ScalingStacks

3.1. Retraction to the skeleton of an s ​ n ​ c -model [04V1]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.1. Retraction to the skeleton of an s​n​csnc-model

(3.1.1) Let 𝒴\mathscr{Y} be a connected regular flat separated RR-scheme of finite type such that the special fiber 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k} is a divisor with strict normal crossings. Then, as explained in [MN13, §3.1], one can associate to 𝒴\mathscr{Y} its skeleton Sk⁡(𝒴)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}), which is a topological subspace of the generic fiber 𝒴^η\widehat{\mathscr{Y}}_{\eta} of the formal tt-adic completion of 𝒴\mathscr{Y}. It is the set of points of 𝒴^η\widehat{\mathscr{Y}}_{\eta} that correspond to a real valuation on the function field of 𝒴K\mathscr{Y}_{K} that is monomial with respect to the strict normal crossings divisor 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k}. The skeleton Sk⁡(𝒴)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}) is canonically homeomorphic to the dual intersection complex 𝒟⁡((𝒴k)red)\mathcal{D}((\mathscr{Y}_{k})_{\mathrm{red}}) of 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k}, and there exists a canonical continuous retraction

ρ𝒴:𝒴^η→Sk⁡(𝒴).\rho_{\mathscr{Y}}:\widehat{\mathscr{Y}}_{\eta}\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}).

Moreover, Sk⁡(𝒴)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}) carries a canonical piecewise ℤ\mathbb{Z}-affine structure [MN13, §3.2].

(3.1.2) We keep the notations from (2.1). For each 𝒞\mathscr{C}-model 𝒳\mathscr{X} of XX, we define the skeleton of 𝒳\mathscr{X} by

Sk⁡(𝒳)=Sk⁡(𝒳Rsnc)⊂(𝒳Rsnc)^η⊂XKan\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X})=\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}_{R})\subset\widehat{(\mathscr{X}^{\mathrm{snc}}_{R})}_{\eta}\subset X_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}

and we write ρ𝒳\rho_{\mathscr{X}} for ρ𝒳Rsnc\rho_{\mathscr{X}_{R}^{\mathrm{snc}}}. If 𝒳\mathscr{X} is a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX, one has the following crucial property.

Theorem 3.1.3.

If 𝒳\mathscr{X} is a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX over 𝒞\mathscr{C}, then there exists a continuous map

H:[0,1]×XKan→XKanH:[0,1]\times X_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}\to X_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}

such that H⁡(0,⋅)H(0,\cdot) is the identity, H⁡(t,x)=xH(t,x)=x for all xx in Sk⁡(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) and all tt in [0,1][0,1], and H⁡(1,⋅)=ρ𝒳H(1,\cdot)=\rho_{\mathscr{X}}. Thus Sk⁡(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) is a strong deformation retract of XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}.

Proof.

A closely related result is proven in [Th07, 3.26]. We will explain how our statement can be deduced from that result. Following the notation in [Th07], we denote by 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} the kk-analytic space associated to the toroidal embedding X↪𝒳X\hookrightarrow\mathscr{X}, where kk is endowed with the trivial absolute value. By definition, 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} is the generic fiber of the formal tt-adic completion 𝒳^\widehat{\mathscr{X}} of 𝒳\mathscr{X}, viewed as a special formal kk-scheme by forgetting the k⁡[[t]]k[\negthinspace[t]\negthinspace]-structure [Be96, §1].

The relation between 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} and XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} is explained in detail at the beginning of Section 4 in [Ni11]; let us recall the main idea. Considering the morphism of special formal kk-schemes 𝒳^→Spf​k​[[t]]\widehat{\mathscr{X}}\to\mathrm{Spf}\,k[\negthinspace[t]\negthinspace] and passing to the generic fibers, we obtain a morphism of kk-analytic spaces from 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} to the open unit disc DD over kk. We can identify the underlying topological space of DD with [0,1[[0,1[ by means of the homeomorphism

D→[0,1[:x↦|t(x)|.D\to[0,1[\,:x\mapsto|t(x)|.

The residue field of DD at the point 1/e1/e in [0,1[[0,1[ is KK with our chosen tt-adic absolute value |⋅|K|\cdot|_{K}, and the KK-analytic space XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} is canonically isomorphic to the fiber of 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} over 1/e1/e. Thus we can view XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}} as the subspace of 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} consisting of the points xx such that |t⁡(x)|=1/e|t(x)|=1/e.

In [Th07, 3.13], Thuillier constructs a retraction p𝒳p_{\mathscr{X}} of 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} onto a certain subspace 𝒮⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X}), the skeleton of the toroidal embedding. Moreover, in [Th07, 3.26], he shows that p𝒳p_{\mathscr{X}} can be extended to a strong deformation retraction HH of 𝒳ℶ\mathscr{X}^{\beth} onto 𝒮⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X}). Going through the definitions, one observes that p𝒳p_{\mathscr{X}} and HH commute with the morphism 𝒳ℶ→D\mathscr{X}^{\beth}\to D and that the restriction of

p𝒳:𝒳ℶ→𝒮⁡(𝒳)p_{\mathscr{X}}:\mathscr{X}^{\beth}\to\mathcal{S}(\mathscr{X})

over the point 1/e1/e of DD is precisely the retraction

ρ𝒳:XKan→Sk⁡(𝒳).\rho_{\mathscr{X}}:X_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}).

Thus by restricting HH over 1/e∈D1/e\in D, we obtain a map that satisfies all the properties in the statement. ∎

(3.1.4) Theorem 3.1.3 can be extended to the case where XX is defined over KK instead of CC and 𝒳\mathscr{X} is a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX over RR. The general proof technique is the same as in [Th07], but one replaces the formalism of toroidal embeddings by the more flexible language of logarithmic geometry. Details will appear in [Ni13]. We will only use this generalization in the proof of Theorem 4.2.4.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.