ScalingStacks

Appendix B Multiplier ideals on S -varieties [01HS]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Appendix B Multiplier ideals on SS-varieties

The purpose of this section is to define multiplier ideals on regular SS-varieties and establish their basic properties. We are grateful to Osamu Fujino, János Kollár and Mircea Mustaţǎ for their helpful suggestions.

In this appendix, and as opposed to the main body of the article, it will be more convenient to use multiplicative notation for Picard groups. We also fix the choice of an isomorphism R≃k⁡[[t]]R\simeq k[\![t]\!].

B.1. Kodaira vanishing

The usual compactification argument that reduces the relative version of Kodaira (or Kawamata-Viehweg) vanishing to its global projective version over kk cannot be applied for SS-varieties. Following suggestions of János Kollár and Mircea Mustaţǎ we rely instead on a Kodaira vanishing-type theorem on the (possibly reducible) special fiber.

In the sequel, ω𝒳\omega_{\mathcal{X}} denotes the dualizing sheaf on an SS-variety 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

Theorem B.1 (Kodaira vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an SNC SS-variety and ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) an ample line bundle. Then we have

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ)=0for all q≥1.H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\right)=0\quad\text{for all $q\geq 1$}.
Proof.

By flat base change we may assume that kk is algebraically closed. All fibers of f:𝒳→Sf:\mathcal{X}\to S are Cohen-Macaulay since 𝒳\mathcal{X} is regular, and the desired result is equivalent to Rq​f∗​(ω𝒳⊗ℒ)=0R^{q}f_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})=0 for q≥1q\geq 1 since SS is affine. We may therefore use relative duality for ff, which shows that the desired result is equivalent to Rq​f∗​ℒ−1=0R^{q}f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}=0 for q<n=dimXq<n=\dim X.

Let d∈𝐍∗d\in\mathbf{N}^{*} be a common multiple of the multiplicities of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}, set Sd:=Spec⁡k⁡[[t1/d]]S_{d}:=\spec k[[t^{1/d}]] and let 𝒴\mathcal{Y} be the normalization of 𝒳×SSd\mathcal{X}\times_{S}S_{d}, with structure map g:𝒴→Sg:\mathcal{Y}\to S. The pull-back ℳ\mathcal{M} of ℒ\mathcal{L} to 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is still ample since 𝒴→𝒳\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{X} is finite. By [KKMS, pp.200–201] the SS-scheme 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is toroidal and its special fiber 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} is reduced.

The relative trace Tr𝒴/𝒳\tr_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{X}} shows that Rq​g∗​ℳ−1R^{q}g_{*}\mathcal{M}^{-1} contains Rq​f∗​ℒ−1R^{q}f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1} as a direct summand, and it is therefore enough to show by semicontinuity that Hq​(𝒴0,ℳ−1)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{Y}_{0},\mathcal{M}^{-1})=0 for q<nq<n. Like any toroidal SS-scheme, 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is Cohen-Macaulay. As a consequence, the Cartier divisor 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} is Cohen-Macaulay as well. By another application of duality, this time on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}, we are reduced to showing that Hq​(𝒴0,ω𝒴0⊗ℳ)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{Y}_{0},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}\otimes\mathcal{M})=0 for q≥1q\geq 1.

By [KKMS] we may choose a toroidal vertical blow-up π:𝒴′→𝒴\pi:\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{Y} such that 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} has simple normal crossing support. A toric computation (compare [Kol97, Proposition 3.7]) shows that

ω𝒴′⊗𝒪𝒴′​(𝒴0,red′)≃π∗​(ω𝒴⊗𝒪𝒴​(𝒴0)).\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}}(\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}})\simeq\pi^{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}}(\mathcal{Y}_{0})\right).

Since 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0} and 𝒴0,red′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}} are Cartier divisors on 𝒴\mathcal{Y} and 𝒴′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime} respectively, adjunction applies (see for instance [KM98, Proposition 5.73]) and we get ω𝒴0,red′≃π∗​ω𝒴0\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}}\simeq\pi^{*}\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}. On the other hand the projective reduced (but a priori reducible) kk-scheme 𝒴0,red′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}} has embedded SNC singularities. It is indeed an SNC divisor in 𝒴′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}, and [Art69] implies that the existence of an algebraic kk-variety containing 𝒴0′\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0} as a divisor. Since π:𝒴0,red′→𝒴0\pi:\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}\to\mathcal{Y}_{0} is projective and ℳ\mathcal{M} is ample on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}, we may therefore apply a vanishing theorem originally due to Kawamata and Ambro and corrected by Fujino ([Kaw85, Theorem 4.4], [Amb03, Theorem 3.2] and [Fuj09, Theorem 2.39]) to get that

