ScalingStacks

2 Analytic backgrounds [00AY]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2 Analytic backgrounds

2.1 Uniform Skoda inequality

Given a Kähler manifold (Y,ω)(Y,\omega), an upper semicontinuous Ll​o​c1L^{1}_{loc} function ϕ∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)\phi\in PSH(Y,\omega), if ωϕ=ω+d​dc​ϕ≥0\omega_{\phi}=\omega+dd^{c}\phi\geq 0. A Skoda type inequality captures the apriori regularity of such functions. The following uniform version is the main result in the author’s companion paper [33].

Theorem 2.1.

(Uniform Skoda estimate) Given a polarised algebraic degeneration family of Calabi-Yau manifolds π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} as in the Introduction. Let ωF​S\omega_{FS} be a fixed Fubini-Study metric on (X,c1​(L))(X,c_{1}(L)) induced by a projective embedding via the sections of a high power of LL, and use ωF​S,t=1|log⁡|t||​ωF​S|Xt\omega_{FS,t}=\frac{1}{|\log|t||}\omega_{FS}|_{X_{t}} to define a family of background metrics on XtX_{t} in the class 1|log⁡|t||​c1​(L)\frac{1}{|\log|t||}c_{1}(L). Then there are uniform positive constants α,A\alpha,A independent of tt for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, such that for the normalised Calabi-Yau measures d​μtd\mu_{t},

∫Xte−α​u​d​μt≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωF​S,t)​ with ​supXtu=0.\int_{X_{t}}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu_{t}\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{FS,t})\text{ with }\sup_{X_{t}}u=0.

2.2 Kolodziej’s estimate on pluripotentials

Given an nn-dimensional Kähler manifold (Y,ω)(Y,\omega), for ϕ∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)∩L∞\phi\in PSH(Y,\omega)\cap L^{\infty}, pluripotential theory allows one to make sense of the Monge-Ampère (MA) measure ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}, generalising the notion of volume forms. A basic problem is to estimate ϕ\phi from a priori bounds on ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}. A prototypical result is (cf. [32, section 2.2] for an exposition based on [15][16]):

Theorem 2.2.

Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and ϕ∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)∩C0\phi\in PSH(Y,\omega)\cap C^{0}, such that ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n} is an absolutely continuous measure. Assume there are positive constants α,A\alpha,A, such that the Skoda type estimate holds with respect to ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}:

∫Ye−α​u​ωϕnVol​(Y)≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)​ with ​supYu=0.\int_{Y}e^{-\alpha u}\frac{\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(Y,\omega)\text{ with }\sup_{Y}u=0. (3)
  • •

    For fixed n,α,An,\alpha,A, there is number B⁡(n,α,A)B(n,\alpha,A), such that if ∫ϕ≤−t0ωϕnVol​(Y)<(2​B)−2​n\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}<(2B)^{-2n} for some t0t_{0}, then min⁡ϕ≥−t0−4​B​(∫ϕ≤−t0ωϕnVol​(Y))1/2​n\min\phi\geq-t_{0}-4B(\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)})^{1/2n}.

  • •

    If supYϕ=0\sup_{Y}\phi=0, then ‖ϕ‖C0≤C⁡(n,α,A)\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq C(n,\alpha,A).

The strength of this result is that it still applies when the complex/Kähler structures are highly degenerate, as it distills the dependence on (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) to only 3 constants n,α,An,\alpha,A. A minor variant gives a criterion for two Kähler potentials to be close to each other.

Corollary 2.3.

(Stability estimate) Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and ϕ,ψ∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)∩C0\phi,\psi\in PSH(Y,\omega)\cap C^{0}, such that ωψn\omega_{\psi}^{n} is absolutely continuous. Assume ‖ϕ‖C0≤A′\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq A^{\prime} and the Skoda type estimate (3). Then there is a number B⁡(n,A,A′,α)B(n,A,A^{\prime},\alpha), such that if ∫ψ−ϕ≤−t0ωψnVol​(Y)<(2​B)−2​n\frac{\int_{\psi-\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\psi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}<(2B)^{-2n} for some t0t_{0}, then

min⁡(ψ−ϕ)≥−t0−4​B​(∫ψ−ϕ≤−t0ωψnVol​(Y))1/2​n.\min(\psi-\phi)\geq-t_{0}-4B\left(\frac{\int_{\psi-\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\psi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}\right)^{1/2n}.

.

