ScalingStacks

Proof. [045N]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Applying the asymptotes in Proposition 4.16 and 4.18, on the local chart {r≲A1/4}\{r\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, up to an error of order O(A−3/4max(1,log(A−1/4ϱ)))O(A^{-3/4}\max(1,\log(A^{-1/4}\varrho))), the ansatz metric admits asymptote

(4.21) {g(1)=V(1)​d​μ2+V(1)−1​ϑ2+Re​(W(1)p​q¯​d​ηp⊗d​η¯q)∼12​μ2+|ξ1|2​(d​μ2+|d​ξ1|2)+(A+12​μ2+|ξ|2)−1​ϑ2+ga,ω(1)∼d​μ∧ϑ+−12​(ap​q¯​d​ηp∧d​η¯q+12​μ2+|ξ1|2​d​ξ1∧d​ξ¯1),Ω(1)∼A1/2{ϑ−−1(A+12​μ2+|ξ1|2)dμ)}∧dη1∧dη2.\begin{cases}\begin{split}g^{(1)}=&V_{(1)}d\mu^{2}+V_{(1)}^{-1}\vartheta^{2}+\text{Re}(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(1)}d\eta_{p}\otimes d\bar{\eta}_{q})\\ \sim&\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2}}}(d\mu^{2}+|d\xi_{1}|^{2})+(A+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\xi|^{2}}})^{-1}\vartheta^{2}+g_{a},\end{split}\\ \omega^{(1)}\sim d\mu\wedge\vartheta+\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(a_{p\bar{q}}d\eta_{p}\wedge d\bar{\eta}_{q}+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2}}}d\xi_{1}\wedge d\bar{\xi}_{1}),\\ \Omega^{(1)}\sim A^{1/2}\{\vartheta-\sqrt{-1}(A+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2}}})d\mu)\}\wedge d\eta_{1}\wedge d\eta_{2}.\end{cases}

The main issue then is to compare the connection ϑ\vartheta with ϑNUT\vartheta_{\text{NUT}}. The curvature of the Taub-NUT metric d​ϑNUTd\vartheta_{\text{NUT}} has the explicit formula

−1​{−μ4​(μ2+|ξ1|2)3/2​d​ξ1∧d​ξ¯1+−ξ¯14​(μ2+|ξ1|2)3/2​d​μ∧d​ξ1−−ξ14​(μ2+|ξ1|2)3/2​d​μ∧d​ξ¯1}.\sqrt{-1}\{\frac{-\mu}{4(\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2})^{3/2}}d\xi_{1}\wedge d\bar{\xi}_{1}+\frac{-\bar{\xi}_{1}}{4(\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2})^{3/2}}d\mu\wedge d\xi_{1}-\frac{-\xi_{1}}{4(\mu^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2})^{3/2}}d\mu\wedge d\bar{\xi}_{1}\}.

The curvature d​ϑd\vartheta is prescribed by formula (1.6), involving the first derivatives of vv and wp​q¯w^{p\bar{q}}. Applying the asymptotic from Proposition 4.18,

|(dϑ−dϑNUT)|ga≤CA−1/2,|∇ga(dϑ−dϑNUT)|gNUT≤CA−1/4ℓ−2.|(d\vartheta-d\vartheta_{\text{NUT}})|_{g_{a}}\leq CA^{-1/2},\quad|\nabla_{g_{a}}(d\vartheta-d\vartheta_{\text{NUT}})|_{g_{\text{NUT}}}\leq CA^{-1/4}\ell^{-2}.

In particular ‖(d​ϑ−d​ϑNUT)‖C−11​(gNUT)≤C​A1/4\left\lVert(d\vartheta-d\vartheta_{\text{NUT}})\right\rVert_{C^{1}_{-1}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{1/4}. After suitable gauge fixing, we can find a 1-form ϑ−ϑNUT\vartheta-\vartheta_{\text{NUT}} on the base {r≲A1/4}\{r\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, with norm estimate upstairs ‖ϑ−ϑNUT‖C01,α​(gNUT)≤CA−1/4\left\lVert\vartheta-\vartheta_{\text{NUT}}\right\rVert_{C^{1,\alpha}_{0}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{-1/4} for any fixed 0<α<10<\alpha<1. This specifies a gauge choice of ϑ\vartheta.

Thus up to an admissible amount of error we can replace ϑ\vartheta by ϑNUT\vartheta_{\text{NUT}} in the asymptote (4.21). The deviation between RHS of (4.21) and gNUTg_{\text{NUT}} is an elementary term Ψ∗​ga−A⁡(d​μ2+|d​ξ1|2+|d​ξ2|2)\Psi^{*}g_{a}-A(d\mu^{2}+|d\xi_{1}|^{2}+|d\xi_{2}|^{2}) controlled by (4.19). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.