π∗​(ω𝒴0,red′⊗π∗​ℳ)≃ω𝒴0⊗ℳ\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}_{0,\mathrm{red}}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{M}\right)\simeq\omega_{\mathcal{Y}_{0}}\otimes\mathcal{M}

is acyclic on 𝒴0\mathcal{Y}_{0}. ∎

B.2. Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing

We next explain how to infer from Theorem B.1 a version of the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem on SNC models. We rely as usual on the “covering trick” and basically follow the proof of [KM98, Theorem 2.64] but provide some details for the convenience of the reader.

Lemma B.2 (Covering trick).

Assume that kk is algebraically closed. Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an SNC SS-variety and denote by (Ei)i∈I(E_{i})_{i\in I} the set of irreducible components of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}. Let also ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) and m∈𝐍∗m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}. Then there exists an SNC SS-scheme 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} and a finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} such that ρ∗​ℒ\rho^{*}\mathcal{L} is divisible by mm in Pic⁡(𝒳′)\Pic(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}) and ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth over kk (but possibly disconnected) for all i∈Ii\in I.

We emphasize that the generic fiber of 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} is a finite cover of the generic fiber of 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

Proof.

Writing ℒ=(𝒜+ℒ)−𝒜\mathcal{L}=(\mathcal{A}+\mathcal{L})-\mathcal{A} for some sufficiently ample 𝒜∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) reduces us to the case where ℒ\mathcal{L} is very ample. We then get a closed embedding i:𝒳↪𝐏kN×kSi:\mathcal{X}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k}\times_{k}S over SS such that ℒ\mathcal{L} coincides with the restriction of 𝒪⁡(1)\mathcal{O}(1). Let π:𝐏kN→𝐏kN\pi:\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k}\to\mathbf{P}^{N}_{k} be the morphism [X0:…:XN]↦[X0m:…:XNm][X_{0}:\dots:X_{N}]\mapsto[X_{0}^{m}:\dots:X_{N}^{m}], which satisfies π∗​𝒪​(1)=𝒪⁡(m)\pi^{*}\mathcal{O}(1)=\mathcal{O}(m). For each σ∈PGL⁡(N+1,k)\sigma\in\mathrm{PGL}(N+1,k) set iσ:=σ∘ii_{\sigma}:=\sigma\circ i and consider 𝒳′:=𝒳×iσπ\mathcal{X}^{\prime}:=\mathcal{X}\times_{i_{\sigma}}\pi with the finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X}, so that ρ∗​ℒ=𝒪⁡(m)|𝒴\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}(m)|_{\mathcal{Y}} is divisible by mm in Pic⁡(𝒴)\Pic(\mathcal{Y}).

Applying Kleiman’s Bertini-type theorem (cf. [Har77, III.10.8]) to the smooth kk-varieties EJ=⋂j∈JEjE_{J}=\bigcap_{j\in J}E_{j} for all subsets J⊂IJ\subset I shows that we may choose σ∈PGL⁡(N+1,k)\sigma\in\mathrm{PGL}(N+1,k) such that each ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth over kk and ∑iρ∗​Ei\sum_{i}\rho^{*}E_{i} has simple normal crossings. This implies in particular that 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} is an SNC model. ∎

Theorem B.3 (Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an SNC model of XX. Let ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) be a line bundle whose restriction to the generic fiber XX is ample and such that ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is nef for some D∈Div0⁡(𝒳)𝐐D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{Q}} with coefficients in [0,1[[0,1[. Then we have

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ)=0​ for all ​q≥1.H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

As in Theorem B.1 the desired result is equivalent to Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1})=0 for q<nq<n by relative duality. By flat base change we may assume that kk is algebraically closed.

