ScalingStacks

7.1. Notations [03IX]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

7.1. Notations

Since the arguments in the next sections are very tedious and involved, in this subsection we will list some fixed constants and make necessary conventions which will be frequently used in the later proofs. Throughout the rest of the paper, the notation aj→aa_{j}\to a will implicitly mean the limit as j→∞j\rightarrow\infty, unless otherwise noted.

7.1.1. Tian-Yau spaces and their asymptotic rates

To start with, for two positive integers

(7.1) b−,b+∈{1,2,…,9},b_{-},b_{+}\in\{1,2,\ldots,9\},

let (Xb−4,gb−,q−)(X_{b_{-}}^{4},g_{b_{-}},q_{-}) and (Xb+4,gb+,q+)(X_{b_{{}_{+}}}^{4},g_{b_{+}},q_{+}) be fixed hyperkähler Tian-Yau spaces with reference points q−∈Xb−4q_{-}\in X_{b_{-}}^{4} and q+∈Xb+4q_{+}\in X_{b_{+}}^{4} such that their degrees are b−b_{-} and b+b_{+} respectively. See Section 3 for the definition of a Tian-Yau space and the natural coordinate outside a large compact subset. On (Xb−4,gb−,q−)(X_{b_{-}}^{4},g_{b_{-}},q_{-}) and (Xb+4,gb+,q+)(X_{b_{+}}^{4},g_{b_{+}},q_{+}), there are diffeomorphisms

(7.2) Φ±:[ζ0±,+∞)×Nilb±3→Xb±4∖K±\Phi_{\pm}:[\zeta_{0}^{\pm},+\infty)\times\Nil_{b_{\pm}}^{3}\rightarrow X_{b_{\pm}}^{4}\setminus K_{\pm}

between the Gibbons-Hawking space which models over a flat cylinder 𝕋2×ℝ\mathbb{T}^{2}\times\mathbb{R}. We define the definite constants D0±D_{0}^{\pm} by

(7.3) D0±≡The distance between​q±​and the level set​{𝒙∈Xb±4|z±​(𝒙)=ζ0±}.\displaystyle D_{0}^{\pm}\equiv\text{The distance between}\ q_{\pm}\ \text{and the level set}\ \{\bm{x}\in X_{b_{\pm}}^{4}|z_{\pm}(\bm{x})=\zeta_{0}^{\pm}\}.

Proposition 3.4 shows that there are some positive constants

(7.4) δ¯1>0,δ¯2>0\dl>0,\ \dr>0

such that for any k∈ℕk\in\mathbb{N},

(7.5) |∇g𝒞±k(Φ∗​ωT​Y±−ω𝒞±)|g𝒞±=O⁡(e−δ¯1⁡z±),|\nabla_{g_{\mathcal{C}}^{\pm}}^{k}(\Phi^{*}\omega_{TY}^{\pm}-\omega_{\mathcal{C}}^{\pm})|_{g_{\mathcal{C}}^{\pm}}=O(e^{-\dl z_{\pm}}),

where ωT​Y±\omega_{TY}^{\pm}, ω𝒞±\omega_{\mathcal{C}}^{\pm} are the Kähler forms on the Tian-Yau spaces Xb±4X_{b_{\pm}}^{4},and the Calabi model spaces respectively.

7.1.2. Some notations about the neck region

Now we fix some parameters in the neck region for the convenience of our discussions in the later sections.

Let 𝒫m0≡{p1,…,pm0}\mathcal{P}_{m_{0}}\equiv\{p_{1},\ldots,p_{m_{0}}\} be the set of monopoles on the flat cylinder (𝕋2×ℝ,g0)(\mathbb{T}^{2}\times\mathbb{R},g_{0}) with coordinates (x,y,z)(x,y,z) such that

  1. (1)

    z⁡(p1)=0z(p_{1})=0.

  2. (2)

    There are definite constants

    (7.6) ι0>0,T0>0\iota_{0}>0,\ T_{0}>0

    such that for all k≠lk\neq l, we have

    (7.7) ι0≤dg0​(pk,pl)≤T0.\iota_{0}\leq d_{g_{0}}(p_{k},p_{l})\leq T_{0}.

Around each monopole pm∈𝒫m0p_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{m_{0}}, we define the associated distance function

(7.8) dm​(𝒙)≡dg​(pm,𝒙),pm∈𝒫m0,𝒙∈(ℳ,g).d_{m}(\bm{x})\equiv d_{g}(p_{m},\bm{x}),\ p_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{m_{0}},\ \bm{x}\in(\mathcal{M},g).

