ScalingStacks

7.2. Regularity of the approximate metrics [03J2]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

7.2. Regularity of the approximate metrics

In this subsection, we prove uniform curvature estimates on ℳ\mathcal{M} which will be crucial in showing that certain rescalings of the approximate metric have bounded curvature. We will show two different ways to understand the regularity.

The first way is to directly compute the curvature tensors. Since the Gibbons-Hawking metric has an explicit form in terms of the defining harmonic function, the curvature estimates just follow from straightforward calculations. The following lemma gives sharp curvature estimates for every point on ℳ\mathcal{M}.

Lemma 7.2.

The following uniform curvature estimates hold for every point in ℳ\mathcal{M}:

  1. (1)

    Let r⁡(𝒙)r(\bm{x}) denote the Euclidean distance to the monopole points, then there exists constants C>0C>0 so that such that for each 1≤m≤m01\leq m\leq m_{0} for every 𝒙∈Br0​(pm)\bm{x}\in B_{r_{0}}(p_{m}) with r0≡12​InjRadg0⁡(𝕋2)r_{0}\equiv\frac{1}{2}\InjRad_{g_{0}}(\mathbb{T}^{2}), the following curvature estimates hold,

    (7.22) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤{C​β,0≤r⁡(𝒙)<β−1,Cβ2​r​(𝒙)3,β−1≤r⁡(𝒙)<r0.\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\begin{cases}C\beta,&0\leq r(\bm{x})<\beta^{-1},\\ \frac{C}{\beta^{2}r(\bm{x})^{3}},&\beta^{-1}\leq r(\bm{x})<r_{0}.\end{cases}

    In terms of the intrinsic distance function with respect to the Riemannian metric gjg_{j},

    (7.23) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤{C​β,0≤r⁡(𝒙)<β−1,Cβ12​dm​(𝒙)3,β−1≤r⁡(𝒙)<r0.\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\begin{cases}C\beta,&0\leq r(\bm{x})<\beta^{-1},\\ \frac{C}{\beta^{\frac{1}{2}}d_{m}(\bm{x})^{3}},&\beta^{-1}\leq r(\bm{x})<r_{0}.\end{cases}
  2. (2)

    If 𝒙\bm{x} is in the neck region but has some definite distance away from the monopoles, the following curvature estimates hold for some uniform constant C>0C>0,

    (7.24) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤{Cβ2​z​(𝒙),r010<|z⁡(𝒙)|<β,Cβ3,−T1≤z⁡(𝒙)≤−β​and​β≤z⁡(𝒙)<T2.\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\begin{cases}\frac{C}{\beta^{2}z(\bm{x})},&\frac{r_{0}}{10}<|z(\bm{x})|<\beta,\\ \frac{C}{\beta^{3}},&-T_{1}\leq z(\bm{x})\leq-\beta\text{and}\ \beta\leq z(\bm{x})<T_{2}.\end{cases}
  3. (3)

    For 𝒙∈Xb±​(T±)⊂ℳ\bm{x}\in X_{b_{\pm}}(T_{\pm})\subset\mathcal{M}, there is a constant CC so that

    (7.25) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤{Cd⁡(𝒙)<ζ±Cd​(𝒙)2d⁡(𝒙)≥ζ±,\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\begin{cases}C&d(\bm{x})<\zeta_{\pm}\\ \frac{C}{d(\bm{x})^{2}}&d(\bm{x})\geq\zeta_{\pm},\end{cases}

    where d⁡(𝒙)d(\bm{x}) is the distance to a base point in Xb±X_{b\pm}.

  4. (4)

    For 𝒙∈D​Z±⊂ℳ\bm{x}\in DZ_{\pm}\subset\mathcal{M}, there is a constant C>0C>0 so that

    (7.26) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cβ3.\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{\beta^{3}}.
Remark 7.3.

The curvature estimates in Lemma 7.2 are sharp in the following sense. The second estimate in (7.22) and (7.23) corresponds to the curvature behavior of the Taub-NUT metric which is exactly of cubic decay. The curvature estimate in (7.25) is sharp as well because the curvatures decay quadratically in the end of a complete Tian-Yau space.

Proof.

