ScalingStacks

Subsubsection [04WE]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

(4.2.1) In this section, we will extend Theorems 3.2.8, 4.1.4, 4.1.7 and 4.1.10 to the case where XX is a Calabi-Yau variety over K=k⁑((t))K=k(\negthinspace(t)\negthinspace) instead of over the curve CC. The crucial point is that the skeleton of a Calabi-Yau variety can be computed from the logarithmic structure on the special fiber of any s​n​csnc-model.

Proposition 4.2.2.

Let 𝒴\mathscr{Y} be a connected regular flat proper RR-scheme such that 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k} is a strict normal crossings divisor. Then for every connected flat proper RR-scheme 𝒡\mathscr{Z} and every isomorphism of R/(t2)R/(t^{2})-schemes

f:𝒴×RR/(t2)→𝒡×RR/(t2),f:\mathscr{Y}\times_{R}R/(t^{2})\to\mathscr{Z}\times_{R}R/(t^{2}),

the following properties hold.

  1. (1)

    The scheme 𝒡\mathscr{Z} is regular and 𝒡k\mathscr{Z}_{k} is a divisor with strict normal crossings.

  2. (2)

    Denote by S+S^{+} the log scheme associated to Rβˆ–{0}β†’RR\setminus\{0\}\to R and by 𝒴+\mathscr{Y}^{+} and 𝒡+\mathscr{Z}^{+} the schemes 𝒴\mathscr{Y} and 𝒡\mathscr{Z} endowed with the divisorial log structures associated to their special fibers. For every integer d>0d>0 we denote by sd+s^{+}_{d} the standard log point (Spec​k,kβˆ—βŠ•β„•)(\mathrm{Spec}\,k,k^{*}\oplus\mathbb{N}) viewed as a log scheme over S+S^{+} via the morphism of charts β„•β†’β„•:n↦d​n\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}:n\mapsto dn. If we denote by ee the least common multiple of the multiplicities of the components of 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k}, then there exists an isomorphism of log schemes

    g:𝒴+Γ—S+se+→𝒡+Γ—S+se+g:\mathscr{Y}^{+}\times_{S^{+}}s^{+}_{e}\to\mathscr{Z}^{+}\times_{S^{+}}s^{+}_{e}

    over se+s^{+}_{e}, such that gg is compatible with the reduction of ff modulo tt (meaning that the obvious square in the category of kk-schemes commutes).

Proof.

It is easy to see that (1) holds, since we can detect regularity by looking at the dimensions of the Zariski tangent spaces at the points of

𝒴×RR/(t2)≅𝒡×RR/(t2).\mathscr{Y}\times_{R}R/(t^{2})\cong\mathscr{Z}\times_{R}R/(t^{2}).

Moreover, the special fibers of 𝒴\mathscr{Y} and 𝒡\mathscr{Z} are isomorphic so that 𝒡k\mathscr{Z}_{k} is a divisor with strict normal crossings. Point (2) is more subtle and follows from [Ki03, 2.6(2)]. ∎

Proposition 4.2.3.

Let 𝒴\mathscr{Y} be a connected regular flat proper RR-scheme such that 𝒴K\mathscr{Y}_{K} has trivial canonical sheaf and 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k} is a strict normal crossings divisor. Then the skeleta Sk⁑(𝒴)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}) and Sk⁑(𝒴K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K}) only depend on 𝒴×RR/(t2),\mathscr{Y}\times_{R}R/(t^{2}), in the following sense. Assume that 𝒡\mathscr{Z} is a regular flat proper RR-scheme such that 𝒡K\mathscr{Z}_{K} has trivial canonical sheaf and there exists an isomorphism of R/(t2)R/(t^{2})-schemes

f:𝒴×RR/(t2)→𝒡×RR/(t2).f:\mathscr{Y}\times_{R}R/(t^{2})\to\mathscr{Z}\times_{R}R/(t^{2}).

Then there exists an isomorphism of simplicial spaces Sk⁑(𝒴)β†’Sk⁑(𝒡)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y})\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}) that maps Sk⁑(𝒴K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K}) onto Sk⁑(𝒡K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}_{K}).

Proof.

