2.2. d l t -models [04US]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.2. -models
(2.2.1) A -model of is a normal proper -model of such that is a -pair. This means that is log canonical and that each log canonical center of has non-empty intersection with . In particular, every proper -model of is a -model. An equivalent formulation of the definition is the following: is -Cartier, and for every log resolution of and every irreducible component of , the multiplicity of in the log pullback of to is at most . Moreover, if it is equal to , then must have non-empty intersection with . In practice, we will apply the property via Lemma 3.2.3 below.
(2.2.2) We say that a -model of is a good minimal model if is -factorial and is semi-ample over .
(2.2.3) For every -model of , we can define the dual complex for the -pair by gluing cells corresponding to irreducible components of intersections of irreducible components of , as in Definition 8 in [dFKX12]. When is not algebraically closed, we note that we only glue cells corresponding to irreducible components (instead of geometrically irreducible components). In other words, is the quotient of the -equivariant dual complex constructed in [dFKX12, §31].
(2.2.4) For every -model of , the log canonical centers of are the irreducible components of intersections of irreducible components of , by [Ko13, 4.16]. These are also precisely the closures in of the connected components of intersections of irreducible components of (since these connected components are the log canonical centers of ). Thus, the dual intersection complex is the same as the dual intersection complex of the strict normal crossings divisor , and the cells of this complex correspond bijectively to the log canonical centers of . See Section 2 in [dFKX12] for more background.
(2.2.5) Let and be two -models of over . We say that and are crepant birational if there exist a normal proper -model of and morphisms of -models for such that the log pullbacks of and coincide (see [Ko13, 2.23]). Note that we can always assume that is an -model, by taking a log resolution of . The following theorem collects two fundamental results from the Minimal Model Program.
Theorem 2.2.6.
- (1)
The -scheme has a good minimal -model if and only if is semi-ample over .
- (2)
Any two good minimal -models of are crepant birational.
Proof.
(1) The condition that is semi-ample over is obviously necessary, since for every -model of , the divisor is -linearly equivalent to the restriction of to . Conversely, assume that is semi-ample over , and let be a proper -model of . Then applying [HX13, 2.12] to the -pair , we see that has a good minimal -model. Condition (1) of [HX13, 2.12] follows from our assumption, and condition (2) follows from the following observation. Let be a positive integer such that is Cartier. Over a sufficiently small open neighbourhood of in , we have an isomorphism of -algebras
where with the structural morphism. Thus it suffices to show that
is a finitely generated -algebra. If we denote by the maximum of the multiplicities of the components in then we may assume that , so that
is a pair. Hence, the finite generation of follows from [BCHM10].