Application to dynamical systems [01KK]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Application to dynamical systems
Let us assume that and are the metrized line bundles and attached to rational functions and of degres and respectively, with and . Let us write and for the height relative to these metrized line bundles ; we call them the canonical heights. The isometry and the functorial properties of the height imply that for any , and . In particular, preperiodic points for (i.e., points with finite forward orbit) satisfy . Moreover,
hence since . Similarly, preperiodic points of satisfy , and .
In the arithmetic case, or over function fields over a finit field, Northcott’s finiteness theorem implies easily that points such that are preperiodic for , and similarly for . This is not true in general : for example, if is constant, all constant points have height but only countably many of them are preperiodic ; more generally isotrivial rational functions, i.e. rational functions which are constant after conjugacy by an automorphism of will furnish counterexamples. The best known result is restricted to (non-isotrivial) polynomials : by Benedetto [10], a point of height zero is then preperiodic ; the proof relies on a detailed analysis of the Julia set.
Let us show how Prop. 3.4.1 implies results of Baker and DeMarco [4], and of Petsche, Szpiro and Tucker [45].
Proposition 3.4.3.
In the geometric case, let us assume that is non-isotrivial ; if is a function field over an infinite field, let us moreover assume that it is a polynomial. The following are then equivalent :
- (1)
the heights and coincide ;
- (2)
and have infinitely many common preperiodic points ;
- (3)
the essential lowest bound of is zero ;
- (4)
the equilibrium measures and are equal at all places ;
- (5)
the metrized line bundles and are isomorphic, up to a family of constants such that .
Démonstration.
The arguments are more or less formal from Prop. 3.4.1 ; let us detail them anyway for the sake of the reader.
1)2). Like any rational map, has infinitely many preperiodic points in , and they satisfy . If , then they also satisfy . Under the assumptions of the proposition, they are preperiodic for .
2)3) is obvious, for common preperiodic points of and satisfy /.
3)4). By Prop. 3.4.1, the line bundle has the constant metric at all places. In particular, the local measures and coincide at all places.
4)5). Let be a non zero global section of . For any place , ; one has , hence . By the maximum principle of [51], is constant. Moreover,
5)1). This is obvious. ∎