ScalingStacks

2.5. Abelian varieties [01JU]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.5. Abelian varieties

Let us assume throughout this section that X\mathrm{X} is an Abelian variety. For any integer mm, let [m][m] be the multiplication-by-mm endomorphism of X\mathrm{X}.

Canonical metrics

Let LL be a line bundle on X\mathrm{X}. Let 00 be the neutral element of X\mathrm{X} and let us fix a trivialization L0L_{0} of LL at 00.

The line bundle L⊗2L^{\otimes 2} is canonically decomposed as the tensor product of an even and an odd line bundle :

L⊗2=(L⊗[−1]∗​L)⊗(L⊗[−1]∗​L−1).L^{\otimes 2}=(L\otimes[-1]^{*}L)\otimes(L\otimes[-1]^{*}L^{-1}).

By the theorem of the cube, an even line bundle LL satisfies [m]∗​L≃L⊗m2[m]^{*}L\simeq L^{\otimes m^{2}}, while for an odd line bundle LL, one has [m]∗​L≃L⊗m[m]^{*}L\simeq L^{\otimes m} ; moreover, there are in each case a unique isomorphism compatible with the trivialization at the origin. By Lemma 2.4.1, an even (resp. an odd) line bundle possesses a canonical continuous metric making this isomorphism an isometry. This furnishes a canonical metric on L⊗2L^{\otimes 2}, hence on LL. According to this lemma, this metric is semi-positive if LL is ample and even. Using a Lemma of Künnemann, ([17], Lemme 2.3), one proves that this also holds if LL is algebraically equivalent to 00. In any case, the canonical metrics are admissible.

The case of good reduction

When the variety X\mathrm{X} has good reduction, the canonical metrics and the associated measures are fairly easy to describe. Indeed, let 𝔛\mathfrak{X} be the Néron model of X\mathrm{X} over K∘K^{\circ}, an Abelian scheme. For any line bundle LL on X\mathrm{X} there is a unique line bundle 𝔏\mathfrak{L} on 𝔛\mathfrak{X} which extends LL and which admits a trivialization at the 00 section extending the given one over KK. By the theorem of the cube for the Abelian scheme 𝔛\mathfrak{X}, the isomorphism [m]∗​L≃L⊗ma[m]^{*}L\simeq L^{\otimes m^{a}} (with a=1a=1 or 22, according to whether LL is odd or even) extends uniquely to an isomorphism [m]∗​𝔏≃𝔏⊗ma[m]^{*}\mathfrak{L}\simeq\mathfrak{L}^{\otimes m^{a}}. This implies that the canonical metrics are algebraic, induced by these models.

The description of the canonical measures on 𝔛\mathfrak{X} follows at once. Let ξ\xi be the point of X\mathrm{X} whose reduction is the generic point of the special fiber of 𝔛\mathfrak{X}. Then, for any family (L1,…,Ln)(L_{1},\dots,L_{n}) of line bundles on X\mathrm{X}, one has

c1​(L¯1)​…​c1​(L¯n)=deg⁡(c1​(L1)​…​c1​(Ln))​δξ.c_{1}(\overline{L}_{1})\dots c_{1}(\overline{L}_{n})=\deg(c_{1}(L_{1})\dots c_{1}(L_{n}))\delta_{\xi}.

We see in particular that they only depend on the classes of the line bundles LjL_{j} modulo numerical equivalence.

Gubler’s description

In the case of bad reduction, the description of the canonical measures has been established by W. Gubler [39].

