ScalingStacks

Application to dynamical systems [01KK]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Application to dynamical systems

Let us assume that L¯\overline{L} and M¯\overline{M} are the metrized line bundles 𝒪⁡(1)¯φ\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi} and 𝒪⁡(1)¯ψ\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\psi} attached to rational functions φ\varphi and ψ\psi of degres dd and ee respectively, with d≥2d\geq 2 and e≥2e\geq 2. Let us write hφh_{\varphi} and hψh_{\psi} for the height relative to these metrized line bundles ; we call them the canonical heights. The isometry φ∗​𝒪⁡(1)¯φ≃𝒪⁡(1)¯φd\varphi^{*}\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi}\simeq\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi}^{d} and the functorial properties of the height imply that for any x∈𝐏1​(F¯)x\in{\mathbf{P}}^{1}(\overline{F}), hφ​(φ⁡(x))=d​hφ​(x)h_{\varphi}(\varphi(x))=dh_{\varphi}(x) and hψ​(ψ⁡(x))=e​hψ​(x)h_{\psi}(\psi(x))=eh_{\psi}(x). In particular, preperiodic points for φ\varphi (i.e., points with finite forward orbit) satisfy hφ​(x)=0h_{\varphi}(x)=0. Moreover,

d2​(c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|𝐏1)=(c^1​(φ∗​𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|𝐏1)=(c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|φ∗​𝐏1)=d⁡(c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|𝐏1),d^{2}({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|{\mathbf{P}}^{1})=({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\varphi^{*}\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|{\mathbf{P}}^{1})=({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|\varphi_{*}{\mathbf{P}}^{1})=d({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|{\mathbf{P}}^{1}),

hence (c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|𝐏1)=0({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|{\mathbf{P}}^{1})=0 since d≠0,1d\neq 0,1. Similarly, preperiodic points of ψ\psi satisfy hψ​(x)=0h_{\psi}(x)=0, and (c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯ψ)2|𝐏1)=0({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\psi})^{2}|{\mathbf{P}}^{1})=0.

In the arithmetic case, or over function fields over a finit field, Northcott’s finiteness theorem implies easily that points xx such that hφ​(x)=0h_{\varphi}(x)=0 are preperiodic for φ\varphi, and similarly for ψ\psi. This is not true in general : for example, if φ\varphi is constant, all constant points have height 00 but only countably many of them are preperiodic ; more generally isotrivial rational functions, i.e. rational functions which are constant after conjugacy by an automorphism of 𝐏1{\mathbf{P}}^{1} will furnish counterexamples. The best known result is restricted to (non-isotrivial) polynomials : by Benedetto [10], a point of height zero is then preperiodic ; the proof relies on a detailed analysis of the Julia set.

Let us show how Prop. 3.4.1 implies results of Baker and DeMarco [4], and of Petsche, Szpiro and Tucker [45].

Proposition 3.4.3.

In the geometric case, let us assume that ψ\psi is non-isotrivial ; if FF is a function field over an infinite field, let us moreover assume that it is a polynomial. The following are then equivalent :

  1. (1)

    the heights hφh_{\varphi} and hψh_{\psi} coincide ;

  2. (2)

    φ\varphi and ψ\psi have infinitely many common preperiodic points ;

  3. (3)

    the essential lowest bound of hφ+hψh_{\varphi}+h_{\psi} is zero ;

  4. (4)

    the equilibrium measures μφ\mu_{\varphi} and μψ\mu_{\psi} are equal at all places ;

  5. (5)

    the metrized line bundles 𝒪​(1)φ\mathscr{O}(1)_{\varphi} and 𝒪​(1)ψ\mathscr{O}(1)_{\psi} are isomorphic, up to a family of constants (cv)(c_{v}) such that ∏cv=1\prod c_{v}=1.

Démonstration.

The arguments are more or less formal from Prop. 3.4.1 ; let us detail them anyway for the sake of the reader.

1)⇒\Rightarrow2). Like any rational map, φ\varphi has infinitely many preperiodic points in 𝐏1​(F¯){\mathbf{P}}^{1}(\overline{F}), and they satisfy hφ​(x)=0h_{\varphi}(x)=0. If hφ=hψh_{\varphi}=h_{\psi}, then they also satisfy hψ​(x)=0h_{\psi}(x)=0. Under the assumptions of the proposition, they are preperiodic for ψ\psi.

2)⇒\Rightarrow3) is obvious, for common preperiodic points of φ\varphi and ψ\psi satisfy hφ​(x)+hψ​(x)=0h_{\varphi}(x)+h_{\psi}(x)=0/.

3)⇒\Rightarrow4). By Prop. 3.4.1, the line bundle 𝒪​(1)φ−𝒪​(1)ψ\mathscr{O}(1)_{\varphi}-\mathscr{O}(1)_{\psi} has the constant metric at all places. In particular, the local measures μφ\mu_{\varphi} and μψ\mu_{\psi} coincide at all places.

4)⇒\Rightarrow5). Let ss be a non zero global section of 𝒪⁡(1)\mathscr{O}(1). For any place vv, fv=log⁡(‖s‖v,φ/‖s‖v,ψ)f_{v}=\log(\left\|{s}\right\|_{v,\varphi}/\left\|{s}\right\|_{v,\psi}) ; one has μv,ψ−μv,φ=ddc⁡fv\mu_{v,\psi}-\mu_{v,\varphi}=\mathop{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}}f_{v}, hence ddc⁡fv=0\mathop{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}}f_{v}=0. By the maximum principle of [51], fvf_{v} is constant. Moreover,

0=(c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯ψ)2|X)=(c^1​(𝒪⁡(1)¯φ)2|X)+∑vlog⁡cv=∑vlog⁡cv.0=({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\psi})^{2}|X)=({\widehat{c}}_{1}(\overline{\mathscr{O}(1)}_{\varphi})^{2}|X)+\sum_{v}\log c_{v}=\sum_{v}\log c_{v}.

5)⇒\Rightarrow1). This is obvious. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.