The proof only requires straightforward calculations, so we only sketch the calculations. We use the following formula for the pointwise norm squared of the curvature of a Gibbons-Hawking metric

(7.27) |Rm|2=12​Vβ−1​Δ2​(Vβ−1),\displaystyle|\Rm|^{2}=\frac{1}{2}V_{\beta}^{-1}\Delta^{2}(V_{\beta}^{-1}),

see [GW00]. We just need to consider the case of 11 monopole point located at the origin, the case of several monopole points follows easily from this case. Let r0≡12​InjRadg0⁡(𝕋2)r_{0}\equiv\frac{1}{2}\InjRad_{g_{0}}(\mathbb{T}^{2}), then we have the expansion

(7.28) Vβ​(𝒙)=12​r​(𝒙)+β+h⁡(𝒙),x∈Br0​(03),\displaystyle V_{\beta}(\bm{x})=\frac{1}{2r(\bm{x})}+\beta+h(\bm{x}),\ x\in B_{r_{0}}(0^{3}),

where hh is a bounded harmonic function.

First, we estimate the curvature in the case r⁡(𝒙)<1βr(\bm{x})<\frac{1}{\beta}. By (7.28),

(7.29) Vβ−1​(𝒙)=2​r1+2​r​β+2​r​h,\displaystyle V_{\beta}^{-1}(\bm{x})=\frac{2r}{1+2r\beta+2rh},

so it follows that

(7.30) Vβ−1=2​r1+2​r​β+2​r​h≤C​r​(1−2​r​β+4​r2​β2+8​r3​β3)\displaystyle V_{\beta}^{-1}=\frac{2r}{1+2r\beta+2rh}\leq Cr(1-2r\beta+4r^{2}\beta^{2}+8r^{3}\beta^{3})

for r<β−1r<\beta^{-1}, then

(7.31) |Vβ−1​Δ2​(Vβ−1)|≤C​r​β3,\displaystyle|V_{\beta}^{-1}\Delta^{2}(V_{\beta}^{-1})|\leq Cr\beta^{3},

and the first claimed estimate follows from this.

Before showing the curvature estimates in other regions, we relate the intrinsic distance function dm​(𝒙)d_{m}(\bm{x}) and the Euclidean radial function r⁡(𝒙)r(\bm{x}). By directly estimating the integral of Vβ\sqrt{V_{\beta}}, we have that

(7.32) 1C′⋅r⁡(𝒙)≤dm(𝒙)≤C′r⁡(x),r(𝒙)<β−1,1C′⋅β12⋅r⁡(𝒙)≤dm(𝒙)≤C′⋅β12⋅r(𝒙),r(𝒙)≥β−1,\displaystyle\begin{split}\frac{1}{C^{\prime}}\cdot\sqrt{r(\bm{x})}&\leq d_{m}(\bm{x})\leq C^{\prime}\sqrt{r\bm{(}x)},\ \hskip 17.0ptr(\bm{x})<\beta^{-1},\\ \frac{1}{C^{\prime}}\cdot\beta^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot r(\bm{x})&\leq d_{m}(\bm{x})\leq C^{\prime}\cdot\beta^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot r(\bm{x}),\ r(\bm{x})\geq\beta^{-1},\end{split}

where C′>0C^{\prime}>0 is some universal constant. So the first part of the curvature estimate in (7.23) immediately follows.

Next, let 𝒙∈Br0​(03)\bm{x}\in B_{r_{0}}(0^{3}) satisfy r⁡(𝒙)≥β−1r(\bm{x})\geq\beta^{-1}. Substituting (7.28) into (7.27), then similar expansion formula shows that for some uniform constant C>0C>0,

(7.33) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cβ2​r3​(𝒙).|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{\beta^{2}r^{3}(\bm{x})}.

Correspondingly in terms of the intrinsic distance function, the curvature estimate turns out to be

(7.34) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cβ12​dm​(𝒙)3.|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{\beta^{\frac{1}{2}}d_{m}(\bm{x})^{3}}.

The above in fact covers the curvature estimates in Region I and Region II.