Step 1. Assume first that ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is ample. Let E1,…,ENE_{1},\dots,E_{N} be the components of 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0} and set ai:=ordEi⁡Da_{i}:=\ord_{E_{i}}D. Choose m∈𝐍∗m\in\mathbf{N}^{*} such that b:=m​a1∈𝐍b:=m\,a_{1}\in\mathbf{N}. By Lemma B.2 there exists an SNC SS-variety 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} with a finite surjective morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} such that ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth (possibly disconnected) for each ii, ∑iρ∗​Ei\sum_{i}\rho^{*}E_{i} is SNC and ρ∗​E1\rho^{*}E_{1} is given as the zero divisor of a section s∈H0​(𝒳′,ℳm)s\in H^{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\mathcal{M}^{m}) for some ℳ∈Pic⁡(𝒳′)\mathcal{M}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). Note that Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}) is a direct summand of Hq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}) thanks to the trace map. Now let

𝒳1:=Spec𝒳′⁡(⨁0≤j<mℳ−j)\mathcal{X}_{1}:=\spec_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j}\right)

be the cyclic cover associated with s∈H0​(𝒳′,ℳm)s\in H^{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\mathcal{M}^{m}), where ⨁0≤j<mℳ−j\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j} is endowed with the 𝒪𝒳′\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}-algebra structure induced by ss. By definition there is a finite surjective morphism τ:𝒳1→𝒳′\tau:\mathcal{X}_{1}\to\mathcal{X}^{\prime} which satisfies

τ∗​𝒪𝒳1=⨁0≤j<mℳ−j.\tau_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{1}}=\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}\mathcal{M}^{-j}.

If we set

ℒ1:=τ∗​(ρ∗​ℒ⊗ℳ−b)\mathcal{L}_{1}:=\tau^{*}\left(\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{M}^{-b}\right)

we thus have

Hq​(𝒳1,ℒ1−1)≃⨁0≤j<mHq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1⊗ℳb−j).H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}_{1},\mathcal{L}_{1}^{-1}\right)\simeq\bigoplus_{0\leq j<m}H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}\otimes\mathcal{M}^{b-j}\right).

But b/m=a1b/m=a_{1} is less than 11 by assumption, and we thus see that Hq​(𝒳1,ℒ1−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}_{1},\mathcal{L}_{1}^{-1}) contains Hq​(𝒳′,ρ∗​ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\rho^{*}\mathcal{L}^{-1}), hence also Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}), as a direct summand.

Since ρ∗​Ei\rho^{*}{E_{i}} is smooth for each ii and ∑i=2Nρ∗​Ei\sum_{i=2}^{N}\rho^{*}E_{i} has normal crossings with div⁡(s)=ρ∗​E1\mathrm{div}(s)=\rho^{*}E_{1}, one sees as in [KM98, Claim 2.65] that Ei(1):=τ∗​ρ∗​EiE_{i}^{(1)}:=\tau^{*}\rho^{*}E_{i} is smooth for each ii and 𝒳1,0\mathcal{X}_{1,0} has SNC support, so that 𝒳1\mathcal{X}_{1} is an SNC SS-scheme. Finally ℒ1−∑i=2Nai​Ei(1)\mathcal{L}_{1}-\sum_{i=2}^{N}a_{i}E_{i}^{(1)} is 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-linearly equivalent to τ∗​ρ∗​(ℒ−D)\tau^{*}\rho^{*}(\mathcal{L}-D), hence is ample.

We now use Lemma B.2 to find c1:𝒳1′→𝒳1c_{1}:\mathcal{X}_{1}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X}_{1} such that c1∗​Ei(1)c_{1}^{*}E_{i}^{(1)} is smooth for all ii, ∑ic1∗​Ei(1)\sum_{i}c_{1}^{*}E_{i}^{(1)} is SNC and c1∗​E2(1)c_{1}^{*}E_{2}^{(1)} is divisible in Pic⁡(𝒳1′)\Pic(\mathcal{X}_{1}^{\prime}) by the denominator of a2a_{2}. We then perform the same cyclic cover construction as above. Iterating the whole process finally yields an SNC SS-variety 𝒳N\mathcal{X}_{N} with an ample line bundle ℒN\mathcal{L}_{N} such that Hq​(𝒳,ℒ−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}^{-1}) is a direct summand of Hq​(𝒳N,ℒN−1)H^{q}(\mathcal{X}_{N},\mathcal{L}_{N}^{-1}), and we conclude by Theorem B.1.

Step 2. We now consider the general case where ℒ−D\mathcal{L}-D is merely nef. Since ℒ|X\mathcal{L}|_{X} is ample by assumption there exists a vertical blow-up π:𝒴→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{X} with 𝒴\mathcal{Y} SNC and a vertical π\pi-exceptional effective 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-divisor E∈Div0⁡(𝒴)𝐐E\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{Y})_{\mathbf{Q}} such that π∗​ℒ−E\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-E is ample. This condition implies in particular that −E-E is π\pi-ample. If we fix 0<ε≪10<\varepsilon\ll 1 rational so that ε​E\varepsilon E has coefficients <1<1 then π∗​ℒ−ε​E=(1−ε)​π∗​ℒ+ε⁡(π∗​ℒ−E)\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-\varepsilon E=(1-\varepsilon)\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}+\varepsilon(\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-E) is also ample since π∗​ℒ\pi^{*}\mathcal{L} is nef, and we get

Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0​ for all ​q≥1H^{q}(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1

by Step 1.

