ScalingStacks

3.3 Model functions, metrics, positivity [00B7]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

3.3 Model functions, metrics, positivity

We now discuss functions, line bundles, and metrics on XKa​nX_{K}^{an} [2]. Given a model 𝒳\mathcal{X} over Spec​(R)\text{Spec}(R) and a Cartier divisor DD supported on the central fibre 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}, we can associate a continuous function on XKa​nX_{K}^{an} by setting

Ο•D​(x)=max⁑{log⁑|f|x:f∈π’ͺ𝒳​(D)},\phi_{D}(x)=\max\{\log|f|_{x}:f\in\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(D)\},

The association D↦ϕDD\mapsto\phi_{D} extends by β„š\mathbb{Q}-linearity. Functions obtained in the β„š\mathbb{Q}-span using all such choices of models and divisors are called model functions on XKa​nX_{K}^{an}, which form a dense subset of C0​(XKa​n)C^{0}(X_{K}^{an}). The restrictions of such functions to dual intersection complexes are piecewise affine.

To understand the complex geometric meaning, we think of models base changed from snc models over SS. The divisor DD prescribes a class of functions Ο•\phi on the total space of the snc model with analytic singularities:

Ο•=log⁑|f|+Cβˆžβ€‹Β function,\phi=\log|f|+C^{\infty}\text{ function},

where ff is a local defining function of DD. When we consider the rescaling of the restrictions to XtX_{t}

Ο•t=1log⁑|t|​ϕ|Xt,\phi_{t}=\frac{1}{\log|t|}\phi|_{X_{t}},

only the singular term is relevant in the limit tβ†’0t\to 0, and Ο•t\phi_{t} converge to βˆ’Ο•D-\phi_{D} in the hybrid topology.

We think about line bundles on XKa​nX_{K}^{an} via the GAGA principle: the line bundles on XKa​nX_{K}^{an} correspond to the line bundles LL on the scheme XKX_{K}. A continuous metric on LL assigns to each local section ss a nonnegative continuous local function β€–sβ€–\left\lVert s\right\rVert on open subsets of XKa​nX_{K}^{an}, compatible with the sheaf structure, such that β€–f​s‖​(x)=|f|x​‖s‖​(x)\left\lVert fs\right\rVert(x)=|f|_{x}\left\lVert s\right\rVert(x), and β€–sβ€–>0\left\lVert s\right\rVert>0 if ss is a local frame of LL. Given a continuous metric, any other continuous metric on LL is of the form ‖⋅‖​eβˆ’Ο•\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert e^{-\phi} for some Ο•βˆˆC0​(Xa​n)\phi\in C^{0}(X^{an}), analogous to the usual relation between Hermitian metrics and KΓ€hler potentials. As such Ο•\phi is referred to as a potential function.

Given a model 𝒳\mathcal{X} for XKX_{K}, a model β„’\mathcal{L} of LL is a line bundle ℒ→𝒳\mathcal{L}\to\mathcal{X} with β„’|X=L\mathcal{L}|_{X}=L. To this data we can associate a unique metric β€–β‹…β€–β„’\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{\mathcal{L}} on LL with the following property: if ss is a nowhere vanishing local section of β„’\mathcal{L} on an open set π’°βŠ‚π’³\mathcal{U}\subset\mathcal{X}, then β€–s‖ℒ≑1\left\lVert s\right\rVert_{\mathcal{L}}\equiv 1 on π’°βˆ©XK\mathcal{U}\cap X_{K}. This is well defined because any two such sections differ by the multiplication of an invertible function, whose NA absolute value equals the constant one. One can extend this construction to β„š\mathbb{Q}-line bundles, and the metrics arising this way are called model metrics. They are dense within the continuous metrics.

To see the complex geometric interpretation, we imagine a line bundle β„’\mathcal{L} on some snc models 𝒳\mathcal{X} over an algebraic curve. Equip β„’\mathcal{L} with any smooth Hermitian metric hh. Given a local section ss of β„’\mathcal{L}, the prescription compatible with (6) is to consider the local functions on XtX_{t}

z↦|s⁑(z)|h1/|log⁑|t||.z\mapsto|s(z)|_{h}^{1/|\log|t||}.

Taking the limit as t→0t\to 0, we precisely get the model metric. Notice the ambiguity in the choice of the Hermitian metric is obliterated in the limit.

A paramount notion in KÀhler geometry is the positivity of the metric, usually phrased in terms of psh properties of the potential. The above discussion suggests that in the NA setting, namely t→0t\to 0, such a notion should be expressible as a numerical property of the line bundle.

Definition 3.2.

[4, Thm. 2.17] (Semipositivity I) Let β€–β‹…β€–\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert be a model metric on LL, associated to a β„š\mathbb{Q}-line bundle β„’\mathcal{L} on a model 𝒳\mathcal{X} of XKX_{K}. Then

  • β€’

    the metric β€–β€–\left\lVert\right\rVert is a semipositive model metric iff β„’\mathcal{L} is nef, namely β„’β‹…Cβ‰₯0\mathcal{L}\cdot C\geq 0 for any projective curve CC contained in 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0};

  • β€’

    a continuous metric ‖‖​eβˆ’Ο•\left\lVert\right\rVert e^{-\phi} is semipositive iff it is the uniform limit of some sequence of semipositive model metrics on XKa​nX_{K}^{an}.

Remark 3.3.

The advantage of β€˜nef’ instead of β€˜ample’ is that if we blow up the model further, the pullback of the model line bundle will stay nef, but ampleness will be lost.

Remark 3.4.

Given a continuous metric β€–β‹…β€–\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert, one can assign to it a β€˜closed (1,1)-form’ ΞΈ\theta, which for model metrics roughly amounts to taking the numerical class of the model line bundle. This is a formal analogue for the curvature form of a Hermitian metric. For instance, ‖⋅‖​eβˆ’Ο•\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert e^{-\phi} is a continuous semipositive metric iff the potential Ο•\phi is a continuous ΞΈ\theta-psh function. Another theory of forms and currents on Berkovich spaces is developed by Chambert-Loir and Ducros [12], which is closer in spirit to differential calculus.

In KΓ€hler geometry the definition of psh function is local in the complex charts. Since the dual intersection complexes are simplicial objects, one would expect the NA analogous notion to be related to convex functions. This intuition is partially valid:

Proposition 3.5.

[2, Prop 5.9] Let 𝒳\mathcal{X} be an snc model for XKX_{K}, and ℒ→𝒳\mathcal{L}\to\mathcal{X} be a model line bundle for Lβ†’XL\to X, with associated closed (1,1)-form ΞΈ\theta. Then the restriction of any continuous ΞΈ\theta-psh function to any face of Ξ”π’³βŠ‚XKa​n\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}\subset X_{K}^{an} is convex.

The picture is that general ΞΈ\theta-psh functions define convex functions on the faces of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}, and among them the ΞΈ\theta-psh model functions give piecewise affine approximations with finer and finer grids.

Remark 3.6.

Gubler and Martin [22, section 3] argue that the a priori global notion of semipositivity can be localized on the Berkovich space, but their notion is quite abstract. It would be attractive to formulate a notion of convexity for functions on Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} that precisely characterize the restrictions of continuous ΞΈ\theta-psh functions from XKa​nX_{K}^{an} to Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. Compare also [12, Chapter 5] for another strategy to define plurisubharmonicity on the Berkovich space in terms of positivity of currents.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.