3.3 Model functions, metrics, positivity [00B7]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
3.3 Model functions, metrics, positivity
We now discuss functions, line bundles, and metrics on [2]. Given a model over and a Cartier divisor supported on the central fibre , we can associate a continuous function on by setting
The association extends by -linearity. Functions obtained in the -span using all such choices of models and divisors are called model functions on , which form a dense subset of . The restrictions of such functions to dual intersection complexes are piecewise affine.
To understand the complex geometric meaning, we think of models base changed from snc models over . The divisor prescribes a class of functions on the total space of the snc model with analytic singularities:
where is a local defining function of . When we consider the rescaling of the restrictions to
only the singular term is relevant in the limit , and converge to in the hybrid topology.
We think about line bundles on via the GAGA principle: the line bundles on correspond to the line bundles on the scheme . A continuous metric on assigns to each local section a nonnegative continuous local function on open subsets of , compatible with the sheaf structure, such that , and if is a local frame of . Given a continuous metric, any other continuous metric on is of the form for some , analogous to the usual relation between Hermitian metrics and KΓ€hler potentials. As such is referred to as a potential function.
Given a model for , a model of is a line bundle with . To this data we can associate a unique metric on with the following property: if is a nowhere vanishing local section of on an open set , then on . This is well defined because any two such sections differ by the multiplication of an invertible function, whose NA absolute value equals the constant one. One can extend this construction to -line bundles, and the metrics arising this way are called model metrics. They are dense within the continuous metrics.
To see the complex geometric interpretation, we imagine a line bundle on some snc models over an algebraic curve. Equip with any smooth Hermitian metric . Given a local section of , the prescription compatible with (6) is to consider the local functions on
Taking the limit as , we precisely get the model metric. Notice the ambiguity in the choice of the Hermitian metric is obliterated in the limit.
A paramount notion in KΓ€hler geometry is the positivity of the metric, usually phrased in terms of psh properties of the potential. The above discussion suggests that in the NA setting, namely , such a notion should be expressible as a numerical property of the line bundle.
Definition 3.2.
[4, Thm. 2.17] (Semipositivity I) Let be a model metric on , associated to a -line bundle on a model of . Then
- β’
the metric is a semipositive model metric iff is nef, namely for any projective curve contained in ;
- β’
a continuous metric is semipositive iff it is the uniform limit of some sequence of semipositive model metrics on .
Remark 3.3.
The advantage of βnefβ instead of βampleβ is that if we blow up the model further, the pullback of the model line bundle will stay nef, but ampleness will be lost.
Remark 3.4.
Given a continuous metric , one can assign to it a βclosed (1,1)-formβ , which for model metrics roughly amounts to taking the numerical class of the model line bundle. This is a formal analogue for the curvature form of a Hermitian metric. For instance, is a continuous semipositive metric iff the potential is a continuous -psh function. Another theory of forms and currents on Berkovich spaces is developed by Chambert-Loir and Ducros [12], which is closer in spirit to differential calculus.
In KΓ€hler geometry the definition of psh function is local in the complex charts. Since the dual intersection complexes are simplicial objects, one would expect the NA analogous notion to be related to convex functions. This intuition is partially valid:
Proposition 3.5.
[2, Prop 5.9] Let be an snc model for , and be a model line bundle for , with associated closed (1,1)-form . Then the restriction of any continuous -psh function to any face of is convex.
The picture is that general -psh functions define convex functions on the faces of , and among them the -psh model functions give piecewise affine approximations with finer and finer grids.
Remark 3.6.
Gubler and Martin [22, section 3] argue that the a priori global notion of semipositivity can be localized on the Berkovich space, but their notion is quite abstract. It would be attractive to formulate a notion of convexity for functions on that precisely characterize the restrictions of continuous -psh functions from to . Compare also [12, Chapter 5] for another strategy to define plurisubharmonicity on the Berkovich space in terms of positivity of currents.