2.3 L1L^{1}-stability estimate

In complex pluripotential theory, an L1L^{1}-stability estimate is an assertion about the C0C^{0}-closeness of two Kähler potentials given that their volume densities are close in L1L^{1}. We now adapt an argument of Kolodziej [30] to prove a uniform version which allows the complex structure to be highly degenerate and the volume to collapse. Our formulation also brings out the asymmetrical role of the two Kähler potentials; in fact one of them is set to zero. We do not pursue optimality.

Lemma 2.4.

(Comparison principle)[30, Thm. 2.1] If uu and vv are ω\omega-psh on YY, then on Ω={u<v}\Omega=\{u<v\}, we have

∫Ωωun≥∫Ωωvn.\int_{\Omega}\omega_{u}^{n}\geq\int_{\Omega}\omega_{v}^{n}.
Lemma 2.5.

(Concavity of d​e​t1/ndet^{1/n}) On an open domain, suppose u,vu,v are continuous ω\omega-psh functions, with

ωun=f​ωn,ωvn=g​ωn\omega_{u}^{n}=f\omega^{n},\quad\omega_{v}^{n}=g\omega^{n}

for f,g∈L∞f,g\in L^{\infty}. Then for 0<s<10<s<1, we have ωs​u+(1−s)​vn≥(s​f1/n+(1−s)​g1/n)n​ωn\omega_{su+(1-s)v}^{n}\geq(sf^{1/n}+(1-s)g^{1/n})^{n}\omega^{n}.

Proof.

In the smooth case this is a pointwise inequality expressing the concavity of A↦det1/nAA\mapsto\det^{1/n}A on the set of Hermitian matrices. In general one shows this by an approximation argument [30, Lemma 1.2]. ∎

Theorem 2.6.

(Uniform L1L^{1}-stability) Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and ϕ∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)∩C0\phi\in PSH(Y,\omega)\cap C^{0}, satisfying the complex MA equations

ωnVol​(Y)=d​μ,ωϕnVol​(Y)=d​ν\frac{\omega^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}=d\mu,\quad\frac{\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}=d\nu

for probability measures d​μd\mu and d​νd\nu. Assume

  • •

    There is a Skoda estimate

    ∫Ye−α​u​𝑑μ≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)​ with ​supYu=0.\int_{Y}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(Y,\omega)\text{ with }\sup_{Y}u=0.
  • •

    The complement of E0={ϕ>0}E_{0}=\{\phi>0\} has a mass lower bound

    ∫E0c𝑑μ≥λ>0.\int_{E_{0}^{c}}d\mu\geq\lambda>0.
  • •

    (L1L^{1}-stability assumption) The total variation ∫Y|𝑑μ−𝑑ν|≤s2​n+3<1\int_{Y}|d\mu-d\nu|\leq s^{2n+3}<1.

  • •

    ϕ\phi is smooth away from a (possibly empty) closed subset SS with d​μd\mu-measure zero. Globally ‖ϕ‖C0≤A′\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq A^{\prime}.

Then for 0<s<s0​(λ,n,α,A,A′)≪10<s<s_{0}(\lambda,n,\alpha,A,A^{\prime})\ll 1, there is a uniform estimate

supYϕ≤C⁡(λ,n,α,A,A′)​s.\sup_{Y}\phi\leq C(\lambda,n,\alpha,A,A^{\prime})s.
Proof.

We can reduce to the case with d​μ​(E0)≥12d\mu(E_{0})\geq\frac{1}{2} by shifting ϕ\phi by a constant. We construct an auxiliary continuous ω\omega-psh function ρ\rho by solving the complex MA equation with L∞L^{\infty}-density [15]

ωρnVol​(Y)=1d​μ​(E0)​d​μ  E0,supYρ=0.\frac{\omega_{\rho}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}=\frac{1}{d\mu(E_{0})}d\mu\mathbin{\vrule height=6.88889pt,depth=0.0pt,width=0.55974pt\vrule height=0.55974pt,depth=0.0pt,width=5.59721pt}E_{0},\quad\sup_{Y}\rho=0.

where d​μ  E0​(F)=d​μ​(E∩F)d\mu\mathbin{\vrule height=6.88889pt,depth=0.0pt,width=0.55974pt\vrule height=0.55974pt,depth=0.0pt,width=5.59721pt}E_{0}(F)=d\mu(E\cap F) is the restricted measure. By Theorem 2.2 we have ‖ρ‖C0≤C⁡(n,α,A)\left\lVert\rho\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq C(n,\alpha,A), since the RHS measure satisfies a Skoda estimate. We choose a=max⁡(C⁡(n,α,A),A′)a=\max(C(n,\alpha,A),A^{\prime}), so that

−a≤ρ≤0,ϕ≥−a,-a\leq\rho\leq 0,\quad\phi\geq-a,

implying the set inclusion

E′={ϕ>2as+smaxϕ}⊂E={(1−s)ϕ+sρ−as>0}⊂E0.E^{\prime}=\{\phi>2as+s\max\phi\}\subset E=\{(1-s)\phi+s\rho-as>0\}\subset E_{0}.

