−Pf,x​(u0)λ=0.P^{\prime}(v)=\lim_{\lambda\to\infty}\frac{P_{f,x}(u_{0}+\lambda v)-P_{f,x}(u_{0})}{\lambda}=0.

Conversely, let v∈dom⁡(rec⁡(f))v\in{\operatorname{dom}}(\operatorname{rec}(f)) satisfying P′​(v)=0P^{\prime}(v)=0 and u∈Cxu\in C_{x}. On the one hand, by the properties of the function PfP_{f}, we have Pf,x​(u+v)≤0P_{f,x}(u+v)\leq 0. On the other hand, since P′=rec⁡(Pf,x)P^{\prime}=\operatorname{rec}(P_{f,x}),

Pf,x​(u+v)−Pf,x​(u)≥P′​(v)=0.P_{f,x}(u+v)-P_{f,x}(u)\geq P^{\prime}(v)=0.

Thus Pf,x​(u+v)≥Pf,x​(u)=0P_{f,x}(u+v)\geq P_{f,x}(u)=0 and finally Pf,x​(u+v)=0P_{f,x}(u+v)=0. This implies that, if u∈Cxu\in C_{x} then u+v∈Cxu+v\in C_{x}, showing v∈rec⁡(Cx)v\in\operatorname{rec}(C_{x}). Hence the claim is proved.

By definition Π⁡(f)={Cx}x∈stab⁡(f)\Pi(f)=\{C_{x}\}_{x\in\operatorname{stab}(f)}. Hence rec⁡(Π⁡(f))={rec⁡(Cx)}x∈stab⁡(f)\operatorname{rec}(\Pi(f))=\{\operatorname{rec}(C_{x})\}_{x\in\operatorname{stab}(f)}. For each x∈stab⁡(rec⁡(f))x\in\operatorname{stab}(\operatorname{rec}(f)), write

Cx′={v∈dom⁡(rec⁡(f))∣P′​(v)=0}.C^{\prime}_{x}=\{v\in{\operatorname{dom}}(\operatorname{rec}(f))\mid P^{\prime}(v)=0\}.

Then Π⁡(rec⁡(f))={Cx′}x∈stab⁡(rec⁡(f))\Pi(\operatorname{rec}(f))=\{C^{\prime}_{x}\}_{x\in\operatorname{stab}(\operatorname{rec}(f))}. The result follows from the previous claim and the fact that stab⁡(f)=stab⁡(rec⁡(f))\operatorname{stab}(f)=\operatorname{stab}(\operatorname{rec}(f)) by (3.62). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.