Up to replacing KK by a finite extension, we assume that X\mathrm{X} has split semi-stable reduction. Raynaud’s uniformization involves an analytic group E\mathrm{E} which is an extension of an abelian variety with good reduction Y\mathrm{Y} by a split torus T≃𝐆mt\mathrm{T}\simeq{\mathbf{G}_{\mathrm{m}}}^{t}, where t∈{1,…,n}t\in\{1,\dots,n\} — the so-called Raynaud extension of X\mathrm{X}. One has t≥1t\geq 1 since we assume bad reduction ; moreover, dim⁡Y=dim⁡E−t=n−t\operatorname{dim}\mathrm{Y}=\operatorname{dim}\mathrm{E}-t=n-t. There is a morphism p:E→Xp\colon\mathrm{E}\rightarrow\mathrm{X}, whose kernel is a discrete subgroup MM of E⁡(K)\mathrm{E}(K), so that the induced map E/Λ→X\mathrm{E}/\Lambda\rightarrow\mathrm{X} is an isomorphism. When t=nt=n, one says that X\mathrm{X} has totally degenerate reduction, and the morphism pp is the rigid analytic uniformization of the abelian variety X\mathrm{X}.

Moreover, E\mathrm{E} is constructed as a contracted product (E1×T)/T1(\mathrm{E}_{1}\times\mathrm{T})/\mathrm{T}_{1} from an extension E1\mathrm{E}_{1} of Y\mathrm{Y} by the “unit subtorus” T1\mathrm{T}_{1} of T\mathrm{T} (defined by the equalities |Tj​(x)|=1\left|{T_{j}(x)}\right|=1 for j∈{1,…,t}j\in\{1,\dots,t\} and x∈Tx\in\mathrm{T}). The natural map λT:T→𝐑t\lambda_{\mathrm{T}}\colon\mathrm{T}\rightarrow{\mathbf{R}}^{t} defined by

x↦(−log⁡|T1​(x)|,…,−log⁡|Tt​(x)|)x\mapsto(-\log\left|{T_{1}(x)}\right|,\dots,-\log\left|{T_{t}(x)}\right|)

is continuous and surjective ; it admits a canonical section ιT\iota_{\mathrm{T}} which maps a point (u1,…,ut)∈𝐑t(u_{1},\dots,u_{t})\in{\mathbf{R}}^{t} to the semi-norm

f↦sup𝐦∈𝐙ta𝐦​e−m1​u1−⋯−mt​ut,for f=∑𝐦a𝐦​T1m1​…​Ttmt∈𝒪⁡(T).f\mapsto\sup_{\mathbf{m}\in{\mathbf{Z}}^{t}}a_{\mathbf{m}}e^{-m_{1}u_{1}-\dots-m_{t}u_{t}},\qquad\text{for $f=\sum_{\mathbf{m}}a_{\mathbf{m}}T_{1}^{m_{1}}\dots T_{t}^{m_{t}}\in\mathscr{O}(\mathrm{T}).$}

The map λT\lambda_{\mathrm{T}} extends uniquely to a morphism λ:E→𝐑t\lambda\colon\mathrm{E}\rightarrow{\mathbf{R}}^{t} whose kernel contains E1\mathrm{E}_{1}. The image Λ=λ⁡(M)\Lambda=\lambda(M) is a lattice of 𝐑t{\mathbf{R}}^{t}, and the morphism pp induces a continuous proper morphism ρ:X→𝐑t/Λ\rho\colon\mathrm{X}\rightarrow{\mathbf{R}}^{t}/\Lambda. Composing the section ιT\iota_{\mathrm{T}} with the projection pp furnishes a section ι:𝐑t/Λ→X\iota\colon{\mathbf{R}}^{t}/\Lambda\rightarrow\mathrm{X} of ρ\rho. Its image is the skeleton of X\mathrm{X}. Gubler’s theorem ([39], Cor. 7.3) is the following :

Theorem 2.5.1.

Let L1,…,LnL_{1},\dots,L_{n} be line bundles on X\mathrm{X}. The canonical measure c1​(L¯1)​…​c1​(L¯n)c_{1}(\overline{L}_{1})\dots c_{1}(\overline{L}_{n}) is the direct image by ι\iota of the unique Haar measure on 𝐑t/Λ{\mathbf{R}}^{t}/\Lambda whose total mass is deg⁡(L1​…​Ln)\deg(L_{1}\dots L_{n}).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.