2.5. Abelian varieties [01JU]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.5. Abelian varieties
Let us assume throughout this section that is an Abelian variety. For any integer , let be the multiplication-by- endomorphism of .
Canonical metrics
Let be a line bundle on . Let be the neutral element of and let us fix a trivialization of at .
The line bundle is canonically decomposed as the tensor product of an even and an odd line bundle :
By the theorem of the cube, an even line bundle satisfies , while for an odd line bundle , one has ; moreover, there are in each case a unique isomorphism compatible with the trivialization at the origin. By Lemma 2.4.1, an even (resp. an odd) line bundle possesses a canonical continuous metric making this isomorphism an isometry. This furnishes a canonical metric on , hence on . According to this lemma, this metric is semi-positive if is ample and even. Using a Lemma of Künnemann, ([17], Lemme 2.3), one proves that this also holds if is algebraically equivalent to . In any case, the canonical metrics are admissible.
The case of good reduction
When the variety has good reduction, the canonical metrics and the associated measures are fairly easy to describe. Indeed, let be the Néron model of over , an Abelian scheme. For any line bundle on there is a unique line bundle on which extends and which admits a trivialization at the section extending the given one over . By the theorem of the cube for the Abelian scheme , the isomorphism (with or , according to whether is odd or even) extends uniquely to an isomorphism . This implies that the canonical metrics are algebraic, induced by these models.
The description of the canonical measures on follows at once. Let be the point of whose reduction is the generic point of the special fiber of . Then, for any family of line bundles on , one has
We see in particular that they only depend on the classes of the line bundles modulo numerical equivalence.
Gubler’s description
In the case of bad reduction, the description of the canonical measures has been established by W. Gubler [39].
Up to replacing by a finite extension, we assume that has split semi-stable reduction. Raynaud’s uniformization involves an analytic group which is an extension of an abelian variety with good reduction by a split torus , where — the so-called Raynaud extension of . One has since we assume bad reduction ; moreover, . There is a morphism , whose kernel is a discrete subgroup of , so that the induced map is an isomorphism. When , one says that has totally degenerate reduction, and the morphism is the rigid analytic uniformization of the abelian variety .
Moreover, is constructed as a contracted product from an extension of by the “unit subtorus” of (defined by the equalities for and ). The natural map defined by
is continuous and surjective ; it admits a canonical section which maps a point to the semi-norm
The map extends uniquely to a morphism whose kernel contains . The image is a lattice of , and the morphism induces a continuous proper morphism . Composing the section with the projection furnishes a section of . Its image is the skeleton of . Gubler’s theorem ([39], Cor. 7.3) is the following :
Theorem 2.5.1.
Let be line bundles on . The canonical measure is the direct image by of the unique Haar measure on whose total mass is .