Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
For simplicity, we will calculate the asymptotic behavior in .
For fixed and , as , it is straightforward that
| (4.66) |
|
|
|
which implies that
| (4.67) |
|
|
|
First, we prove the asymptotics for .
As in the proof of Lemma 4.6, we get
|
|
|
|
| (4.68) |
|
|
|
|
Notice that
| (4.69) |
|
|
|
and
| (4.70) |
|
|
|
Moreover, by (4.66), .
It follows that
| (4.71) |
|
|
|
Combining the above limit and (4.67), the proof of (4.64) is complete.
In the case and ,
we will prove the asymptotic behavior of and we write
|
|
|
|
| (4.72) |
|
|
|
|
We claim that
| (4.73) |
|
|
|
In fact, it is straightforward that for any ,
| (4.74) |
|
|
|
and for any fixed ,
| (4.75) |
|
|
|
Applying the dominated convergence theorem,
| (4.76) |
|
|
|
This completes the proof the the claim.
Next, by the definition of the gamma function,
| (4.77) |
|
|
|
Therefore,
| (4.78) |
|
|
|
Since and yields to the asymptotic property (4.67), eventually we obtain
(4.65).
∎