ScalingStacks

Démonstration. [01JL]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Démonstration.

Let us first prove uniqueness. If L¯\overline{L} and L¯′\overline{L}^{\prime} are two metrics on LL, let φ\varphi be the continuous function such that ‖⋅‖′=e−φ​‖⋅‖\left\|{\cdot}\right\|^{\prime}=e^{-\varphi}\left\|{\cdot}\right\|. Assuming that ε\varepsilon is an isometry for these two metrics, one obtains the following equation

φ⁡(f⁡(x))=d​φ​(x),\varphi(f(x))=d\varphi(x),

for any x∈Xx\in\mathrm{X}. Since X\mathrm{X} is compact, φ\varphi is bounded and this equation implies that ‖φ‖∞≤1d​‖φ‖∞\left\|{\varphi}\right\|_{\infty}\leq\frac{1}{d}\left\|{\varphi}\right\|_{\infty}. Since d≥2d\geq 2, one concludes that φ≡0\varphi\equiv 0.

For the existence, one begins with any continuous metric L¯0\overline{L}_{0} on LL. Let us then consider the sequence of metrics (L¯n)(\overline{L}_{n}) on LL induced by the pull-backs on Ld=ε​f∗​LL^{d}=\varepsilon f^{*}L, Ld2=(ε​f∗)2​LL^{d^{2}}=(\varepsilon f^{*})^{2}L, etc., hence on LL. Since d≥2d\geq 2, a similar contraction argument as the one used for uniqueness shows that this is a Cauchy sequence of metrics on LL ; consequently, it converges to a continuous metric on LL. If L¯0\overline{L}_{0} is chosen to be semi-positive, which we may if LL is ample, then all al of the metrized line bundles L¯n\overline{L}_{n} are semi-positive, hence the canonical metric is semi-positive.

Concretely, in the non-archimedean case, one begins with a model (𝔛0,𝔏0,e)(\mathfrak{X}_{0},\mathfrak{L}_{0},e) such that 𝔏0\mathfrak{L}_{0} is numerically effective. Then one considers the map f:X→𝔛0f\colon X\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}_{0} and the normalization 𝔛1\mathfrak{X}_{1} of 𝔛0\mathfrak{X}_{0} in XX ; this is a projective model 𝔛1\mathfrak{X}_{1}, equiped with a finite morphism f1:𝔛1→𝔛0f_{1}\colon\mathfrak{X}_{1}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}_{0} extending ff. Moreover, 𝔏1=f1∗​𝔏0\mathfrak{L}_{1}=f_{1}^{*}\mathfrak{L}_{0} is a model of f∗​Lef^{*}L^{e} which is identified with Le​dL^{ed} via the fixed isomorphism ε\varepsilon. Iterating this construction defines a sequence (𝔛n,𝔏n,e​dn)(\mathfrak{X}_{n},\mathfrak{L}_{n},ed^{n}) of models of (X,L)(X,L), with finite morphisms fn:𝔛n→𝔛n−1f_{n}\colon\mathfrak{X}_{n}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}_{n-1} such that fn∗​𝔏n−1=𝔏nf_{n}^{*}\mathfrak{L}_{n-1}=\mathfrak{L}_{n}. The metric on LL defined by any of these models is semi-positive, hence so is their uniform limit. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.