We are next going to show that Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0 for each q≥1q\geq 1. Since we have π∗​ω𝒴=ω𝒳\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}=\omega_{\mathcal{X}} (the relative canonical bundle K𝒴/𝒳K_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{X}} is π\pi-exceptional and effective since 𝒳\mathcal{X} is regular), the degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence of π\pi will then yield as desired

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ)≃Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0H^{q}(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L})\simeq H^{q}(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0

for q≥1q\geq 1. Let us now prove the claim. Given q≥1q\geq 1 choose 𝒜∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) sufficiently ample to guarantee that 𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}) is globally generated on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and

Hp​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rm​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ))=0​ for all ​p≥1​ and ​m≥0H^{p}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{m}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }p\geq 1\text{ and }m\geq 0

(note that we are only imposing finitely many non-trivial conditions). The degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence yields

H0​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ))≃Hq​(𝒴,ω𝒴⊗π∗​(ℒ⊗𝒜))=0H^{0}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})\right)\simeq H^{q}\left(\mathcal{Y},\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}(\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{A})\right)=0

for q≥1q\geq 1 by Step 1 again, since π∗​(ℒ⊗𝒜)−ε​E\pi^{*}(\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{A})-\varepsilon E is also ample. It follows that 𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​(ω𝒴⊗π∗​ℒ)=0\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}(\omega_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L})=0 by global generation, which proves the claim since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is invertible. ∎

B.3. Multiplier ideals

Let us first give the definition of multiplier ideals in our setting:

Definition B.4.

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model and let 𝔞\mathfrak{a} be a vertical ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X}. For each rational number c>0c>0 the multiplier ideal of 𝔞c\mathfrak{a}^{c} is the vertical ideal sheaf of 𝒳\mathcal{X} defined as

𝒥⁡(𝔞c):=π∗​𝒪𝒳′​(K𝒳′/𝒳−⌊c​D⌋)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c}):=\pi_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(K_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}/\mathcal{X}}-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)

where π:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} is a vertical blow-up with 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} SNC such that π−1​𝔞⋅𝒪𝒳′\pi^{-1}\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}} is locally principal and D∈Div0⁡(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}) is the corresponding effective Cartier divisor.

This definition only depends on the model function c​log⁡|𝔞|c\log|\mathfrak{a}| (cf. [JM11]), and would in fact make sense for an arbitrary non-positive model function φ∈𝒟⁡(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{D}(X).

If 𝔞∙\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of ideals as above then 𝒥⁡(𝔞∙c)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{c}) is defined as the largest element of the family of coherent ideals 𝒥⁡(𝔞mc/m)\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{m}^{c/m}), m≥1m\geq 1.

As a matter of terminology, if ℒ\mathcal{L} is a line bundle on a model 𝒳\mathcal{X}, 𝔞\mathfrak{a} is a vertical coherent ideal sheaf and c>0c>0 then we shall say that ℒ⊗𝔞c\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef if π∗​ℒ−c​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-cD is nef, where π:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} is the normalization of the blow-up of 𝒳\mathcal{X} along 𝔞\mathfrak{a} and 𝔞⋅𝒪𝒳′=𝒪𝒳′​(−D)\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D). In other words, the model function c​log⁡|𝔞|c\log|\mathfrak{a}| is required to be θ\theta-psh, where θ\theta is the curvature form of the model metric on LL induced by ℒ\mathcal{L}.

Using Theorem B.3 we may follow the usual line of arguments to prove the following basic vanishing property of multiplier ideals:

Theorem B.5 (Nadel Vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model of XX and ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) a line bundle whose restriction to XX is ample. If 𝔞\mathfrak{a} is a vertical coherent ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and c>0c>0 is a rational number such that ℒ⊗𝔞c\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef, then we have

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞c))=0​ for all ​q≥1.H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.

