ScalingStacks

Remark 1.5 . [03YR]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 1.5.

The inverse matrix (V−1)i​j(V^{-1})^{ij} describes the metric restricted to the torus fibres, and the matrix Wp​q¯W^{p\bar{q}} describes the metric induced on the Kähler quotients. This viewpoint is taken by Pedersen and Poon [23], whose argument shows that Calabi-Yau manifolds with Hamiltonian torus symmetries necessarily arise from this construction locally. The local existence of the potential Φ\Phi is equivalent to the linear integrability condition

(1.10) ∂Vi​j∂μk=∂Vi​k∂μj,∂Wp​q¯∂ηr=∂Wr​q∂ηp,∂Wp​r∂η¯q=∂Wp​q¯∂η¯r,\frac{\partial V^{ij}}{\partial\mu_{k}}=\frac{\partial V^{ik}}{\partial\mu_{j}},\quad\frac{\partial W^{p\bar{q}}}{\partial\eta_{r}}=\frac{\partial W^{rq}}{\partial\eta_{p}},\quad\frac{\partial W^{pr}}{\partial\bar{\eta}_{q}}=\frac{\partial W^{p\bar{q}}}{\partial\bar{\eta}_{r}},

and

(1.11) ∂2Wp​q¯∂μi​∂μj+4​∂2Vi​j∂ηp​∂η¯q=0.\frac{\partial^{2}W^{p\bar{q}}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}}+4\frac{\partial^{2}V^{ij}}{\partial\eta_{p}\partial\bar{\eta}_{q}}=0.

In particular when N=2,𝔫=1N=2,\mathfrak{n}=1, the Calabi-Yau condition is V=WV=W and we recover the usual Gibbons-Hawking equation from (1.11).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.