ScalingStacks

Proof. [01HV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

By flat base change we may assume that kk is algebraically closed. All fibers of f:𝒳→Sf:\mathcal{X}\to S are Cohen-Macaulay since 𝒳\mathcal{X} is regular, and the desired result is equivalent to Rq​fβˆ—β€‹(Ο‰π’³βŠ—β„’)=0R^{q}f_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})=0 for qβ‰₯1q\geq 1 since SS is affine. We may therefore use relative duality for ff, which shows that the desired result is equivalent to Rq​fβˆ—β€‹β„’βˆ’1=0R^{q}f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}=0 for q<n=dimXq<n=\dim X.

Let dβˆˆπβˆ—d\in\mathbf{N}^{*} be a common multiple of the multiplicities of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}, set Sd:=Spec⁑k⁑[[t1/d]]S_{d}:=\spec k[[t^{1/d}]] and let 𝒴\mathcal{Y} be the normalization of 𝒳×SSd\mathcal{X}\times_{S}S_{d}, with structure map g:𝒴→Sg:\mathcal{Y}\to S. The pull-back β„³\mathcal{M} of β„’\mathcal{L} to 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is still ample since 𝒴→𝒳\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{X} is finite. ByΒ [KKMS, pp.200–201] the SS-scheme 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is toroidal and its special fiber 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} is reduced.

The relative trace Tr𝒴/𝒳\tr_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{X}} shows that Rq​gβˆ—β€‹β„³βˆ’1R^{q}g_{*}\mathcal{M}^{-1} contains Rq​fβˆ—β€‹β„’βˆ’1R^{q}f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1} as a direct summand, and it is therefore enough to show by semicontinuity that Hq​(𝒴0,β„³βˆ’1)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{Y}_{0},\mathcal{M}^{-1})=0 for q<nq<n. Like any toroidal SS-scheme, 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is Cohen-Macaulay. As a consequence, the Cartier divisor 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} is Cohen-Macaulay as well. By another application of duality, this time on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}, we are reduced to showing that Hq​(𝒴0,ω𝒴0βŠ—β„³)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{Y}_{0},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}\otimes\mathcal{M})=0 for qβ‰₯1q\geq 1.

ByΒ [KKMS] we may choose a toroidal vertical blow-up Ο€:𝒴′→𝒴\pi:\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{Y} such that 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} has simple normal crossing support. A toric computation (compareΒ [Kol97, Proposition 3.7]) shows that

Ο‰π’΄β€²βŠ—π’ͺ𝒴′​(𝒴0,redβ€²)β‰ƒΟ€βˆ—β€‹(Ο‰π’΄βŠ—π’ͺ𝒴​(𝒴0)).\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}}(\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}})\simeq\pi^{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}}(\mathcal{Y}_{0})\right).

Since 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} and 𝒴0,redβ€²\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}} are Cartier divisors on 𝒴\mathcal{Y} and 𝒴′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime} respectively, adjunction applies (see for instanceΒ [KM98, Proposition 5.73]) and we get ω𝒴0,redβ€²β‰ƒΟ€βˆ—β€‹Ο‰π’΄0\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}}\simeq\pi^{*}\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}. On the other hand the projective reduced (but a priori reducible) kk-scheme 𝒴0,redβ€²\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}} has embedded SNC singularities. It is indeed an SNC divisor in 𝒴′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}, andΒ [Art69] implies that the existence of an algebraic kk-variety containing 𝒴0β€²\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0} as a divisor. Since Ο€:𝒴0,red′→𝒴0\pi:\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}\to\mathcal{Y}_{0} is projective and β„³\mathcal{M} is ample on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}, we may therefore apply a vanishing theorem originally due to Kawamata and Ambro and corrected by Fujino ([Kaw85, Theorem 4.4],Β [Amb03, Theorem 3.2] andΒ [Fuj09, Theorem 2.39]) to get that

Ο€βˆ—β€‹(ω𝒴0,redβ€²βŠ—Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„³)≃ω𝒴0βŠ—β„³\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{M}\right)\simeq\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}\otimes\mathcal{M}

is acyclic on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.