ScalingStacks

Proof. [00AF]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By construction in Lemma 4.1, the local potential ϕJ,t\phi_{J,t} of ωF​S,t\omega_{FS,t} is ϵ\epsilon-close to ϕ0∘Log𝒳\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}, and since ϵ≪κ\epsilon\ll\kappa these two are practically the same. Up to an overall normalisation constant, which is fixed by inf=0\inf=0, we have ϕC​Y,J,t=ϕC​Y,t+ϕJ,t,\phi_{CY,J,t}=\phi_{CY,t}+\phi_{J,t}, so the measure bound follows from the previous result.

The uniform L∞L^{\infty} bound follows from Prop. 4.3 and Lemma 4.1 without any reference to λ,κ\lambda,\kappa. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.