ScalingStacks

B.3. Multiplier ideals [01I1]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

B.3. Multiplier ideals

Let us first give the definition of multiplier ideals in our setting:

Definition B.4.

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model and let π”ž\mathfrak{a} be a vertical ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X}. For each rational number c>0c>0 the multiplier ideal of π”žc\mathfrak{a}^{c} is the vertical ideal sheaf of 𝒳\mathcal{X} defined as

π’₯⁑(π”žc):=Ο€βˆ—β€‹π’ͺ𝒳′​(K𝒳′/π’³βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c}):=\pi_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(K_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}/\mathcal{X}}-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)

where Ο€:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} is a vertical blow-up with 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} SNC such that Ο€βˆ’1β€‹π”žβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳′\pi^{-1}\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}} is locally principal and D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}) is the corresponding effective Cartier divisor.

This definition only depends on the model function c​log⁑|π”ž|c\log|\mathfrak{a}| (cf.Β [JM11]), and would in fact make sense for an arbitrary non-positive model function Ο†βˆˆπ’Ÿβ‘(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{D}(X).

If π”žβˆ™\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of ideals as above then π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™c)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{c}) is defined as the largest element of the family of coherent ideals π’₯⁑(π”žmc/m)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{m}^{c/m}), mβ‰₯1m\geq 1.

As a matter of terminology, if β„’\mathcal{L} is a line bundle on a model 𝒳\mathcal{X}, π”ž\mathfrak{a} is a vertical coherent ideal sheaf and c>0c>0 then we shall say that β„’βŠ—π”žc\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef if Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’βˆ’c​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-cD is nef, where Ο€:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} is the normalization of the blow-up of 𝒳\mathcal{X} along π”ž\mathfrak{a} and π”žβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳′=π’ͺ𝒳′​(βˆ’D)\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D). In other words, the model function c​log⁑|π”ž|c\log|\mathfrak{a}| is required to be ΞΈ\theta-psh, where ΞΈ\theta is the curvature form of the model metric on LL induced by β„’\mathcal{L}.

Using TheoremΒ B.3 we may follow the usual line of arguments to prove the following basic vanishing property of multiplier ideals:

Theorem B.5 (Nadel Vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model of XX and β„’βˆˆPic⁑(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) a line bundle whose restriction to XX is ample. If π”ž\mathfrak{a} is a vertical coherent ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and c>0c>0 is a rational number such that β„’βŠ—π”žc\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef, then we have

Hq​(𝒳,Ο‰π’³βŠ—β„’βŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žc))=0​ for all ​qβ‰₯1.H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.

In particular, if π”žβˆ™\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that β„’mβŠ—π”žm\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathfrak{a}_{m} is globally generated for all sufficiently divisible mm, then

Hq​(𝒳,Ο‰π’³βŠ—β„’βŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™))=0​ for all ​qβ‰₯1.H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

Let Ο€:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} be an SNC model dominating the blow-up of 𝒳\mathcal{X} along π”žm\mathfrak{a}_{m}, so that we have π”žmβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳′=π’ͺ𝒳′​(βˆ’D)\mathfrak{a}_{m}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D) for some effective divisor D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). By the projection formula we have

Ο‰π’³βŠ—β„’βŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žc)=Ο€βˆ—β€‹(Ο‰π’³β€²βŠ—Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)).\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})=\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor)\right).

Now Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’βˆ’1m​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-\tfrac{1}{m}D is nef and c​Dβˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹c\,D-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor has coefficients in [0,1[[0,1[. LemmaΒ B.6 below together with the projection formula yields

Rqβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹(Ο‰π’³β€²βŠ—Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹))=0​ for all ​qβ‰₯1.R^{q}\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.

The Leray spectral sequence is thus degenerate and we conclude using Theorem B.3. ∎

Lemma B.6 (Local vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model, let π”ž\mathfrak{a} be a vertical ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and let Ο€:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} be an SNC model such that π”žβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳′=π’ͺ𝒳′​(βˆ’D)\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D) with D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). Then we have

Rqβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’³β€²β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)=0​ for all ​qβ‰₯1.R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

We argue as in the last part of the proof of TheoremΒ B.3. Let π’œβˆˆPic⁑(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) be sufficiently ample to guarantee:

  • (i)

    Ο€βˆ—β€‹π’œβˆ’c​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{A}-cD is nef.

  • (ii)

    π’œβŠ—Rqβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’³β€²β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right) is globally generated on 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

  • (iii)

    Hp​(𝒳,π’œβŠ—Rmβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’³β€²β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹))=0​ for all ​pβ‰₯1​ and ​mβ‰₯0H^{p}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{m}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }p\geq 1\text{ and }m\geq 0.

Note that the first condition can be achieved since βˆ’D-D is Ο€\pi-globally generated. The degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence shows that

H0​(𝒳,π’œβŠ—Rqβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’³β€²β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹))=Hq​(𝒳′,ω𝒳′​(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)βŠ—Ο€βˆ—β€‹π’œ),H^{0}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{A}\right),

which vanishes by TheoremΒ B.3. It follows that π’œβŠ—Rqβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’³β€²β€‹(βˆ’βŒŠc​DβŒ‹)=0\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)=0 by global generation, whence the result. ∎

We may now deduce from the above results the following two consequences that we need in the proof of Theorem B.

Theorem B.7 (Subadditivity).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model, π”ž,π”Ÿ\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{b} vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and c,d>0c,d>0. Then we have

π’₯⁑(π”žcβ‹…π”Ÿd)βŠ‚π’₯⁑(π”žc)β‹…π’₯⁑(π”Ÿd).\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c}\cdot\mathfrak{b}^{d})\subset\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\cdot\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{b}^{d}).
Proof.

This is proved exactly as in [Laz, Theorem 9.5.20] using local vanishing. (See also [JM11, Theorem A.2] for a different proof.) ∎

Theorem B.8 (Uniform generation property).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model. Then there exists an ample line bundle π’œ\mathcal{A} on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that the following holds. Given β„’βˆˆPic⁑(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}), a vertical ideal sheaf π”ž\mathfrak{a} and a rational number c>0c>0 such that β„’βŠ—π”žc\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef, the sheaf

π’œβŠ—β„’βŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žc)\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})

is globally generated. In particular, if π”žβˆ™\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that β„’mβŠ—π”žm\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathfrak{a}_{m} is globally generated for all sufficiently divisible mm, then

π’œβŠ—β„’mβŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m)\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})

is globally generated for all mm.

Proof.

Let ℬ\mathcal{B} be a given very ample line bundle such that π’œ:=Ο‰π’³βŠ—β„¬n+1\mathcal{A}:=\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{B}^{n+1} is ample. By the Castelnuovo-Mumford criterion it is enough to check that

Hq​(𝒳,π’œβŠ—β„’βŠ—β„¬βˆ’qβŠ—π’₯⁑(π”žc))=0H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{B}^{-q}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\right)=0

for q=1,…,nq=1,\dots,n, and this is a consequence of TheoremΒ B.5. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.