In our proof, the following notations will also be needed. We fix definite constants

(7.9) ι0′>0,T0′>0\iota_{0}^{\prime}>0,\ T_{0}^{\prime}>0

such that for all 1≤m<l≤m01\leq m<l\leq m_{0}, then in terms of the Gibbons-Hawking metric of the neck region, we have

(7.10) ι0′⋅(β)12≤dg​(pm,pl)≤T0′⋅(β)12.\iota_{0}^{\prime}\cdot(\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq d_{g}(p_{m},p_{l})\leq T_{0}^{\prime}\cdot(\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}.

We have already defined in Section 6 the Gibbons-Hawking metric in the neck region 𝒩m04\mathcal{N}_{m_{0}}^{4}. Given a gluing parameter β>0\beta>0, by Theorem 2.6, the defining Green’s function VβV_{\beta} satisfies the asymptotic property that there are constants

(7.11) ϵ¯1>0,ϵ¯2>0\el>0,\ \er>0

such that for any k∈ℕk\in\mathbb{N} we have

(7.12) |∇k(Vβ−(2​π​b−A​z+β))|=O⁡(eϵ¯1⁡z),z→−∞\Big|\nabla^{k}\Big(V_{\beta}-\Big(\frac{2\pi b_{-}}{A}z+\beta\Big)\Big)\Big|=O(e^{\el z}),\qquad z\to-\infty

and

(7.13) |∇k(Vβ−(−2​π​b+A​z+β))|=O⁡(e−ϵ¯2⁡z),z→+∞.\Big|\nabla^{k}\Big(V_{\beta}-\Big(-\frac{2\pi b_{+}}{A}z+\beta\Big)\Big)\Big|=O(e^{-\er z}),\qquad z\to+\infty.

The following functions defined on 𝒩m04\mathcal{N}_{m_{0}}^{4} as well as on the Tian-Yau pieces are crucial in analyzing the rescaled limits and the definition of the weight function in the next section, which naturally comes from the construction of the model metric:

  1. (1)

    On the negative part of the neck region, we define the function

    (7.14) L−​(𝒙)≡(2​π​b−A⋅z⁡(𝒙)+β)12,−T−≤z⁡(𝒙)<0L_{-}(\bm{x})\equiv\Big(\frac{2\pi b_{-}}{A}\cdot z(\bm{x})+\beta\Big)^{\frac{1}{2}},\ -T_{-}\leq z(\bm{x})<0
  2. (2)

    On the positive part of the neck region, we define the function

    (7.15) L+(𝒙)≡(−2​π​b+A⋅z(𝒙)+β)12, 0≤z(𝒙)<T+L_{+}(\bm{x})\equiv\Big(-\frac{2\pi b_{+}}{A}\cdot z(\bm{x})+\beta\Big)^{\frac{1}{2}},\ 0\leq z(\bm{x})<T_{+}
  3. (3)

    For 𝒙∈ℳ\bm{x}\in\mathcal{M} located in the end region of Xb−4X_{b_{-}}^{4} and satisfy ζ0−≤z−​(𝒙)≤T−\zeta_{0}^{-}\leq z_{-}(\bm{x})\leq T_{-}, we define

    (7.16) L¯−​(𝒙)≡(2​π​b−A⋅z−​(𝒙))12\underline{L}_{-}(\bm{x})\equiv\Big(\frac{2\pi b_{-}}{A}\cdot z_{-}(\bm{x})\Big)^{\frac{1}{2}}
  4. (4)

    For 𝒙∈ℳ\bm{x}\in\mathcal{M} located in the end region of Xb+4X_{b_{+}}^{4} and satisfy ζ0+≤z+​(𝒙)≤T+\zeta_{0}^{+}\leq z_{+}(\bm{x})\leq T_{+}, we define

    (7.17) L¯+​(𝒙)≡(2​π​b+A⋅z+​(𝒙))12.\underline{L}_{+}(\bm{x})\equiv\Big(\frac{2\pi b_{+}}{A}\cdot z_{+}(\bm{x})\Big)^{\frac{1}{2}}.