From now on, we consider the case that 𝒙\bm{x} is in the neck region satisfying r010≤|z⁡(𝒙)|≤β\frac{r_{0}}{10}\leq|z(\bm{x})|\leq\beta. In this case, the harmonic function VβV_{\beta} has the expansion,

(7.35) Vβ​(𝒙)={2​π​b−​z​(𝒙)A+h−​(𝒙)+β,−T−≤z⁡(𝒙)≤−ζ0h⁡(𝒙)+β,−ζ0≤z⁡(𝒙)≤ζ0,−2​π​b+​z​(𝒙)A+h+​(𝒙)+β,ζ0≤z⁡(𝒙)≤T+.\displaystyle V_{\beta}(\bm{x})=\begin{cases}\frac{2\pi b_{-}z(\bm{x})}{A}+h_{-}(\bm{x})+\beta,&-T_{-}\leq z(\bm{x})\leq-\zeta_{0}\\ h(\bm{x})+\beta,&-\zeta_{0}\leq z(\bm{x})\leq\zeta_{0},\\ -\frac{2\pi b_{+}z(\bm{x})}{A}+h_{+}(\bm{x})+\beta,&\zeta_{0}\leq z(\bm{x})\leq T_{+}.\end{cases}

We apply the above expansion to the curvature formula (7.27), then we obtain the following curvature estimate

(7.36) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cβ2​z​(𝒙),|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{\beta^{2}z(\bm{x})},

where C>0C>0 is a uniform curvature estimate. Similarly, one can calculate that in the damage zones,

(7.37) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cβ3|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{\beta^{3}}

for some uniform constant C>0C>0. Note that the cutoff function and its derivatives up to third order are uniformly bounded, the curvature of the glued metric is therefore also of order β−3\beta^{-3} in the damage zone region.

Next, we recall from Section 2.2 that for the model spaces, the defining harmonic functions are V−​(𝒙)=2​π​b−​z​(𝒙)AV_{-}(\bm{x})=\frac{2\pi b_{-}z(\bm{x})}{A} and V+​(𝒙)=2​π​b+​z​(𝒙)AV_{+}(\bm{x})=\frac{2\pi b_{+}z(\bm{x})}{A}, so (7.27) implies that

(7.38) |Rm|​(𝒙)≤Cd​(𝒙)2,\displaystyle|\Rm|(\bm{x})\leq\frac{C}{d(\bm{x})^{2}},

for some uniform constant C>0C>0, so the complete end of the model space has exactly inverse quadratic curvature decay. It follows from Proposition 3.4 that the Tian-Yau metric does also.

∎

The curvature estimates in Lemma 7.2 relies on the explicit formulas of the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz. For the sake of conceptually understanding the collapsing behavior, we introduce the following ϵ\epsilon-regularity theorem for collapsed Einstein manifolds due to Naber and the fourth author of this paper (see [NZ16] for more details).

Theorem 7.4 (Naber-Zhang, [NZ16]).

Let (Mn,g,p)(M^{n},g,p) satisfy Ricg≡λ​g\Ric_{g}\equiv\lambda g and |λ|≤n−1|\lambda|\leq n-1. Given a manifold (Zk,zk)(Z^{k},z^{k}) with k=dim(Zk)<nk=\dim(Z^{k})<n, there are uniform constants δ0>0\delta_{0}>0, w0>0w_{0}>0 and C0>0C_{0}>0 which depend only on nn and the geometry of B1​(zk)B_{1}(z^{k}) such that the following property holds: if

(7.39) dG​H​(B2​(p),B2​(zk))<δ0,d_{GH}(B_{2}(p),B_{2}(z^{k}))<\delta_{0},

then the group Γδ0(p)≡Image[π1(Bδ0(p))→π1(B2(p))]\Gamma_{\delta_{0}}(p)\equiv\Image[\pi_{1}(B_{\delta_{0}}(p))\to\pi_{1}(B_{2}(p))] has a nilpotent subgroup 𝒩\mathcal{N} of index bounded by w0w_{0} such that rank⁡(𝒩)≤n−k\rank(\mathcal{N})\leq n-k.

Furthermore, if rank⁡(𝒩)=n−k\rank(\mathcal{N})=n-k, then supB1​(p)|Rm|≤C0\sup\limits_{B_{1}(p)}|\Rm|\leq C_{0}. Conversely, if supB3​(p)|Rm|≤C0\sup\limits_{B_{3}(p)}|\Rm|\leq C_{0}, then rank⁡(𝒩)=n−k\rank(\mathcal{N})=n-k.

