ScalingStacks

Remark 3.2 . [03GU]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 3.2.

In [TY90] the volume growth and curvature decay rates of the nn-dimensional Calabi metric ω𝒞\omega_{\mathcal{C}} are estimated as O⁡(r2​nn+1)O(r^{\frac{2n}{n+1}}) and O⁡(r−2n+1)O(r^{-\frac{2}{n+1}}), respectively. When n=2n=2, this suggests that |Rm||{\rm Rm}| is borderline not in L2L^{2}. However, while the volume estimate is sharp for all nn, the curvature estimate is sharp only for n≥3n\geq 3. For n=2n=2, the leading term in the asymptotic expansion of the curvature vanishes because the Calabi-Yau metric on an elliptic curve is flat, and the true curvature decay rate of ω𝒞\omega_{\mathcal{C}} for n=2n=2 is O⁡(r−2)O(r^{-2}). This was also pointed out by R. Kobayashi in [Kob90] but is perhaps most easily seen in the Gibbons-Hawking picture.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.