B.2. Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing [01HW]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
B.2. Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing
We next explain how to infer from Theorem B.1 a version of the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem on SNC models. We rely as usual on the “covering trick” and basically follow the proof of [KM98, Theorem 2.64] but provide some details for the convenience of the reader.
Lemma B.2 (Covering trick).
Assume that is algebraically closed. Let be an SNC -variety and denote by the set of irreducible components of . Let also and . Then there exists an SNC -scheme and a finite surjective morphism such that is divisible by in and is smooth over (but possibly disconnected) for all .
We emphasize that the generic fiber of is a finite cover of the generic fiber of .
Proof.
Writing for some sufficiently ample reduces us to the case where is very ample. We then get a closed embedding over such that coincides with the restriction of . Let be the morphism , which satisfies . For each set and consider with the finite surjective morphism , so that is divisible by in .
Applying Kleiman’s Bertini-type theorem (cf. [Har77, III.10.8]) to the smooth -varieties for all subsets shows that we may choose such that each is smooth over and has simple normal crossings. This implies in particular that is an SNC model. ∎
Theorem B.3 (Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing).
Let be an SNC model of . Let be a line bundle whose restriction to the generic fiber is ample and such that is nef for some with coefficients in . Then we have
Proof.
As in Theorem B.1 the desired result is equivalent to for by relative duality. By flat base change we may assume that is algebraically closed.
Step 1. Assume first that is ample. Let be the components of and set . Choose such that . By Lemma B.2 there exists an SNC -variety with a finite surjective morphism such that is smooth (possibly disconnected) for each , is SNC and is given as the zero divisor of a section for some . Note that is a direct summand of thanks to the trace map. Now let
be the cyclic cover associated with , where is endowed with the -algebra structure induced by . By definition there is a finite surjective morphism which satisfies
If we set
we thus have
But is less than by assumption, and we thus see that contains , hence also , as a direct summand.
Since is smooth for each and has normal crossings with , one sees as in [KM98, Claim 2.65] that is smooth for each and has SNC support, so that is an SNC -scheme. Finally is -linearly equivalent to , hence is ample.
We now use Lemma B.2 to find such that is smooth for all , is SNC and is divisible in by the denominator of . We then perform the same cyclic cover construction as above. Iterating the whole process finally yields an SNC -variety with an ample line bundle such that is a direct summand of , and we conclude by Theorem B.1.
Step 2. We now consider the general case where is merely nef. Since is ample by assumption there exists a vertical blow-up with SNC and a vertical -exceptional effective -divisor such that is ample. This condition implies in particular that is -ample. If we fix rational so that has coefficients then is also ample since is nef, and we get
by Step 1.
We are next going to show that for each . Since we have (the relative canonical bundle is -exceptional and effective since is regular), the degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence of will then yield as desired
for . Let us now prove the claim. Given choose sufficiently ample to guarantee that is globally generated on and
(note that we are only imposing finitely many non-trivial conditions). The degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence yields
for by Step 1 again, since is also ample. It follows that by global generation, which proves the claim since is invertible. ∎