7.1.3. Subdivision of the manifold ℳ\mathcal{M}

Fix a gluing parameter β>1\beta>1, the manifold (ℳ,gβ)(\mathcal{M},g_{\beta}) will be divided into the following 99 regions depending on the different collapsing behaviors of metric gg:

I:dm​(𝒙)≤β−12​for some​ 1≤m≤m0\displaystyle\I:\ d_{m}(\bm{x})\leq\beta^{-\frac{1}{2}}\ \text{for some}\ 1\leq m\leq m_{0}
    (in the neck, very close to a monopole point)
II: 2​β−12≤dm​(𝒙)≤ι0′4⋅(β)12​ for some​ 1≤m≤m0\displaystyle\II:\ 2\beta^{-\frac{1}{2}}\leq d_{m}(\bm{x})\leq\frac{\iota_{0}^{\prime}}{4}\cdot(\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\text{ for some}\ 1\leq m\leq m_{0}
    (in the neck, not close, but not too far from any monopole point)
III:z⁡(𝒙)∈[−m0​T0,m0​T0]​and ​dm​(𝒙)≥ι0′2⋅(β)12​ for all​ 1≤m≤m0\displaystyle\III:\ z(\bm{x})\in[-m_{0}T_{0},m_{0}T_{0}]\ \text{and }d_{m}(\bm{x})\geq\frac{\iota_{0}^{\prime}}{2}\cdot(\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\text{ for all}\ 1\leq m\leq m_{0}
    (in a bounded region of the neck, but far from any monopole point)
IV−:z(𝒙)∈[−T−/2,−2m0T0]\displaystyle\IV_{-}:\ z(\bm{x})\in[-T_{-}/2,-2m_{0}T_{0}]
    (in the negative end region of the neck)
IV+:z⁡(𝒙)∈[2​m0​T0,T+/2]\displaystyle\IV_{+}:\ z(\bm{x})\in[2m_{0}T_{0},T_{+}/2]
    (in the positive end region of the neck)
V−:𝒙∈Xb−4​and​ 2​ζ0−≤z−​(𝒙)≤T−\displaystyle\V_{-}:\ \bm{x}\in X_{b_{-}}^{4}\ \text{and}\ 2\zeta_{0}^{-}\leq z_{-}(\bm{x})\leq T_{-}
    (in the end region of Xb−4X_{b_{-}}^{4})
V+:𝒙∈Xb+4​and​ 2​ζ0+≤z+​(𝒙)≤T+\displaystyle\V_{+}:\ \bm{x}\in X_{b_{+}}^{4}\ \text{and}\ 2\zeta_{0}^{+}\leq z_{+}(\bm{x})\leq T_{+}
    (in the end region of Xb+X_{b_{+}})
VI−:𝒙∈BD0−​(q−)¯⊂Xb−4\displaystyle\VI_{-}:\ \bm{x}\in\overline{B_{D_{0}^{-}}(q_{-})}\subset X_{b_{-}}^{4}
    (in the bounded part of Xb−4X_{b_{-}}^{4})
VI+:𝒙∈BD0+​(q+)¯⊂Xb+4\displaystyle\VI_{+}:\ \bm{x}\in\overline{B_{D_{0}^{+}}(q_{+})}\subset X_{b_{+}}^{4}
(in the bounded part of Xb+4).\displaystyle\hskip 28.45274pt\mbox{(in the bounded part of $X_{b_{+}}^{4}$)}.

We note that for 𝒙∈IV±\bm{x}\in\IV_{\pm}, we have

(7.18) T0′​(β)12≤dm​(𝒙)≤R±​ for all​ 1≤m≤m0,\displaystyle T_{0}^{\prime}(\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq d_{m}(\bm{x})\leq R_{\pm}\text{ for all}\ 1\leq m\leq m_{0},

where

(7.19) R−\displaystyle R_{-} ≡sup{dg​(x,p1)|−T−≤z⁡(𝒙)≤0},\displaystyle\equiv\sup\Big\{d_{g}(x,p_{1})\Big|-T_{-}\leq z(\bm{x})\leq 0\Big\},
(7.20) R+\displaystyle R_{+} ≡sup{dg​(x,p1)|0≤z⁡(𝒙)≤T+}.\displaystyle\equiv\sup\Big\{d_{g}(x,p_{1})\Big|0\leq z(\bm{x})\leq T_{+}\Big\}.

Immediately, there is some constant C>0C>0 (independent of β\beta) such that

(7.21) C−1​β32≤R±≤C​β32.C^{-1}\beta^{\frac{3}{2}}\leq R_{\pm}\leq C\beta^{\frac{3}{2}}.
Remark 7.1.

Notice that the above regions do not completely cover the manifold ℳ\mathcal{M}. However, each gap region shares the geometric behavior with the adjacent regions in the above subdivision. Therefore, the curvature estimates and the rescaled geometries in each gap region will be the same as in the adjacent regions, so we will ignore these gap regions in the following.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.