ScalingStacks

Proof. [04KH]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We refer the reader to [2]Theorem 6.12 for the details. Roughly, one starts with U+U^{+} and U−U^{-} regarded as disjoint sets. These give two disjoint pieces X±=T∗​U±/Λ±X^{\pm}=T^{\ast}U^{\pm}/\penalty\Lambda^{\pm}, where Λ±=⟨d​b1,…,d​bn⟩ℤ\Lambda^{\pm}=\langle db_{1},\ldots,db_{n}\rangle_{\mathbb{Z}}. Let Z±=∂X±Z^{\pm}=\partial X^{\pm}. On X+X^{+} we have Hamiltonian vector fields η1=∂b1\eta_{1}=\partial_{b_{1}} and η+j=∂bj\eta^{+}_{j}=\partial_{b_{j}} for j=2,…,nj=2,\ldots,n. We can also define vector fields on Z+Z^{+}:

ηj−=ηj+−aj​η1\eta^{-}_{j}=\eta^{+}_{j}-a_{j}\eta_{1}

where (a2,…,an)(a_{2},\ldots,a_{n}) are the coefficients of ℓ1\ell_{1}. One can (topologically) glue X+X^{+} and X−X^{-} using a map Q:Z−→Z+Q:Z^{-}\rightarrow Z^{+} defined in terms of the ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n} action induced by the flows of ηj−\eta_{j}^{-}. Intuitively, QQ identifies the fibres inside each of the two halves Z−Z^{-} and Z+Z^{+} after the fibres inside Z−Z^{-} have been twisted by iteratively flowing in the direction of η1,η2−,…,ηn−\eta_{1},\eta^{-}_{2},\ldots,\eta^{-}_{n}. The integrality condition (56) guarantees that (ii) is satisfied. One can extend QQ to give a smooth symplectomorphism Q~\tilde{Q} between open neighborhoods of Z±Z^{\pm}. For this one needs to consider invariants ℓk\ell_{k}, for k>1k>1. The choice of Q~\tilde{Q} is determined by {ℓk}\{\ell_{k}\}. This gluing gives a smooth symplectic manifold (X,ω)(X,\omega) and a stitched fibration f:X→Uf:X\rightarrow U, which by construction is such that inv⁡(ℱ)=(Z¯nor,ℓ)\inv(\mathcal{F})=(\bar{Z}_{\text{nor}},\ell). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.