ScalingStacks

Proof. [043I]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The method is to set up a Banach iteration scheme to correct the volume form error. The generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation can be rewritten in the linearised form

ℒ​φ1+1W~(1)​det(∂2φ1∂μi​∂μj)=E~(1).\mathcal{L}\varphi_{1}+\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}\det(\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}})=\tilde{E}^{(1)}.

where the linearised operator

ℒ=1W~(1)​(V~(1)11​∂2∂μ2​∂μ2+V~(1)22​∂2∂μ1​∂μ1−2​V~(1)12​∂2∂μ1​∂μ2+4​∂2∂η​∂η¯).\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}(\tilde{V}_{(1)}^{11}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{2}\partial\mu_{2}}+\tilde{V}_{(1)}^{22}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{1}\partial\mu_{1}}-2\tilde{V}^{12}_{(1)}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{1}\partial\mu_{2}}+4\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\eta\partial\bar{\eta}}).

The key point below is that in ℬν+∩{ℓ>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\} the quadratic term is small while ℒ\mathcal{L} is approximately Δa\Delta_{a}.

  • •

    Start with the initial volume form error E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} on ℬν+1+∩{ℓ≥A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell\geq A^{1/2}\}, where ‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν2\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2} according to Lemma 3.16. We will only need the precise value of E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} in the shrinked region ℬν+∩{ℓ>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\}.

  • •

    Define the extension norm for a function ff on ℬν+∩{ℓ>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\} as the infimum of the C−1,0k,αC^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}-norms for all functions f′f^{\prime} extending ff with compact support inside ℬν+1+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}. The extension norm of E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} is bounded by CA−3/4ν2CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}, since we can find an appropriate cutoff function χ\chi such that χ​E~(1)\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)} provides a required extension.

  • •

    Apply Proposition 3.21 to produce u1=Δa−1​(χ​E~(1)),u_{1}=\Delta_{a}^{-1}(\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)}), with second derivative bound on ℬν+1+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\},

    ‖∇ga2u1‖C−1,0k,α≤Cν‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α≤Cν3A−3/4.\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}.

    In particular on ℬν+1+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\},

    |∇2gau1|ga≤Cν3A−3/2,|\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}|_{g_{a}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2},

    which in fact holds on the entire ℬν+1+\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1} using Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonicity in {ℓ<A1/2}\{\ell<A^{1/2}\}. Whence the quadratic term is bounded on ℬν+1+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\} by

    ‖1W~(1)​det(∂2u1∂μi​∂μj)‖C−1,0k,α≤Cν3A−3/2‖∇2gau1‖C−1,0k,α≤Cν4A−3/2‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α≪‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α.\begin{split}\left\lVert\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}\det(\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}})\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq&C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2}\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \leq&C\nu^{4}A^{-3/2}\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \ll&\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}.\end{split}

    The last inequality uses the condition ν≪A3/8\nu\ll A^{3/8}.

    The linearised equation is approximately satisfied on ℬν+1+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}:

    ‖ℒ​u1−χ​E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α=‖ℒ​u1−Δa​u1‖C−1,0k,α≤A−3/4ν‖∇2gau1‖C−1,0k,α≪‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α.\begin{split}&\left\lVert\mathcal{L}u_{1}-\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}=\left\lVert\mathcal{L}u_{1}-\Delta_{a}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \leq&A^{-3/4}\nu\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\ll\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}.\end{split}

    where we used the metric deviation estimate in Lemma 3.12.

    Elementary algebra shows that inside ℬν+∩{ℓ>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}, the volume form error is improved:

    E~1(1)=det(W(1)p​q¯−4​∂2u1∂ηp​∂η¯q)​(V(1)+∂2u1∂μ​∂μ)−1−1,\tilde{E}^{(1)}_{1}=\det(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(1)}-4\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\eta_{p}\partial\bar{\eta}_{q}})(V_{(1)}+\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\mu\partial\mu})^{-1}-1,
    ‖E~1(1)‖Ck,α−1(ℬ+ν∩{ℓ>2A1/2})≪‖E~(1)‖Ck,α−1,0(ℬ+ν+1∩{ℓ>A1/2}).\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}(\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\})}\ll\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}(\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\})}.

    More formally the extension norm of E(1)E^{(1)} is far smaller than that of E(1)E^{(1)}, after taking into account the cutoff procedures.

  • •

    Iterate this procedure to produce u1,u2,…u_{1},u_{2},\ldots, each time improving the extension norm by a factor say 10−110^{-1}. The second derivative estimate

    ‖∇ga2uj‖C−1,0k,α≤C10−jν3A−3/4\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{j}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C10^{-j}\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}

    implies that the series ∑j∇ga2uj\sum_{j}\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{j} converges. The series φ1=∑juj\varphi_{1}=\sum_{j}u_{j} also converges after possibly adjusting uju_{j} by some affine linear functions, and satisfies the Hessian estimate ‖∇ga2φ1‖C−1,0k,α≤Cν3A−3/4.\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}. By construction the generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation holds on ℬν+∩{ℓ>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.