ScalingStacks

B.2. Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing [01HW]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

B.2. Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing

We next explain how to infer from Theorem B.1 a version of the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem on SNC models. We rely as usual on the “covering trick” and basically follow the proof of [KM98, Theorem 2.64] but provide some details for the convenience of the reader.

Lemma B.2 (Covering trick).

Assume that kk is algebraically closed. Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an SNC SS-variety and denote by (Ei)i∈I(E_{i})_{i\in I} the set of irreducible components of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}. Let also ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) and m∈𝐍∗m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}. Then there exists an SNC SS-scheme 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} and a finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} such that ρ∗​ℒ\rho^{*}\mathcal{L} is divisible by mm in Pic⁡(𝒳′)\Pic(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}) and ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth over kk (but possibly disconnected) for all i∈Ii\in I.

We emphasize that the generic fiber of 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} is a finite cover of the generic fiber of 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

Proof.

Writing ℒ=(𝒜+ℒ)−𝒜\mathcal{L}=(\mathcal{A}+\mathcal{L})-\mathcal{A} for some sufficiently ample 𝒜∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) reduces us to the case where ℒ\mathcal{L} is very ample. We then get a closed embedding i:𝒳↪𝐏kN×kSi:\mathcal{X}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k}\times_{k}S over SS such that ℒ\mathcal{L} coincides with the restriction of 𝒪⁡(1)\mathcal{O}(1). Let π:𝐏kN→𝐏kN\pi:\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k}\to\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k} be the morphism [X0:…:XN]↦[X0m:…:XNm][X_{0}:\dots:X_{N}]\mapsto[X_{0}^{m}:\dots:X_{N}^{m}], which satisfies π∗​𝒪​(1)=𝒪⁡(m)\pi^{*}\mathcal{O}(1)=\mathcal{O}(m). For each σ∈PGL⁡(N+1,k)\sigma\in\mathrm{PGL}(N+1,k) set iσ:=σ∘ii_{\sigma}:=\sigma\circ i and consider 𝒳′:=𝒳×iσπ\mathcal{X}^{\prime}:=\mathcal{X}\times_{i_{\sigma}}\pi with the finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X}, so that ρ∗​ℒ=𝒪⁡(m)|𝒴\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}(m)|_{\mathcal{Y}} is divisible by mm in Pic⁡(𝒴)\Pic(\mathcal{Y}).

Applying Kleiman’s Bertini-type theorem (cf. [Har77, III.10.8]) to the smooth kk-varieties EJ=⋂j∈JEjE_{J}=\bigcap_{j\in J}E_{j} for all subsets J⊂IJ\subset I shows that we may choose σ∈PGL⁡(N+1,k)\sigma\in\mathrm{PGL}(N+1,k) such that each ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth over kk and ∑iρ∗​Ei\sum_{i}\rho^{*}E_{i} has simple normal crossings. This implies in particular that 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} is an SNC model. ∎

Theorem B.3 (Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an SNC model of XX. Let ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) be a line bundle whose restriction to the generic fiber XX is ample and such that ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is nef for some D∈Div0⁡(𝒳)𝐐D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{Q}} with coefficients in [0,1[[0,1[. Then we have

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ)=0​ for all ​q≥1.H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

As in Theorem B.1 the desired result is equivalent to Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1})=0 for q<nq<n by relative duality. By flat base change we may assume that kk is algebraically closed.

Step 1. Assume first that ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is ample. Let E1,…,ENE_{1},\dots,E_{N} be the components of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} and set ai:=ordEi⁡Da_{i}:=\ord_{E_{i}}D. Choose m∈𝐍∗m\in\mathbf{N}^{*} such that b:=m​a1∈𝐍b:=m\,a_{1}\in\mathbf{N}. By Lemma B.2 there exists an SNC SS-variety 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} with a finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} such that ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth (possibly disconnected) for each ii, ∑iρ∗​Ei\sum_{i}\rho^{*}E_{i} is SNC and ρ∗​E1\rho^{*}E_{1} is given as the zero divisor of a section s∈H0​(𝒳′,ℳm)s\in H^{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\mathcal{M}^{m}) for some ℳ∈Pic⁡(𝒳′)\mathcal{M}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). Note that Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}) is a direct summand of Hq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}) thanks to the trace map. Now let

𝒳1:=Spec𝒳′⁡(⨁0≤j<mℳ−j)\mathcal{X}_{1}:=\spec_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j}\right)

be the cyclic cover associated with s∈H0​(𝒳′,ℳm)s\in H^{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\mathcal{M}^{m}), where ⨁0≤j<mℳ−j\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j} is endowed with the 𝒪𝒳′\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}-algebra structure induced by ss. By definition there is a finite surjective morphism τ:𝒳1→𝒳′\tau:\mathcal{X}_{1}\to\mathcal{X}^{\prime} which satisfies

τ∗​𝒪𝒳1=⨁0≤j<mℳ−j.\tau_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{1}}=\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j}.

