Lemma 4.12.
Let be the model space with a fixed fiber . Let and let
satisfy the expansion
| (4.123) |
|
|
|
In addition, assume that there is some such that for every ,
| (4.124) |
|
|
|
then for every and ,
| (4.125) |
|
|
|
where the constant is independent of and .
Lemma 4.13.
Consider the inhomogeneous ordinary differential equation
| (4.128) |
|
|
|
where is the constant defined in (4.106).
Assume that the function satisfies the following property:
there are constants
| (4.129) |
|
|
|
and such that
| (4.130) |
|
|
|
Let be the particular solution defined by
| (4.131) |
|
|
|
where
| (4.132) |
|
|
|
| (4.133) |
|
|
|
and is the Wronskian
| (4.134) |
|
|
|
Then there are constants and which are independent of such that the particular solution satisfies the uniform estimate
| (4.135) |
|
|
|
Proof.
We will prove that there exists some constant such that
| (4.136) |
|
|
|
and
| (4.137) |
|
|
|
where the positive constant is independent of the index .
We prove (4.136) and (4.137) in two different cases.
In the first case, satisfies . The fundamental solutions have an explicit form
| (4.138) |
|
|
|
and
| (4.139) |
|
|
|
Immediately,
| (4.140) |
|
|
|
and hence for ,
| (4.141) |
|
|
|
Similarly,
| (4.142) |
|
|
|
In the latter case and , we will prove the uniform estimates.
A crucial point is to apply the monotonicity in Lemma 4.9. In fact,
|
|
|
|
| (4.143) |
|
|
|
|
where . We choose and denote , then
by Lemma 4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (4.144) |
|
|
|
|
The proof of (4.136) is done.
Next, for the estimate (4.137),
|
|
|
|
| (4.145) |
|
|
|
|
This completes the proof of the proposition.
Proof.
The proof follows from the standard elliptic regularity. Indeed, the eigenfunction satisfies the elliptic equation
| (4.147) |
|
|
|
It follows from the standard elliptic regularity that there exists some constant depending only the metric such that
| (4.148) |
|
|
|
Applying the Sobolev embedding theorem,
| (4.149) |
|
|
|
where depends only on the metric . The proof is complete.
β
Proposition 4.15 (Sovability of Poisson Equation).
Let be the Calabi space, there is some constant which depends only on such that the following property holds: given any
| (4.150) |
|
|
|
if for
and , then the equation
| (4.151) |
|
|
|
has a solution with
| (4.152) |
|
|
|
for any .
Proof.
The proof of the proposition is constructive.
The basic strategy is to apply separation of variables to construct a solution to the equation (4.151).
Given a function and for any fixed , there is an expansion over the fiber ,
| (4.153) |
|
|
|
Separation of variables enables us to construct
a formal solution
| (4.154) |
|
|
|
to the equation (4.151),
where are the particular solutions in Lemma 4.13.
Since a priori the above series is defined in the -topology along each fiber , we need to verify the higher order convergence of the series, which will indicate that is a regular solution to (4.151).
First, we will show that the above series converges in the -topology and thus is a -function. The main point is to reduce the uniform convergence to the convergence of certain numerical series involving only in the eigenvalues of a definite fiber . Indeed, Lemma 4.12 guarantees that the solutions satisfy all the conditions in Lemma 4.13. Since we have obtained in Lemma 4.13 the uniform estimate for the ODE solutions
and also in Lemma 4.14
the uniform estimate for the eigenfunctions, the -expansion has the following bound,
| (4.155) |
|
|
|
Since the spectrum of Laplacian obeys Weylβs
law on , it follows that for sufficiently large ,
| (4.156) |
|
|
|
where depends only on .
Plugging the above asymptotics into (4.155), we have that
| (4.157) |
|
|
|
and hence
| (4.158) |
|
|
|
Therefore,
and exponentially decays.
Next, we will apply the standard elliptic regularity on the Calabi manifold
to show that and thus is a regular solution.
For the expansions
| (4.159) |
|
|
|
we denote by
| (4.160) |
|
|
|
the partial sums of and respectively.
Immediately,
| (4.161) |
|
|
|
For every , we will apply the elliptic regularity on the ball to obtain the higher regularity of . For this purpose, first we prove the following claim.
Claim 4.16.
As ,
.
Proof.
The proof of the claim follows from basically from Weylβs law.
For the partial sum of ,
| (4.162) |
|
|
|
Applying integration by parts,
|
|
|
|
| (4.163) |
|
|
|
|
where .
Notice that, the spectrum satisfies the Weylβs law on , so in particular for sufficiently large ,
| (4.164) |
|
|
|
Since ,
| (4.165) |
|
|
|
The proof of the claim is done.
β
The proof of the higher order convergence is exactly the same. In fact, we just need to replace with the higher order norm with .
Since , the standard - implies that regularity
for every , . By assumption with , we have
. Hence the regularity of will be improved as follows, for every ,
| (4.166) |
|
|
|
Now taking and applying the Sobolev embedding,
| (4.167) |
|
|
|
which implies that converges to a smooth solution . Then applying the standard Schauder estimate and bootstrapping, the statement of the proposition just follows.