ScalingStacks

Proof. [01EW]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Upon multiplying by Ο–m\varpi^{m} with m≫1m\gg 1, we may assume that π”žβŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳\mathfrak{a}\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}} is a vertical ideal sheaf. Pick JβŠ‚IJ\subset I such that EJE_{J} is non-empty, choose a point ξ∈EJ\xi\in E_{J} and let f1,…,fmf_{1},\dots,f_{m} be generators of π”ž\mathfrak{a} at ΞΎ\xi. With the notation introduced in the proof of Theorem 3.1 we then have

(3.5) log|π”ž|(emb𝒳⁑(s))=max⁑{βˆ’val𝒳,s⁑(fi),i=1,…,m}.\log|\mathfrak{a}|(\emb_{\mathcal{X}}(s))=\max\left\{-\val_{\mathcal{X},s}(f_{i}),\,i=1,\dots,m\right\}.

By (3.4) each function sβ†¦βˆ’val𝒳,s⁑(fi)s\mapsto-\val_{\mathcal{X},s}(f_{i}) is piecewise affine and convex on ΟƒJ\sigma_{J}, provingΒ (i). To proveΒ (ii), pick any x∈Xx\in X, set ΞΎ:=c𝒳​(x)\xi:=c_{\mathcal{X}}(x) and let JβŠ‚IJ\subset I be the set of indices j∈Ij\in I such that ξ∈Ej\xi\in E_{j}. Arguing similarly with generators of π”ž\mathfrak{a}, it is enough to show that |f⁑(x)|≀|f⁑(p𝒳​(x))||f(x)|\leq|f(p_{\mathcal{X}}(x))| for each f∈π’ͺ𝒳,ΞΎf\in\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X},\xi}. Note that the seminorm f↦|f⁑(x)|f\mapsto|f(x)| extends by continuity to π’ͺ^𝒳,ΞΎ\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X},\xi} since ΞΎ=c𝒳​(x)\xi=c_{\mathcal{X}}(x). Writing in the notation of Remark 3.8 f=βˆ‘Ξ±βˆˆπLfα​zα∈π’ͺ^𝒳,ΞΎf=\sum_{\alpha\in\mathbf{N}^{L}}f_{\alpha}z^{\alpha}\in\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X},\xi} we then have

|f⁑(x)|≀supfΞ±β‰ 0∏j∈J|zj​(x)|Ξ±j|f(x)|\leq\sup_{f_{\alpha}\neq 0}\prod_{j\in J}|z_{j}(x)|^{\alpha_{j}}

by the ultrametric property, using that |fα​(x)|=1|f_{\alpha}(x)|=1 since each non-zero fα∈π’ͺ𝒳,ΞΎf_{\alpha}\in\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X},\xi} is a unit. On the other hand, if we set sj:=βˆ’log⁑|zj​(x)|s_{j}:=-\log|z_{j}(x)| for j∈Jj\in J then we have by definition p𝒳​(x)=emb𝒳⁑(s)p_{\mathcal{X}}(x)=\emb_{\mathcal{X}}(s), hence

supfΞ±β‰ 0∏j∈J|zj​(x)|Ξ±j=|f⁑(p𝒳​(x))|\sup_{f_{\alpha}\neq 0}\prod_{j\in J}|z_{j}(x)|^{\alpha_{j}}=|f(p_{\mathcal{X}}(x))|

and the result follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.