2. Projective Berkovich spaces and model functions [01E1]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
2. Projective Berkovich spaces and model functions
2.1. Analytifications
Let be a proper -variety. Its generic fiber is in particular a proper -scheme. As a topological space, its -analytification in the sense of Berkovich is compact and can be described as follows (cf.Β [Ber90, Theorem 3.4.1]). Choose a finite cover of by Zariski open subsets of the form where is a -algebra of finite type. The Berkovich space is defined as the set of all multiplicative seminorms extending the given absolute value of , endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence. It is common usage to write . The space is then obtained by gluing together the open sets . There is a canonical continuous map , locally defined on by setting
The seminorm defines a norm on the residue field , extending the given absolute value on . The completion of with respect to this norm is denoted . It is the residue field at of the natural structure sheaf of , that we will however not explicitely use.
Given denote by the corresponding valuation ring in . By the valuative criterion of properness, the map admits a unique lift mapping the generic point to . In line with valuative terminologyΒ [Va00], we call the image of the closed point of in the center of on and denote it by . It is a specialization of in . It also belongs to since it maps to the closed point of by construction. The map so defined is anti-continuous. It is referred to as the reduction map in rigid geometry.
2.2. Models
From now on we let be a given smooth connected projective -analytic space in the sense of Berkovich. By a model of we will mean a normal and projective -variety together with the data of an isomorphism . The set of models of is non-empty thanks to the non-Archimedean GAGA principle. Given in we write if there exists a vertical blow-up . This turns (modulo isomorphism) into a directed set.
For any model of and any irreducible component of the there exists a unique point whose center of is the generic point of . Such points will be called divisorial points.11 1 Divisorial points are called Shilov boundaries inΒ [YZ09]. The set of divisorial points is dense in , see CorollaryΒ 2.4 and alsoΒ [Poi11].
2.3. Model functions
Let be a model of . Each vertical fractional ideal sheaf on defines a continuous function by setting
| (2.1) |
In particular, each vertical Cartier divisor defines a vertical fractional ideal sheaf , hence a continuous function
Note that is the constant function since . Since models are assumed to be normal, a vertical divisor is uniquely determined by the values at divisorial points , and we have in particular iff is effective. The map extends by linearity to .
Following [Yua08] we introduce the following terminology.
Definition 2.1.
We shall also occasionally consider the similarly defined spaces and .
As a matter of terminology, we say that a model is a determination of a model function if for some . By the above remarks we have a natural isomorphism
The next result summarizes the key properties of model functions. Since our setting does not require any machinery from rigid geometry we provide direct arguments for the convenience of the reader.
Proposition 2.2.
For each model , the subgroup of spanned with ranging over all vertical (fractional) ideal sheaves of coincides with . It is furthermore stable under max and separates points of .
Proof.
If is a vertical fractional ideal sheaf on a given model then is a vertical ideal sheaf for some and we have , so it is enough to consider vertical ideal sheaves.
Observe first that belongs to . Indeed if denotes the normalization of the blow-up of along , then the Cartier divisor on such that satisfies . Conversely, let , and let us show that can be written as
with vertical ideal sheaves on . By definition is determined by for some vertical blow-up . By LemmaΒ 1.4 we may choose a -ample vertical Cartier divisor . Both sheaves and are then -globally generated for . If we introduce the vertical fractional ideal sheaves and then the -global generation property yields and . It follows that and , and hence . It remains to replace and with and with , so that they become actual ideal sheaves.
We next prove that is stable under max. Given choose a model on which both functions are determined, by respectively. We then have
with , which shows that .
In order to get the separation property, we basically argue as in [Gub98, Corollary 7.7], which relied on [BL93, Lemma 2.6]. Let be a fixed model and pick two distinct points . If is distinct from then already separates and . Otherwise, let be an open neighborhood of in . By definition of there exists such that . Since the scheme is Noetherian, extends to a coherent ideal sheaf on . For each positive integer the ideal sheaf is vertical on , and we have
at and , so we see that separates and for . β
Thanks to the βBoolean ring versionβ of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, we get as a consequence the following crucial result, which is equivalent toΒ [Gub98, Theorem 7.12] (compareΒ [Yua08, Lemma 3.5] and the remark following it).
Corollary 2.3.
The -vector space stable under max and separates points. As a consequence, it is dense in for the topology of uniform convergence.
CorollaryΒ 2.3 in turn implies the following result, which corresponds toΒ [YZ09, LemmaΒ 2.4]. We reproduce the short proof for completeness.
Corollary 2.4.
The set of divisorial points is dense in .
Proof.
Pick vanishing on and rational. By CorollaryΒ 2.3 there exists a model and a divisor such that on . The divisor is then effective, proving and hence on . β
The collection of finite dimensional spaces endowed with the transpose of pull-back morphisms on divisors and the topology of the pointwise convergence forms an inductive system, and we have:
Corollary 2.5.
For each model , let be the evaluation map defined by . Then the induced map
is a homeomorphism onto its image.
The image of this map will be described in CorollaryΒ 3.2.
Proof.
The map in question is continuous since any model function is continuous. It is injective by CorollaryΒ 2.3. Since is compact, we conclude that it is a homeomorphism onto its image. β