ScalingStacks

Proof. [01E0]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

As a first step, we reduce the assertion to the case where D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)𝐐D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{Q}} is Ο€\pi-ample. Indeed, the set of vertical Ο€\pi-ample 𝐑\mathbf{R}-divisors, which is an open convex cone in Div0⁑(𝒳′)𝐑\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{R}}, is non-empty by (i) of Lemma 1.4. We may thus choose a basis A1,…,ArA_{1},...,A_{r} of Div0⁑(𝒳′)𝐑\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{R}} made up of Ο€\pi-ample Cartier divisors. Let Ξ΅=(Ξ΅i)βˆˆπ‘+r\varepsilon=(\varepsilon_{i})\in\mathbf{R}_{+}^{r} be such that DΞ΅:=D+βˆ‘iΞ΅i​AiD_{\varepsilon}:=D+\sum_{i}\varepsilon_{i}A_{i} is a 𝐐\mathbf{Q}-divisor. The fact that DD is Ο€\pi-nef means that Dβ‹…Cβ‰₯0D\cdot C\geq 0 for each curve CC contained in a fiber of Ο€\pi. Since each AiA_{i} is Ο€\pi-ample, it follows from Kleiman’s criterion [Kle66] that DΞ΅D_{\varepsilon} is Ο€\pi-ample on the projective kk-scheme 𝒳0β€²\mathcal{X}_{0}^{\prime}, hence DΞ΅D_{\varepsilon} is also Ο€\pi-ample on 𝒳′\mathcal{X}^{\prime} by [EGA, III.4.7.1]. Upon replacing DD with DΞ΅D_{\varepsilon} for Ξ΅\varepsilon arbitrarily small we may thus assume as desired that D∈Div0⁑(𝒳′)𝐐D\in\Div_{0}(\mathcal{X}^{\prime})_{\mathbf{Q}} is Ο€\pi-ample.

Now choose m≫1m\gg 1 such that π’ͺ𝒳′​(m​D)\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(mD) is Ο€\pi-globally generated, which means that the vertical fractional ideal sheaf π”ž:=Ο€βˆ—β€‹π’ͺ𝒳′​(m​D)\mathfrak{a}:=\pi_{*}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(mD) satisfies π”žβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳′=π’ͺ𝒳′​(m​D)\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(mD). It is obvious that π”žβŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳​(mβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹D)\mathfrak{a}\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(m\pi_{*}D), hence π’ͺ𝒳′​(m​D)βŠ‚π’ͺ𝒳′​(mβ€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹Ο€βˆ—β€‹D)\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(mD)\subset\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}^{\prime}}(m\pi^{*}\pi_{*}D), and the result follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.