Reducing ff modulo tt, we obtain an isomorphism of kk-schemes 𝒴k→𝒡k\mathscr{Y}_{k}\to\mathscr{Z}_{k} and, by taking the dual intersection complexes, an isomorphism of simplicial spaces with piecewise β„€\mathbb{Z}-affine structure Sk⁑(𝒴)β†’Sk⁑(𝒡)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y})\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}). We will prove that this isomorphism maps Sk⁑(𝒴K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K}) onto Sk⁑(𝒡K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}_{K}).

We use the notations from Proposition 4.2.2(2) and we set s+=s1+s^{+}=s_{1}^{+}. We denote by 𝒴k+\mathscr{Y}^{+}_{k} the log scheme 𝒴+Γ—S+s+\mathscr{Y}^{+}\times_{S^{+}}s^{+} obtained by restricting the log structure on 𝒴+\mathscr{Y}^{+} to the special fiber 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k} of 𝒴\mathscr{Y}. It follows from [IKN05, 7.1] that

Ξ©:=H0​(𝒴,ω𝒴+/S+)\Omega:=H^{0}(\mathscr{Y},\omega_{\mathscr{Y}^{+}/S^{+}})

is a free RR-module of rank one and that the reduction map

Ξ©βŠ—Rkβ†’Ξ©k:=H0​(𝒴k,ω𝒴k+/s+)\Omega\otimes_{R}k\to\Omega_{k}:=H^{0}(\mathscr{Y}_{k},\omega_{\mathscr{Y}^{+}_{k}/s^{+}})

is an isomorphism. Let Ο‰\omega be a generator of the RR-module Ξ©\Omega and denote by Ο‰k\omega_{k} its image in Ξ©k\Omega_{k}. By (3.2), the generic point ΞΎ\xi of an irreducible component EE of 𝒴k\mathscr{Y}_{k} is Ο‰\omega-essential in the sense of [MN13, 4.5.4] if and only if Ο‰k\omega_{k} generates ω𝒴k+/s+\omega_{\mathscr{Y}^{+}_{k}/s^{+}} at the point ΞΎ\xi. Moreover, the skeleton Sk⁑(𝒴K)=Sk⁑(𝒴K,Ο‰)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K})=\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K},\omega) is the simplicial subspace of Sk⁑(𝒴)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}) spanned by the vertices corresponding to such points ΞΎ\xi [MN13, 4.5.5]. However, for every integer d>0d>0, the stalk of ω𝒴k+/s+\omega_{\mathscr{Y}^{+}_{k}/s^{+}} at ΞΎ\xi is generated by global sections if and only if ω𝒴+Γ—S+sd+/sd+\omega_{\mathscr{Y}^{+}\times_{S^{+}}s_{d}^{+}/s_{d}^{+}} is generated by global sections at any point lying above ΞΎ\xi, by the base change property in [IKN05, 7.1]. The analogous statements hold for 𝒡\mathscr{Z}. Thus it follows from Proposition 4.2.2(2) that the isomorphism Sk⁑(𝒴)β†’Sk⁑(𝒡)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y})\to\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}) maps Sk⁑(𝒴K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Y}_{K}) onto Sk⁑(𝒡K)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{Z}_{K}). ∎

Theorem 4.2.4.

Let XX be a geometrically connected, smooth and proper KK-variety with trivial canonical sheaf. Then the following properties hold.

  1. (1)

    The essential skeleton Sk⁑(X)\mathrm{Sk}(X) is a strong deformation retract of XanX^{\mathrm{an}}.

  2. (2)

    If 𝒳\mathscr{X} is a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX over RR, then Sk⁑(X)\mathrm{Sk}(X) is contained in Sk⁑(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) and can be obtained from Sk⁑(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) (as a topological subspace of Sk⁑(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) with piecewise affine structure) by a finite number of elementary collapses.

  3. (3)

    The essential skeleton Sk⁑(X)\mathrm{Sk}(X) is a pseudo-manifold with boundary. If kk is algebraically closed and Sk⁑(X)\mathrm{Sk}(X) has dimension dim⁑(X)\mathrm{dim}(X), then it is a closed pseudo-manifold.

