ScalingStacks

Proof. [046A]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By construction log⁡|z3|\log|z_{3}| is a function of η1,η2,μ\eta_{1},\eta_{2},\mu with differential

d​log⁡|z3|=V(1)​d​μ+Re​(β13​d​η1+β23​d​η2)+Im​(θ13∞​d​η1+θ23∞​d​η2).d\log|z_{3}|=V_{(1)}d\mu+\text{Re}(\beta_{13}d\eta_{1}+\beta_{23}d\eta_{2})+\text{Im}(\theta^{\infty}_{13}d\eta_{1}+\theta_{23}^{\infty}d\eta_{2}).

In particular the positivity of V(1)V_{(1)} in M−M^{-} means log⁡|z3|\log|z_{3}| is increasing in μ\mu. Around a given point P∈S∩M−P\in S\cap M^{-}, we first show continuity of z3z_{3} at PP. Observe

log|z3|(η1,η2,μ)=log|z3|(η1,η2,A−1/4)+∫A−1/4μV(1)dμ.\log|z_{3}|(\eta_{1},\eta_{2},\mu)=\log|z_{3}|(\eta_{1},\eta_{2},A^{-1/4})+\int_{A^{-1/4}}^{\mu}V_{(1)}d\mu.

Here log|z3|(η1,η2,μ=A−1/4)\log|z_{3}|(\eta_{1},\eta_{2},\mu=A^{-1/4}) is locally L∞L^{\infty} by smoothness of log⁡z3\log z_{3} in {μ>0}\{\mu>0\}. Applying Proposition 4.16 and neglecting all locally bounded terms, as (η1,η2,μ)→(η1​(P),η2​(P),0)(\eta_{1},\eta_{2},\mu)\to(\eta_{1}(P),\eta_{2}(P),0),

log|z3|∼∫A−1/4μA1/22​Rdμ∼12log(A1/2​μ+RA1/4)→−∞,\log|z_{3}|\sim\int_{A^{-1/4}}^{\mu}\frac{A^{1/2}}{2R}d\mu\sim\frac{1}{2}\log(\frac{A^{1/2}\mu+R}{A^{1/4}})\to-\infty,

or equivalently |z3|→0|z_{3}|\to 0 as required. The case of z4z_{4} is completely analogous.

Since (g(1),Ω(1))(g^{(1)},\Omega^{(1)}) is C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-regular by Proposition 4.19, holomorphicity implies that z3,z4z_{3},z_{4} are C2,αC^{2,\alpha}-regular in the local chart of Section 4.4. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.