Our next goal is to show d​μ​(E′)d\mu(E^{\prime}) is small.

Let G={1−s2≥d​νd​μ}⊂Y∖SG=\{1-s^{2}\geq\frac{d\nu}{d\mu}\}\subset Y\setminus S. On the open set E0∖(S∪G)E_{0}\setminus(S\cup G), by the concavity Lemma 2.5,

ωs​ρ+(1−s)​ϕnVol​(Y)≥(sdμ(E0)−1/n+(1−s)(1−s2)1/n)ndμ.\frac{\omega_{s\rho+(1-s)\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}\geq\left(sd\mu(E_{0})^{-1/n}+(1-s)(1-s^{2})^{1/n}\right)^{n}d\mu.

Now dμ(E0)−1/n≥(1−λ)−1/nd\mu(E_{0})^{-1/n}\geq(1-\lambda)^{-1/n} by assumption. Choose 0<q<n{(1−λ)−1/n−1}0<q<n\{(1-\lambda)^{-1/n}-1\}, so for 0<s≪10<s\ll 1 depending on λ,n\lambda,n, by Taylor expansion in ss,

(sdμ(E0)−1/n+(1−s)(1−s2)1/n)n≥1+qs.\left(sd\mu(E_{0})^{-1/n}+(1-s)(1-s^{2})^{1/n}\right)^{n}\geq 1+qs.

Combining this with the comparison principle Lemma 2.4, and the assumption d​μ​(S)=0d\mu(S)=0,

(1+q​s)​∫E∖G𝑑μ≤∫Eωs​ρ+(1−s)​ϕnVol​(Y)≤∫EωnVol​(Y)=∫E𝑑μ.(1+qs)\int_{E\setminus G}d\mu\leq\int_{E}\frac{\omega_{s\rho+(1-s)\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}\leq\int_{E}\frac{\omega^{n}}{\text{Vol}(Y)}=\int_{E}d\mu.

On the other hand, by the definition of GG and the L1L^{1}-stability assumption,

d​μ​(G)≤s−2​∫G(𝑑μ−𝑑ν)≤s−2​∫Y|𝑑μ−𝑑ν|≤s2​n+1,d\mu(G)\leq s^{-2}\int_{G}(d\mu-d\nu)\leq s^{-2}\int_{Y}|d\mu-d\nu|\leq s^{2n+1},

hence

(1+q​s)​∫E∖G𝑑μ≤∫E∖G𝑑μ+s2​n+1.(1+qs)\int_{E\setminus G}d\mu\leq\int_{E\setminus G}d\mu+s^{2n+1}.

We conclude ∫E∖G𝑑μ≤q−1​s2​n\int_{E\setminus G}d\mu\leq q^{-1}s^{2n}, so

∫E′𝑑μ≤∫E𝑑μ≤q−1​s2​n+s2​n+1≤(q−1+1)​s2​n.\int_{E^{\prime}}d\mu\leq\int_{E}d\mu\leq q^{-1}s^{2n}+s^{2n+1}\leq(q^{-1}+1)s^{2n}.

We now apply the stability estimate Cor. 2.3 to compare the potentials ϕ\phi and 00, to see for ss sufficiently small depending on n,A,A′,α,λn,A,A^{\prime},\alpha,\lambda,

minY⁡(−ϕ)≥−2​a​s−s​maxY​ϕ−4​B​(∫E′𝑑μ)1/2​n≥−2​a​s−s​maxY​ϕ−4​B​(1+q−1)1/2​n​s,\min_{Y}(-\phi)\geq-2as-s\max_{Y}\phi-4B(\int_{E^{\prime}}d\mu)^{1/2n}\geq-2as-s\max_{Y}\phi-4B(1+q^{-1})^{1/2n}s,

whence maxY⁡ϕ≤C⁡(n,A,A′,α,λ)​s\max_{Y}\phi\leq C(n,A,A^{\prime},\alpha,\lambda)s as required. ∎

Remark 2.7.