In particular, if 𝔞∙\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that ℒm⊗𝔞m\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathfrak{a}_{m} is globally generated for all sufficiently divisible mm, then

Hq​(𝒳,ω𝒳⊗ℒ⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞∙))=0​ for all ​q≥1.H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet})\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

Let π:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} be an SNC model dominating the blow-up of 𝒳\mathcal{X} along 𝔞m\mathfrak{a}_{m}, so that we have 𝔞m⋅𝒪𝒳′=𝒪𝒳′​(−D)\mathfrak{a}_{m}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D) for some effective divisor D∈Div0⁡(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). By the projection formula we have

ω𝒳⊗ℒ⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞c)=π∗​(ω𝒳′⊗π∗​ℒ​(−⌊c​D⌋)).\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})=\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor)\right).

Now π∗​ℒ−1m​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}-\tfrac{1}{m}D is nef and c​D−⌊c​D⌋c\,D-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor has coefficients in [0,1[[0,1[. Lemma B.6 below together with the projection formula yields

Rq​π∗​(ω𝒳′⊗π∗​ℒ​(−⌊c​D⌋))=0​ for all ​q≥1.R^{q}\pi_{*}\left(\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.

The Leray spectral sequence is thus degenerate and we conclude using Theorem B.3. ∎

Lemma B.6 (Local vanishing).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model, let 𝔞\mathfrak{a} be a vertical ideal sheaf on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and let π:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} be an SNC model such that 𝔞⋅𝒪𝒳′=𝒪𝒳′​(−D)\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(-D) with D∈Div0⁡(𝒳′)D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}). Then we have

Rq​π∗​ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋)=0​ for all ​q≥1.R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }q\geq 1.
Proof.

We argue as in the last part of the proof of Theorem B.3. Let 𝒜∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) be sufficiently ample to guarantee:

  • (i)

    π∗​𝒜−c​D\pi^{*}\mathcal{A}-cD is nef.

  • (ii)

    𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋)\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right) is globally generated on 𝒳\mathcal{X}.

  • (iii)

    Hp​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rm​π∗​ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋))=0​ for all ​p≥1​ and ​m≥0H^{p}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{m}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=0\,\,\text{ for all }p\geq 1\text{ and }m\geq 0.

Note that the first condition can be achieved since −D-D is π\pi-globally generated. The degeneration of the Leray spectral sequence shows that

H0​(𝒳,𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋))=Hq​(𝒳′,ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋)⊗π∗​𝒜),H^{0}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\right)=H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)\otimes\pi^{*}\mathcal{A}\right),

which vanishes by Theorem B.3. It follows that 𝒜⊗Rq​π∗​ω𝒳′​(−⌊c​D⌋)=0\mathcal{A}\otimes R^{q}\pi_{*}\omega_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\left(-\lfloor c\,D\rfloor\right)=0 by global generation, whence the result. ∎

We may now deduce from the above results the following two consequences that we need in the proof of Theorem B.

Theorem B.7 (Subadditivity).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model, 𝔞,𝔟\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{b} vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and c,d>0c,d>0. Then we have

𝒥⁡(𝔞c⋅𝔟d)⊂𝒥⁡(𝔞c)⋅𝒥⁡(𝔟d).\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c}\cdot\mathfrak{b}^{d})\subset\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\cdot\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{b}^{d}).
Proof.

This is proved exactly as in [Laz, Theorem 9.5.20] using local vanishing. (See also [JM11, Theorem A.2] for a different proof.) ∎

Theorem B.8 (Uniform generation property).

Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be a regular model. Then there exists an ample line bundle 𝒜\mathcal{A} on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that the following holds. Given ℒ∈Pic⁡(𝒳)\mathcal{L}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}), a vertical ideal sheaf 𝔞\mathfrak{a} and a rational number c>0c>0 such that ℒ⊗𝔞c\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathfrak{a}^{c} is nef, the sheaf

𝒜⊗ℒ⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞c)\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})

is globally generated. In particular, if 𝔞∙\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} is a graded sequence of vertical coherent ideal sheaves on 𝒳\mathcal{X} such that ℒm⊗𝔞m\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathfrak{a}_{m} is globally generated for all sufficiently divisible mm, then

𝒜⊗ℒm⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞∙m)\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}^{m}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})

is globally generated for all mm.

Proof.

Let ℬ\mathcal{B} be a given very ample line bundle such that 𝒜:=ω𝒳⊗ℬn+1\mathcal{A}:=\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\otimes\mathcal{B}^{n+1} is ample. By the Castelnuovo-Mumford criterion it is enough to check that

Hq​(𝒳,𝒜⊗ℒ⊗ℬ−q⊗𝒥⁡(𝔞c))=0H^{q}\left(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{L}\otimes\mathcal{B}^{-q}\otimes\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}^{c})\right)=0

for q=1,…,nq=1,\dots,n, and this is a consequence of Theorem B.5. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.