Remark 7.5.

Given a finitely generated nilpotent group 𝒩\mathcal{N}, let 𝒩=𝒩0⊳𝒩1⊳…⊳𝒩m={e}\mathcal{N}=\mathcal{N}_{0}\rhd\mathcal{N}_{1}\rhd\ldots\rhd\mathcal{N}_{m}=\{e\} be the lower central series with abelian factor groups 𝒩j−1/𝒩j\mathcal{N}_{j-1}/\mathcal{N}_{j}, where 𝒩j+1≡[𝒩,𝒩j]\mathcal{N}_{j+1}\equiv[\mathcal{N},\mathcal{N}_{j}] are the commutator subgroups. Then the nilpotent rank of 𝒩\mathcal{N} is defined as the sum of the ranks of the abelian factors, i.e.

(7.40) rank⁡(𝒩)≡∑j=1mrank⁡(𝒩j−1/𝒩j).\rank(\mathcal{N})\equiv\sum\limits_{j=1}^{m}\rank(\mathcal{N}_{j-1}/\mathcal{N}_{j}).
Remark 7.6.

If the Einstein assumption is replaced with bounded Ricci curvature, then the uniform curvature bound can be replaced with bounded C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-covering geometry for any 0<α<10<\alpha<1. This can be used in analyzing the regularity of the damage zones.

In fact, theorem 7.4 has a quick proof in the special case of codimension-1 collapse which exactly applies in our case. For the readers’ convenience, we give the statement and the proof here.

Lemma 7.7.

Let (Mjn,gj,pj)(M_{j}^{n},g_{j},p_{j}) be a sequence of Einstein manifolds with |Ricgj|≤ϵj→0|\Ric_{g_{j}}|\leq\epsilon_{j}\to 0 such that

(7.41) (Mjn,gj,pj)→G​Hℝn−1(M_{j}^{n},g_{j},p_{j})\xrightarrow{GH}\mathbb{R}^{n-1}

and Γ2(pj)≡Image[π1(B2(pj))→π1(Mjn)]\Gamma_{2}(p_{j})\equiv\Image[\pi_{1}(B_{2}(p_{j}))\to\pi_{1}(M_{j}^{n})] is of infinite order. Then for any R>0R>0,

(7.42) supBR​(pj)|Rm|≤C0​(n)R2.\sup\limits_{B_{R}(p_{j})}|\Rm|\leq\frac{C_{0}(n)}{R^{2}}.
Remark 7.8.

Simple rescaling and contradicting arguments imply theorem 7.4 in the case k=n−1k=n-1, which is an effective version of the lemma.

Proof.

Let (Mjn~,g~j,Γj,p~j)(\widetilde{M_{j}^{n}},\tilde{g}_{j},\Gamma_{j},\tilde{p}_{j}) be the Riemannian universal covers of (Mjn,gj)(M_{j}^{n},g_{j}) which converge to the limit product space (ℝn−1×Y,d~∞,Γ∞,p~∞)(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y,\tilde{d}_{\infty},\Gamma_{\infty},\tilde{p}_{\infty}) in the equivariant Gromov-Hausdorff topology, where Γj≡π1​(Mjn)\Gamma_{j}\equiv\pi_{1}(M_{j}^{n}) and Γj→Γ∞≤Isom⁡(ℝn−1×Y)\Gamma_{j}\to\Gamma_{\infty}\leq\Isom(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y). See Section 3 of [FY92] for the precise definition of the equivariant Gromov-Hausdorff convergence. In summary, we have the following diagram

(7.43) (Mjn~,g~j,p~j)\textstyle{(\widetilde{M_{j}^{n}},\tilde{g}_{j},\tilde{p}_{j})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}e​q​G​H\scriptstyle{eqGH}prj\scriptstyle{\pr_{j}}ℝn−1×Y\textstyle{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}pr∞\scriptstyle{\pr_{\infty}}(Mjn,gj,pj)\textstyle{(M_{j}^{n},g_{j},p_{j})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G​H\scriptstyle{GH}ℝn−1,\textstyle{\mathbb{R}^{n-1},}

where the covering maps prj:Mjn~→Mjn\pr_{j}:\widetilde{M_{j}^{n}}\to M_{j}^{n} converge to a natural projection map pr∞:ℝn−1×Y→ℝn−1\pr_{\infty}:\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y\to\mathbb{R}^{n-1}.

