The arithmetic Hodge index theorem [01KF]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
The arithmetic Hodge index theorem
Let be a projective smooth curve over , let be a line bundle of degree on , with an admissible metric. Let be the same line bundle with the canonical metric : if has genus , this is the metric induced by an embedding of into its Jacobian, if is of genus , then is the trivial metrized line bundle. The metrized line bundle is the trivial line bundle, together with an admissible metric which is given by a function at the place of .
A formula of Faltings–Hriljac expresses as twice minus the Néron–Tate height of the point of corresponding to . More generally,
where for each ,
is the Dirichlet energy of . This is a non positive quadratic form which vanishes if and only if is constant. For more details, I refer to [15] at archimedean places and [51] at ultrametric places. (When has genus , and the term has to be interpreted as .)
As a consequence, . Let us analyse the case of equality. Since they are nonpositive, all terms in the formula above have to vanish. Consequently, is a torsion point in the Jacobian, and all functions are constant. We will say that some power of is constant
Proposition 3.4.1.
Let be a number field, let be a projective smooth curve over . Let and be two admissible metrized line bundles over . Assume that , are positive. and . Then, the essential minimum of satisfies the following inequality :
Moreover, the right hand side of this inequality is always nonnegative and vanishes if and only if some power of is constant.
Démonstration.
By Zhang’s inequality (see [18]), one has
Since by assumption, we observe that
This shows the first claim.
Since and have the same degree, viz. , the rest of the proposition follows from the negativity properties of the height recalled above. ∎