Démonstration. [01JL]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Démonstration.
Let us first prove uniqueness. If and are two metrics on , let be the continuous function such that . Assuming that is an isometry for these two metrics, one obtains the following equation
for any . Since is compact, is bounded and this equation implies that . Since , one concludes that .
For the existence, one begins with any continuous metric on . Let us then consider the sequence of metrics on induced by the pull-backs on , , etc., hence on . Since , a similar contraction argument as the one used for uniqueness shows that this is a Cauchy sequence of metrics on ; consequently, it converges to a continuous metric on . If is chosen to be semi-positive, which we may if is ample, then all al of the metrized line bundles are semi-positive, hence the canonical metric is semi-positive.
Concretely, in the non-archimedean case, one begins with a model such that is numerically effective. Then one considers the map and the normalization of in ; this is a projective model , equiped with a finite morphism extending . Moreover, is a model of which is identified with via the fixed isomorphism . Iterating this construction defines a sequence of models of , with finite morphisms such that . The metric on defined by any of these models is semi-positive, hence so is their uniform limit. ∎