  4. (4)

    Assume that kk is algebraically closed and XX is projective. Let Οƒ\sigma be a topological generator of the absolute Galois group G⁑(Ka/K)G(K^{a}/K) and let β„“\ell be a prime. Then Sk⁑(XK)\mathrm{Sk}(X_{K}) has dimension n=dim(X)n=\dim(X) if and only if the action of Οƒ\sigma on

    He´​tn​(XΓ—KKa,β„šβ„“)H^{n}_{\mathrm{\acute{e}t}}(X\times_{K}K^{a},\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})

    has a Jordan block of size n+1n+1. If this holds, and hi,0​(X)=0h^{i,0}(X)=0 for 0<i<n0<i<n, then Sk⁑(XK)\mathrm{Sk}(X_{K}) is a β„š\mathbb{Q}-homology sphere.

Proof.

Let 𝒳\mathscr{X} be a proper s​n​csnc-model of XX over RR. By a standard argument based on spreading out and Greenberg Approximation (as explained in [MN13, 5.1.2], for instance) we can find a connected smooth kk-curve π’ž\mathscr{C}, a kk-rational point ss on π’ž\mathscr{C}, a uniformizer tt in π’ͺπ’ž,s\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{C},s} and a smooth and proper π’ž\mathscr{C}-scheme 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} with geometrically connected fibers such that there exists an isomorphism

𝒳×RR/(t2)β†’π’³β€²Γ—π’žSpec​π’ͺπ’ž,s/(t2)\mathscr{X}\times_{R}R/(t^{2})\to\mathscr{X}^{\prime}\times_{\mathscr{C}}\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{C},s}/(t^{2})

over R/(t2)β‰…Oπ’ž,s/(t2)R/(t^{2})\cong{O}_{\mathscr{C},s}/(t^{2}). Inspecting the proof of [MN13, 5.1.2], we see that we can also assume that the relative canonical sheaf of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} is trivial over C=π’žβˆ–{s}C=\mathscr{C}\setminus\{s\} (if the generic fiber of a smooth and proper family over an integral scheme has trivial canonical sheaf, then this holds for all fibers over some dense open subscheme of the base).

By (3.1) we know that Sk⁑(𝒳)\mathrm{Sk}(\mathscr{X}) is a strong deformation retract of XKanX_{K}^{\mathrm{an}}. Thus by Proposition 4.2.3, it suffices to prove assertions (1)–(3) for π’³β€²Γ—π’žSpec​K\mathscr{X}^{\prime}\times_{\mathscr{C}}\mathrm{Spec}\,K instead of XX. In this case, they follow from Corollary 3.3.6 and Theorems 3.2.8, 3.3.4, 4.1.4 and 4.1.7.

It remains to prove (4). Invoking the Lefschetz Principle, we may assume that k=β„‚k=\mathbb{C}. Taking for 𝒳\mathscr{X} a projective s​n​csnc-model over RR, we can arrange that 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} is projective over π’ž\mathscr{C}. By Proposition 4.2.2 and the theory of logarithmic nearby cycles [Na98, 3.3] the action of Οƒ\sigma on

He´​tn​(XΓ—KKa,β„šβ„“)H^{n}_{\mathrm{\acute{e}t}}(X\times_{K}K^{a},\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})

has a Jordan block of size n+1n+1 if and only if the corresponding statement holds for 𝒳Kβ€²\mathscr{X}^{\prime}_{K}. By Deligne’s comparison theorem for Γ©tale and complex analytic nearby cycles in [SGA7b, Exp.XIV], it is also equivalent to the property that the monodromy action on the degree nn singular cohomology of a general fiber of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime} has a Jordan block of size n+1n+1. If hi,0​(X)=0h^{i,0}(X)=0 for 0<i<n0<i<n, then we can assume that this also holds for a general fiber of 𝒳′\mathscr{X}^{\prime}, by the proof of [MN13, 5.1.2] (if this property is satisfied by the generic fiber of a smooth and proper family over an integral scheme, then it holds for all fibers over a dense open subscheme of the base, by semi-continuity). Thus the assertion (4) follows from Theorem 4.1.10. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.