ScalingStacks

Proof of Lemma 6.4 . [01GF]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof of Lemma 6.4.

We write v=∑j∈Jsj​ejv=\sum_{j\in J}s_{j}e_{j} with sj>0s_{j}>0 rational and ∑j∈Jsj=1\sum_{j\in J}s_{j}=1. Set si=0s_{i}=0 for i∈I∖Ji\in I\setminus J. For i∈Ii\in I let φi\varphi_{i} be the model function induced by the vertical divisor bi​Ei∈Div0⁡(𝒳)b_{i}E_{i}\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}). This function is affine on each face of Δ\Delta and satisfies φi​(ej)=δi​j\varphi_{i}(e_{j})=\delta_{ij} for all j∈Ij\in I. Since ej′=ε​ej+(1−ε)​ve^{\prime}_{j}=\varepsilon e_{j}+(1-\varepsilon)v for j∈Lj\in L we get:

φi​(ej′)={ε+(1−ε)​siif i=j∈J(1−ε)​siif i≠j∈Jεif i=j∈L∖J0if i≠j∈L∖J\varphi_{i}(e^{\prime}_{j})=\begin{cases}\varepsilon+(1-\varepsilon)s_{i}&\text{if $i=j\in J$}\\ (1-\varepsilon)s_{i}&\text{if $i\neq j\in J$}\\ \varepsilon&\text{if $i=j\in L\setminus J$}\\ 0&\text{if $i\neq j\in L\setminus J$}\end{cases}

By Theorem 3.11, Ej′E^{\prime}_{j} intersects EJ′E^{\prime}_{J} iff j∈Lj\in L. We thus have

ρ∗​(bi​Ei)|EJ′=∑j∈Lφi​(ej′)​bj′​Ej′|EJ′​for all i∈I\rho^{*}(b_{i}E_{i})|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}=\sum_{j\in L}\varphi_{i}(e^{\prime}_{j})b^{\prime}_{j}\,E^{\prime}_{j}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}\ \text{for all $i\in I$}

and

(μ∗​G−φ⁡(v)​ρ∗​𝒳0)|EJ′=∑j∈L(φ⁡(ej′)−φ⁡(v))​bj′​Ej′|EJ′(\mu_{*}G-\varphi(v)\rho^{*}\mathcal{X}_{0})|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}=\sum_{j\in L}(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{j})-\varphi(v))b^{\prime}_{j}\,E^{\prime}_{j}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}

in Pic⁡(EJ′)𝐐\Pic(E^{\prime}_{J})_{\mathbf{Q}}, where we have set bj′:=ordEj′⁡(t)b^{\prime}_{j}:=\ord_{E^{\prime}_{j}}(t).

Recall also that φ\varphi is affine on each segment [v,ei′][v,e^{\prime}_{i}], so that Dv​φ​(ei)=ε−1​(φ⁡(ei′)−φ⁡(v))D_{v}\varphi(e_{i})=\varepsilon^{-1}\left(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v)\right) for i∈Li\in L. We can now compute in Pic⁡(EJ′)𝐐\Pic(E^{\prime}_{J})_{\mathbf{Q}}

ρ∗​(∑i∈LDv​φ​(ei)​bi​Ei)|EJ′=∑i∈Lε−1​(φ⁡(ei′)−φ⁡(v))​(∑j∈Lφi​(ej′)​bj′​Ej′|EJ′)==∑i∈Jε−1​(φ⁡(ei′)−φ⁡(v))​(ε​bi′​Ei′|EJ′+si​∑j∈J(1−ε)​bj′​Ej′|EJ′)++∑i∈L∖Jε−1(φ(e′i)−φ(v))εb′iE′i|EJ′==∑i∈L(φ⁡(ei′)−φ⁡(v))​bi′​Ei′|EJ′+ε−1​(1−ε)​(∑i∈Jsi​(φ⁡(ei′)−φ⁡(v)))​(∑j∈Jbj′​Ej′|EJ′)=(μ∗​G−φ⁡(v)​ρ∗​𝒳0)|EJ′.\left.\rho^{*}\left(\sum_{i\in L}D_{v}\varphi(e_{i})\,b_{i}E_{i}\right)\right|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}=\sum_{i\in L}\varepsilon^{-1}\left(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v)\right)\left(\sum_{j\in L}\varphi_{i}(e^{\prime}_{j})\,b^{\prime}_{j}\,E^{\prime}_{j}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}\right)=\\ =\sum_{i\in J}\varepsilon^{-1}(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v))\left(\varepsilon\,b^{\prime}_{i}\,E^{\prime}_{i}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}+s_{i}\sum_{j\in J}(1-\varepsilon)\,b^{\prime}_{j}\,E^{\prime}_{j}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}\right)+\\ +\sum_{i\in L\setminus J}\varepsilon^{-1}(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v))\,\varepsilon\,b^{\prime}_{i}\,E^{\prime}_{i}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}=\\ =\sum_{i\in L}(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v))\,b^{\prime}_{i}\,E^{\prime}_{i}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}+\varepsilon^{-1}(1-\varepsilon)\left(\sum_{i\in J}s_{i}(\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})-\varphi(v))\right)\left(\sum_{j\in J}\,b^{\prime}_{j}\,{E^{\prime}_{j}}|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}\right)\\ =(\mu_{*}G-\varphi(v)\rho^{*}\mathcal{X}_{0})|_{E^{\prime}_{J}}.

The last equality follows from the fact that φ\varphi is affine on the simplex σJ′\sigma^{\prime}_{J} of Δ′\Delta^{\prime} so that ∑i∈Jsi​φ​(ei′)=φ⁡(v)=∑i∈Jsi​φ​(v)\sum_{i\in J}s_{i}\varphi(e^{\prime}_{i})=\varphi(v)=\sum_{i\in J}s_{i}\varphi(v). This concludes the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.