ScalingStacks

Proof. [01G1]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Step 1. For each mβ‰₯0m\geq 0 let π”žmβŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳\mathfrak{a}_{m}\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}} be the base-ideal of π’ͺ𝒳​(m​ℒ)\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(m\mathcal{L}). We are going to show that 1m​log⁑|π”žm|\tfrac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}| converges pointwise to 00 on XdivX^{\mathrm{div}}. Note that π”žm\mathfrak{a}_{m} is vertical for m≫1m\gg 1 since β„’\mathcal{L} is ample on the generic fiber of 𝒳\mathcal{X}. The sequence π”žβˆ™=(π”žm)mβ‰₯0\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}=(\mathfrak{a}_{m})_{m\geq 0} is a graded sequence of ideals, i.e. we have π”žmβ‹…π”žlβŠ‚π”žm+l\mathfrak{a}_{m}\cdot\mathfrak{a}_{l}\subset\mathfrak{a}_{m+l} for all m,lm,l. It follows that (log⁑|π”žm|)m(\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|)_{m} is a super-additive sequence, which implies that

(5.1) limmβ†’βˆž1m​log⁑|π”žm|=supm1m​log⁑|π”žm|≀0\lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|=\sup_{m}\frac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|\leq 0

pointwise on XX. Pick a rational number Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 and x∈Xdivx\in X^{\mathrm{div}}. Let ΞΈ\theta be the curvature form of hβ„’h_{\mathcal{L}}. Since 00 is by assumption a pointwise limit of ΞΈ\theta-psh model functions, there exists a vertical blow-up Ο€:𝒳′→𝒳\pi:\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} and D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)𝐐D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{Q}} such that Ο†D\varphi_{D} is ΞΈ\theta-psh, Ο†D​(x)β‰₯βˆ’Ξ΅\varphi_{D}(x)\geq-\varepsilon and Ο†D​(xEi)≀Ρ\varphi_{D}(x_{E_{i}})\leq\varepsilon for each irreducible component EiE_{i} of our given model 𝒳\mathcal{X}. By Proposition 5.9 the latter condition yields Ο†D≀Ρ\varphi_{D}\leq\varepsilon on XX, so that Dβ€²:=D+Ρ​𝒳0β€²βˆˆDiv0⁑(𝒳′)D^{\prime}:=D+\varepsilon\mathcal{X}^{\prime}_{0}\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime}) has D′≀0D^{\prime}\leq 0 and satisfies Ο†D′​(x)β‰₯βˆ’2​Ρ\varphi_{D^{\prime}}(x)\geq-2\varepsilon. On the other hand, we may assume that 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} has been chosen high enough to apply PropositionΒ 5.2 and get Dβ€²β€²βˆˆDiv0⁑(𝒳′)𝐐D^{\prime\prime}\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{Q}} with D′′≀0D^{\prime\prime}\leq 0, Ο†Dβ€²β€²β‰₯βˆ’Ξ΅\varphi_{D^{\prime\prime}}\geq-\varepsilon on XX and Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’+Dβ€²+Dβ€²β€²\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}+D^{\prime}+D^{\prime\prime} ample. Since Dβ€²+D′′≀0D^{\prime}+D^{\prime\prime}\leq 0 we then have

π’ͺ𝒳′​(m⁑(Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’+Dβ€²+Dβ€²β€²))βŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳′​(mβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹β„’).\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(m\left(\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}+D^{\prime}+D^{\prime\prime}\right))\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(m\pi^{*}\mathcal{L}).

Now the left-hand side is globally generated for some mm. Since Ο€βˆ—β€‹π’ͺ𝒳′=π’ͺ𝒳\pi_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}} we conclude that

π’ͺ𝒳′​(m⁑(Dβ€²+Dβ€²β€²))βŠ‚π’ͺπ’³β€²β‹…π”žm,\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(m(D^{\prime}+D^{\prime\prime}))\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}\cdot\mathfrak{a}_{m},

hence

βˆ’3​Ρ≀φDβ€²+D′′​(x)≀1m​log⁑|π”žm|​(x).-3\varepsilon\leq\varphi_{D^{\prime}+D^{\prime\prime}}(x)\leq\frac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|(x).

We have thus shown that supm1m​log⁑|π”žm|β‰₯0\sup_{m}\tfrac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}|\geq 0 at each x∈Xdivx\in X^{\mathrm{div}}, which implies as desired that 1m​log⁑|π”žm|\tfrac{1}{m}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{m}| converges to 00 pointwise on XdivX^{\mathrm{div}} thanks to (5.1).

Step 2. Let us now show that β„’\mathcal{L} is nef. For each c>0c>0 let π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™c)βŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{c})\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}} be the multiplier ideal attached to the graded sequence π”žβˆ™\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet} (cf.Β Appendix B). We have the elementary inclusion π”žmβŠ‚π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m)\mathfrak{a}_{m}\subset\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m}) for all m∈𝐍m\in\mathbf{N}, whereas the subadditivity property (cf.Β TheoremΒ B.7) implies π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m​l)βŠ‚π’₯​(π”žβˆ™m)l\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{ml})\subset\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})^{l} for all l,m∈𝐍l,m\in\mathbf{N}. We infer that π”žm​lβŠ‚π’₯​(π”žβˆ™m)l\mathfrak{a}_{ml}\subset\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})^{l} for any m,lm,l and hence

supl1l​log⁑|π”žm​l|≀log⁑|π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m)|≀0.\sup_{l}\tfrac{1}{l}\log|\mathfrak{a}_{ml}|\leq\log|\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})|\leq 0.

By Step 2 we conclude that log⁑|π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m)|=0\log|\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})|=0, i.e. π’₯⁑(π”žβˆ™m)=π’ͺ𝒳\mathcal{J}(\mathfrak{a}_{\bullet}^{m})=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}} since multiplier ideals are integrally closed by definition. The uniform global generation property of multiplier ideals (Theorem B.8) now yields an ample line bundle π’œβˆˆPic⁑(𝒳)\mathcal{A}\in\Pic(\mathcal{X}) independent of mm such that m​ℒ+π’œm\mathcal{L}+\mathcal{A} is globally generated for all m∈𝐍m\in\mathbf{N}. This immediately shows that β„’\mathcal{L} is nef. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.