ScalingStacks

Proof. [04LV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The proof follows the same lines of Lemma 7.6. Assume that ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta} has been constructed with Theorem 6.19. In particular the wall Γ\Gamma consists of the union of three disjoint sets, denoted Γc\Gamma_{c}, Γd\Gamma_{d} and Γe\Gamma_{e}. The corresponding components of the seam are Zc=f−1​(Γc)Z_{c}=f^{-1}(\Gamma_{c}), Zd=f−1​(Γc)Z_{d}=f^{-1}(\Gamma_{c}) and Ze=f−1​(Γe)Z_{e}=f^{-1}(\Gamma_{e}) with corresponding quotients denoted by Z¯c\bar{Z}_{c}, Z¯d\bar{Z}_{d} and Z¯e\bar{Z}_{e}. The invariants of ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta} are given by sequences ℓc\ell^{c}, ℓd\ell^{d} and ℓe\ell^{e}. In particular the first order invariants satisfy the integral conditions (60) with m1=−1m_{1}=-1 and m2=1m_{2}=1.

Over the same wall Γ\Gamma and seam ZZ, we could define another triple of invariants as follows. Define (ℓc)′(\ell^{c})^{\prime} to be the zero sequence, while (ℓd)′(\ell^{d})^{\prime} and (ℓe)′(\ell^{e})^{\prime} to be sequences whose only non-zero terms are the first order ones, which we define to be

(ℓ1d)′=−d​y2and(ℓ1e)′=d​y3.(\ell_{1}^{d})^{\prime}=-dy_{2}\ \ \text{and}\ \ (\ell_{1}^{e})^{\prime}=dy_{3}.

As we saw in Example 6.21, these choices of invariants give rise to a fake stitched fibration ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} which is topologically conjugate to ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta}.

Using Theorem 6.19 we now construct a new stitched fibration with the same wall Γ\Gamma and seam ZZ as ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta}, but whose invariants interpolate between those of ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} and those of ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta}. Let A′A^{\prime} be a small tubular neighborhood of Δ\Delta and denote A¯′=A′∩{b1=0}\bar{A}^{\prime}=A^{\prime}\cap\{b_{1}=0\}. Assume that A¯′\bar{A}^{\prime} is entirely contained in the region in Figure 15 (a) delimited by the dotted lines. In particular we want the ends of A¯′\bar{A}^{\prime} to be contained in the white region where ℱ\mathcal{F} is smooth. Let A⊂A′A\subset A^{\prime} be a smaller open neighborhood of Δ\Delta and denote A¯=A∩{b1=0}\bar{A}=A\cap\{b_{1}=0\}. Let ρ∈C∞​(Γ)\rho\in C^{\infty}(\Gamma) be a cut-off function which is 1 on A¯\bar{A} and 00 on Γ−A¯′\Gamma-\bar{A}^{\prime}. Define ℓ~kc=(1−ρ)​(ℓkc)′+ρ​ℓkc\tilde{\ell}_{k}^{c}=(1-\rho)(\ell_{k}^{c})^{\prime}+\rho\,\ell_{k}^{c} and similarly define ℓ~kd\tilde{\ell}_{k}^{d} and ℓ~ke\tilde{\ell}_{k}^{e}. It follows from Theorem 6.19 that the sequences ℓ~c\tilde{\ell}_{c}, ℓ~d\tilde{\ell}_{d} and ℓ~e\tilde{\ell}_{e} give rise to a stitched Lagrangian fibration ℱ~o\tilde{\mathcal{F}}^{o} which is topologically conjugate to ℱ|ℝ3−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{\mathbb{R}^{3}-\Delta}. Moreover ℱ~o|A−Δ\tilde{\mathcal{F}}^{o}|_{A-\Delta} and ℱ|A−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{A-\Delta} are symplectically conjugate so we can glue ℱ|A\mathcal{F}|_{A} to ℱ~o|A−Δ\tilde{\mathcal{F}}^{o}|_{A-\Delta} along ℱ|A−Δ\mathcal{F}|_{A-\Delta}. This produces a piecewise smooth Lagrangian fibration ℱ~\tilde{\mathcal{F}} which is topologically conjugate to ℱ\mathcal{F}, moreover the chosen invariants guarantee that after a change of coordinates on the base ℱ~\tilde{\mathcal{F}} satisfies the smoothness condition (i​i)(ii). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.