6.2. The attaching maps and constraints [03IL]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
6.2. The attaching maps and constraints
We next define the “attaching maps” which will be used to construct the manifold . Let
| (6.37) |
using the above coordinates on the end of . Define
| (6.38) |
by .
Simlarly, let
| (6.39) |
using the above coordinates on the end of . Define
| (6.40) |
be defined by , where is the diffeomorphism given by
| (6.41) |
We obtain the manifold by gluing the pieces together using the attaching maps:
| (6.42) |
The manifold carries an orientation compatible with both Tian-Yau pieces, and we will fix this orientation in the following.
Next, we want the potentials to agree up to the constant term in the damage zones after identifying the corresponding regions by the attaching maps. On we have
| (6.43) | ||||
| (6.44) |
which we want to equal to the leading terms of , so we must have
| (6.45) |
Similarly, on the other damage zone we have
| (6.46) | ||||
| (6.47) |
which we want to equal to the leading terms of , so we must have
| (6.48) |
Remark 6.2.
If both and , then there is no constraint. This is the already known gluing [CC16], so we do not need to analyze this case further.
To summarize: the gluing procedure requires
| (6.49) |
Immediately, the above constraints give free parameter . So and are completely determined by in the case and , i.e.,
| (6.50) |
Remark 6.3.
We emphasize that we are fixing all the other gluing parameters so that only varies. We will prove some effective estimates in Section 8 and Section 9 which give uniform etimates for the linearized gluing operator (defined in Section 1.3) and for sufficiently large . We also note that the estimates are unifrom as long as other parameters vary in compact sets.