If we set

ℒ1:=τ∗​(ρ∗​ℒ⊗ℳ−b)\mathcal{L}_{1}:=\tau^{*}\left(\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{M}^{-b}\right)

we thus have

Hq​(𝒳1,ℒ1−1)≃⨁0≤j<mHq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1⊗ℳb−j).H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}_{1},\mathcal{L}_{1}^{-1}\right)\simeq\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}\otimes\mathcal{M}^{b-j}\right).

But b/m=a1b/m=a_{1} is less than 11 by assumption, and we thus see that Hq​(𝒳1,ℒ1−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}_{1},\mathcal{L}_{1}^{-1}) contains Hq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}), hence also Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}), as a direct summand.

Since ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}{E_{i}} is smooth for each ii and ∑i=2Nρ∗​Ei\sum_{i=2}^{N}\rho^{*}E_{i} has normal crossings with div⁡(s)=ρ∗​E1\mathrm{div}(s)=\rho^{*}E_{1}, one sees as in [KM98, Claim 2.65] that Ei(1):=τ∗​ρ∗​EiE_{i}^{(1)}:=\tau^{*}\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth for each ii and 𝒳1,0\mathcal{X}_{1,0} has SNC support, so that 𝒳1\mathcal{X}_{1} is an SNC SS-scheme. Finally ℒ1−∑i=2Nai​Ei(1)\mathcal{L}_{1}-\sum_{i=2}^{N}a_{i}E_{i}^{(1)} is 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-linearly equivalent to τ∗​ρ∗​(ℒ−D)\tau^{*}\rho^{*}(\mathcal{L}-D), hence is ample.

We now use Lemma B.2 to find c1:𝒳1′→𝒳1c_{1}:\mathcal{X}_{1}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X}_{1} such that c1∗​Ei(1)c_{1}^{*}E_{i}^{(1)} is smooth for all ii, ∑ic1∗​Ei(1)\sum_{i}c_{1}^{*}E_{i}^{(1)} is SNC and c1∗​E2(1)c_{1}^{*}E_{2}^{(1)} is divisible in Pic⁡(𝒳1′)\Pic(\mathcal{X}_{1}^{\prime}) by the denominator of a2a_{2}. We then perform the same cyclic cover construction as above. Iterating the whole process finally yields an SNC SS-variety 𝒳N\mathcal{X}_{N} with an ample line bundle ℒN\mathcal{L}_{N} such that Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}) is a direct summand of Hq​(𝒳N,ℒN−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}_{N},\mathcal{L}_{N}^{-1}), and we conclude by Theorem B.1.

Step 2. We now consider the general case where ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is merely nef. Since ℒ|X\mathcal{L}|_{X} is ample by assumption there exists a vertical blow-up π:𝒴→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{X} with 𝒴\mathcal{Y} SNC and a vertical π\pi-exceptional effective 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-divisor E∈Div0⁡(𝒴)𝐐E\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{Y})_{\mathbf{Q}} such that π∗​ℒ−E\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-E is ample. This condition implies in particular that −E-E is π\pi-ample. If we fix 0<ε≪10<\varepsilon\ll 1 rational so that ε​E\varepsilon E has coefficients <1<1 then π∗​ℒ−ε​E=(1−ε)​π∗​ℒ+ε⁡(π∗​ℒ−E)\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-\varepsilon E=(1-\varepsilon)\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}+\varepsilon(\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-E) is also ample since π∗​ℒ\pi^{*}\mathcal{L} is nef, and we get

Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0​ for all ​q≥1H^{q}(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1

by Step 1.

We are next going to show that Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0 for each q≥1q\geq 1. Since we have π∗​ω𝒴=ω𝒳\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}=\omega_{\mathcal{X}} (the relative canonical bundle K𝒴/𝒳K_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{X}} is π\pi-exceptional and effective since 𝒳\mathcal{X} is regular), the degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence of π\pi will then yield as desired

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ)≃Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})\simeq H^{q}(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0

for q≥1q\geq 1. Let us now prove the claim. Given q≥1q\geq 1 choose 𝒜∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) sufficiently ample to guarantee that 𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}) is globally generated on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and

Hp​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rm​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ))=0​ for all ​p≥1​ and ​m≥0H^{p}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{m}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }p\geq 1\text{ and }m\geq 0

(note that we are only imposing finitely many non-trivial conditions). The degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence yields

H0​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ))≃Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​(ℒ⊗𝒜))=0H^{0}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})\right)\simeq H^{q}\left(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}(\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{A})\right)=0

for q≥1q\geq 1 by Step 1 again, since π∗​(ℒ⊗𝒜)−ε​E\pi^{*}(\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{A})-\varepsilon E is also ample. It follows that 𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0 by global generation, which proves the claim since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is invertible. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.