ScalingStacks

Proof. [040S]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The main task is to estimate the Calderon-Zygmund type operator

Gi​j​f​(x)=∫ℝ4(x−y)i​(x−y)j|x−y|a6​f​(y)​d​Vola​(y).G_{ij}f(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{4}}\frac{(x-y)_{i}(x-y)_{j}}{|x-y|_{a}^{6}}f(y)d\text{Vol}_{a}(y).

where (x−y)i(x-y)_{i} denotes the components of x−yx-y viewed as a vector in ℝ4\mathbb{R}^{4}. We say x∈ℝ4x\in\mathbb{R}^{4} belongs to the dyadic scale |x|∼2n|x|\sim 2^{n} where n∈ℕn\in\mathbb{N}, if either n=0n=0 and |x|≤1|x|\leq 1, or n>0n>0 and 2n≤|x|≤2n+12^{n}\leq|x|\leq 2^{n+1}. To ensure the Green operator is well defined, we will temporarily assume ff to be compactly supported, with no quantitative restriction on the measure of its support.

Since δ>−3\delta>-3 and |f⁡(y)|≲ℓ​(y)δ​|y→|aτ|f(y)|\lesssim\ell(y)^{\delta}|\vec{y}|_{a}^{\tau}, we have ‖f‖L1​(|y|∼2m)≲2m⁡(δ+τ+4)\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{L^{1}(|y|\sim 2^{m})}\lesssim 2^{m(\delta+\tau+4)}. Thus if |x|∼2n|x|\sim 2^{n} does not belong to scale mm, then the contribution of |y|∼2m|y|\sim 2^{m} to Gi​j​(x)G_{ij}(x) is bounded by O⁡(2m⁡(δ+τ+4)​min⁡{2−4​n,2−4​m})O(2^{m(\delta+\tau+4)}\min\{2^{-4n},2^{-4m}\}). Adding up all contributions from m≠nm\neq n, we get

|Gi​j​f​(x)−∫|y|∼2n(x−y)i​(x−y)j|x−y|a6​f​(y)​d​Vola​(y)|≲2n⁡(δ+τ)≲(1+|x|a)δ+τ,|G_{ij}f(x)-\int_{|y|\sim 2^{n}}\frac{(x-y)_{i}(x-y)_{j}}{|x-y|_{a}^{6}}f(y)d\text{Vol}_{a}(y)|\lesssim 2^{n(\delta+\tau)}\lesssim(1+|x|_{a})^{\delta+\tau},

using δ+τ<0\delta+\tau<0 for the summability of the series. Since the source is far from the observer, elliptic bootstrap implies higher order Hölder regularity.

Now that we are left with only one scale, it is clear that the claimed bound for second derivatives holds where ℓ\ell is comparable to |μ→|a|\vec{\mu}|_{a}. We now focus on xx close to 𝔇\mathfrak{D}. The contribution of |y−x|a≳ℓ⁡(x),|y|∼|x||y-x|_{a}\gtrsim\ell(x),|y|\sim|x| is estimated by

C​∫|y−x|a≳ℓ⁡(x),|y|∼|x|1|x−y|a4​ℓ​(y)δ​|y|τ​d​Vola​(y)≤C​(1+|x|a)τ​∫|y−x|a≳ℓ⁡(x)1|x−y|4−δ​(ℓ⁡(y−x)|x−y|a)δ​d​Vola​(y)≤C​(1+|x|a)τ​∫r>ℓ⁡(x)rδ−1​dr​∫S3(ℓ⁡(y′)|y′|)δ​d​AreaS3​(y′)≤C​(1+|x|a)τ​ℓ​(x)δ\begin{split}&C\int_{|y-x|_{a}\gtrsim\ell(x),|y|\sim|x|}\frac{1}{|x-y|_{a}^{4}}\ell(y)^{\delta}|y|^{\tau}d\text{Vol}_{a}(y)\\ \leq&C(1+|x|_{a})^{\tau}\int_{|y-x|_{a}\gtrsim\ell(x)}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{4-\delta}}(\frac{\ell(y-x)}{|x-y|_{a}})^{\delta}d\text{Vol}_{a}(y)\\ \leq&C(1+|x|_{a})^{\tau}\int_{r>\ell(x)}r^{\delta-1}dr\int_{S^{3}}(\frac{\ell(y^{\prime})}{|y^{\prime}|})^{\delta}d\text{Area}_{S^{3}}(y^{\prime})\\ \leq&C(1+|x|_{a})^{\tau}\ell(x)^{\delta}\end{split}