The main part is to prove the claim that YY is isometric to ℝ\mathbb{R}.

Applying Cheeger-Colding’s quantitative splitting theorem (see [CC96]), the convergence assumption (7.41) implies that for any fixed R>0R>0, there are harmonic splitting maps Φj≡(uj(1),…,uj(n−1)):B10​R​(pj)→ℝn−1\Phi_{j}\equiv(u_{j}^{(1)},\ldots,u_{j}^{(n-1)}):B_{10R}(p_{j})\to\mathbb{R}^{n-1} which realize the Gromov-Hausdorff maps such that

(7.44) ∑α,β=1n−1⨏B5​R​(pj)|⟨∇uj(α),∇uj(β)⟩−δα​β|+∑α=1n−1⨏B5​R​(pj)|∇2uj(α)|2→0.\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta=1}^{n-1}\fint_{B_{5R}(p_{j})}|\langle\nabla u_{j}^{(\alpha)},\nabla u_{j}^{(\beta)}\rangle-\delta_{\alpha\beta}|+\sum\limits_{\alpha=1}^{n-1}\fint_{B_{5R}(p_{j})}|\nabla^{2}u_{j}^{(\alpha)}|^{2}\to 0.

Let Φ~j≡(u~j(1),…,u~j(n−1))\widetilde{\Phi}_{j}\equiv(\tilde{u}_{j}^{(1)},\ldots,\tilde{u}_{j}^{(n-1)}) be the lifted harmonic functions on the universal covers, then the volume comparison theorem implies that

(7.45) ∑α,β=1n−1⨏B5​R​(p~j)|⟨∇~​u~j(α),∇~​u~j(β)⟩−δα​β|+∑α=1n−1⨏B5​R​(p~j)|∇~2​u~j(α)|2→0.\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta=1}^{n-1}\fint_{B_{5R}(\tilde{p}_{j})}|\langle\tilde{\nabla}\tilde{u}_{j}^{(\alpha)},\tilde{\nabla}\tilde{u}_{j}^{(\beta)}\rangle-\delta_{\alpha\beta}|+\sum\limits_{\alpha=1}^{n-1}\fint_{B_{5R}(\tilde{p}_{j})}|\tilde{\nabla}^{2}\tilde{u}_{j}^{(\alpha)}|^{2}\to 0.

By the definition of the splitting maps, YY is the Gromov-Hausdorff limit of the level sets of the lifted splitting maps Φ~j−1​(0n−1)\widetilde{\Phi}_{j}^{-1}(0^{n-1}). Since Γ2​(pj)≤π1​(Mjn)\Gamma_{2}(p_{j})\leq\pi_{1}(M_{j}^{n}) is of infinite order which acts on M~jn\widetilde{M}_{j}^{n} isometrically and discretely, the limit space YY must be non-compact.

On other hand hand, notice that Φ~j−1​(0n−1)\widetilde{\Phi}_{j}^{-1}(0^{n-1}) is invariant under the deck transformation group Γj\Gamma_{j} and Γj\Gamma_{j} converge to some limiting group Γ∞≤Isom⁡(ℝn−1×Y)\Gamma_{\infty}\leq\Isom(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y) such that pr∞\pr_{\infty} is given by the quotient (ℝn−1×Y)/Γ∞=ℝn−1(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times Y)/\Gamma_{\infty}=\mathbb{R}^{n-1}. Hence Γ∞≤Isom⁡(Y)\Gamma_{\infty}\leq\Isom(Y) and Γ∞\Gamma_{\infty} acts homogeneously on YY.

Therefore, by standard arguments, the noncompact homogeneous space YY admits a line (see [CG72] or lemma 2.4 in [NZ16]). The Ricci curvature assumption implies that YY is isometric to ℝ\mathbb{R}. This completes the proof of the claim.

The curvature estimate (7.42) immediately follows from the ϵ\epsilon-regularity theorem for noncollapsed Einstein manifolds (for example see Section 7 in [CC97]).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.