It is not clear to the author why in Kolodziej’s original argument [30, Lemma 1.2] applies in the proof of [30, Thm. 4.1], as E0∖GE_{0}\setminus G is not an open domain if one considers general LpL^{p}-densities.

2.4 Savin’s small perturbation theorem

Savin [40] proved that for a large class of second order elliptic equations satisfying certain structural conditions, any viscosity solution C0C^{0}-close to a given smooth solution has interior C2,γC^{2,\gamma}-bound. In particular this applies to complex MA equation. Combined with the Schauder estimate,

Theorem 2.8.

Fix k≥2k\geq 2 and 0<γ<10<\gamma<1. On the unit ball, let vv be a given smooth solution to the complex Monge-Ampère equation (d​dc​v)n=1(dd^{c}v)^{n}=1. Then there are constants 0<κ≪10<\kappa\ll 1 and CC depending on n,k,γ,‖v‖Ck,γn,k,\gamma,\left\lVert v\right\rVert_{C^{k,\gamma}}, such that if

(d​dc​(u+v))n=1+f,‖f‖Ck−2,γ<κ,(dd^{c}(u+v))^{n}=1+f,\quad\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{k-2,\gamma}}<\kappa,

and ‖u‖C0<κ\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{0}}<\kappa, then ‖u‖Ck,γ​(B1/2)≤C​κ\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{k,\gamma}(B_{1/2})}\leq C\kappa.

2.5 Regularity theory for real Monge-Ampère

There is an extensive literature on the local regularity theory for the real Monge-Ampère equation, largely due to the Caffarelli school. The author thanks C. Mooney for bringing some of these results to his attention. All results surveyed here can be found in [35].

Any convex function on an open set v:Ω⊂ℝn→ℝv:\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} has an associated Borel measure called the Monge-Ampère measure, defined by

M​Aℝ​(v)​(E)=|∂v⁡(E)|,MA_{\mathbb{R}}(v)(E)=|\partial v(E)|,

where |∂v⁡(E)||\partial v(E)| denotes the Lebesgue measure of the image of the subgradient map on E⊂ΩE\subset\Omega. Given a Borel measure μ\mu, a solution to M​A​(v)=μMA(v)=\mu is called an Aleksandrov solution to det(D2​v)=μ;\det(D^{2}v)=\mu; if v∈C2v\in C^{2}, this is the classical real Monge-Ampère equation. We shall assume a two-sided density bound

det(D2​v)=f​ in ​B1,0<Λ1≤f≤Λ2.\det(D^{2}v)=f\text{ in }B_{1},\quad 0<\Lambda_{1}\leq f\leq\Lambda_{2}.

Let B1∖ΣB_{1}\setminus\Sigma be the set of strictly convex points of vv, namely there is a supporting hyperplane touching the graph of vv only at one point. Then Caffarelli [8][9][10] shows

  • •

    If f∈Cγ​(B1)f\in C^{\gamma}(B_{1}), then v∈Cl​o​c2,γ​(B1∖Σ)v\in C^{2,\gamma}_{loc}(B_{1}\setminus\Sigma). Then by Schauder theory, if ff is smooth, then vv is smooth in B1∖ΣB_{1}\setminus\Sigma.

  • •

    If LL is a supporting affine linear function to vv, such that the convex set {v=L}\{v=L\} is not a point. Then {v=L}\{v=L\} has no extremal point in the interior of B1B_{1}.

  • •

    The above affine linear set {v=L}\{v=L\} has dimension k<n/2k<n/2.

Mooney [35] shows further that

  • •

    The singular set Σ\Sigma has (n−1)(n-1)-Hausdorff measure zero. Consequently B1∖ΣB_{1}\setminus\Sigma is path connected (because a generic path joining two given points does not intersect a subset of zero (n−1)(n-1)-Hausdorff measure).

  • •

    The solution v∈Wl​o​c2,1​(B1)v\in W^{2,1}_{loc}(B_{1}) even if Σ\Sigma is nonempty.

Remark 2.9.

A classical counterexample of Pogorelov shows that for n=3n=3, the singular set Σ\Sigma can contain a line segment. This is generalised by Caffarelli [10], who for any k<n/2k<n/2 constructs examples where ff is smooth but Σ\Sigma contains a kk-plane. A surprising example of Mooney [35] shows that the Hausdorff dimension of Σ\Sigma can be larger than n−1−ϵn-1-\epsilon for any small ϵ\epsilon. This means the local regularity theory surveyed above is essentially optimal.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.