where we use −3<δ<0-3<\delta<0 in the convergence of the integrals. Since the contribution comes from sources at distance at least ℓ⁡(x)\ell(x) away from the observer, the higher Hölder norms are controlled. Finally, the estimates for the contribution from |y−x|a≲ℓ⁡(x)|y-x|_{a}\lesssim\ell(x) follows simply from standard Schauder theory.

At this stage we have proved the second derivative bound

|∇ga2Δa−1​f|ga≤C​ℓδ​(|μ→|a+1)τ|\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f|_{g_{a}}\leq C\ell^{\delta}(|\vec{\mu}|_{a}+1)^{\tau}

together with an implicit weighted Ck,αC^{k,\alpha}-bound in the gag_{a}-metric. Since ff is compactly supported by our temporary assumption, qualitatively Δa−1​f\Delta^{-1}_{a}f has quadratic decay at infinity. By integrating the second order derivatives from infinity, we can bound first order derivatives d​Δa−1​fd\Delta_{a}^{-1}f:

|d​Δa−1​f|ga≤C​ℓδ+1​(|μ→|a+1)τ,|d\Delta_{a}^{-1}f|_{g_{a}}\leq C\ell^{\delta+1}(|\vec{\mu}|_{a}+1)^{\tau},

using δ+τ<−1\delta+\tau<-1 and δ<−1\delta<-1 in the integration. Alternatively the first order derivative bounds can be proved using the same singular integral operator method.

Now the Hessian ∇g(2)2Δa−1​f\nabla^{2}_{g^{(2)}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f can be expanded as a linear combination of second derivatives ∂2∂μi​∂μj​Δa−1​f\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f etc and first derivatives ∂∂μi​Δa−1​f\frac{\partial}{\partial\mu_{i}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f etc. Hence

|∇g(2)2Δa−1​f|≤∑|∂2∂μi​∂μj​Δa−1​f|​|∇μi|​|∇μj|+∑|∂∂μi​Δa−1​f|​|∇g(2)2μi|,|\nabla^{2}_{g^{(2)}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f|\leq\sum|\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f||\nabla\mu_{i}||\nabla\mu_{j}|+\sum|\frac{\partial}{\partial\mu_{i}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f||\nabla_{g^{(2)}}^{2}\mu_{i}|,

where the sum includes also η\eta-derivatives. Higher order derivatives of the Hessian can be expanded by the Leibniz rule. Using ‖d​μi‖C0,0k,α≤C\left\lVert d\mu_{i}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq C and ‖d​η‖C0,0k,α≤C\left\lVert d\eta\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq C, we obtain the Hessian bound ‖∇g(2)2Δa−1​f‖Cδ,τk,α​(ℂ3)≤C\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g^{(2)}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,\tau}(\mathbb{C}^{3})}\leq C as claimed.

Finally, an approximation argument in the weak topology removes the compact support assumption on ff, so we conclude that ∇g(2)2Δa−1\nabla^{2}_{g^{(2)}}\Delta_{a}^{-1} extends canonically to a bounded linear operator between the weighted Hölder spaces.

As a delicate side remark, to bound the integral operator Δa−1\Delta_{a}^{-1} itself we would need to impose further δ+τ<−2\delta+\tau<-2 and δ<−2\delta<-2, which would not be adequate for our intended applications. It is crucial in the above argument that the integral kernel of Gi​jG_{ij} decays two orders faster than the Green kernel. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.