ScalingStacks

5 Differential forms on algebraic varieties [0365]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5 Differential forms on algebraic varieties

On a complex analytic manifold MM, we use open analytic charts φ:U→ℂr\varphi:U\rightarrow{\mathbb{C}}^{r} to define (p,q)(p,q)-forms on UU by pull-back. The idea in the non-archimedean setting is similar replacing the above charts by tropical charts (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) from the previous section in order to pull-back Lagerberg’s superforms to Uan{U^{\rm an}}.

In this section, KK is an algebraically closed field endowed with a complete non-trivial non-archimedean absolute value |⁣||\phantom{a}|. Let v:=−log||v:=-\log|\phantom{a}| be the associated valuation and let Γ:=v⁡(K×)\Gamma:=v(K^{\times}) be the value group. The theory could be done for arbitrary fields (see [CD12]), but it is no serious restriction to assume that KK is algebraically closed as the theory is stable under base extension and in the classical setting, the analysis is also done over ℂ{\mathbb{C}}. We will introduce (p,q)(p,q)-forms on the analytification Xan{X^{\rm an}} of a nn-dimensional algebraic variety XX over KK.

5.1

We recall from 4.15 that a tropical chart (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) consists of an open subset VV of Uan{U^{\rm an}} for a very affine open subset UU of XX such that V=tropU−1​(Ω)V={\rm trop}_{U}^{-1}(\Omega) for an open subset Ω\Omega of Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U). Here, φU:U→TU\varphi_{U}:U\rightarrow T_{U} is the canonical moment map. It is a closed embedding to the torus TU=Spec⁡(K⁡[MU])T_{U}={\rm Spec}(K[M_{U}]). The tropical variety Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) is a tropical cycle of (NU)ℝ(N_{U})_{\mathbb{R}} and tropU:Uan→(NU)ℝ{\rm trop}_{U}:{U^{\rm an}}\rightarrow(N_{U})_{\mathbb{R}} is the tropicalization map. The embedding φU\varphi_{U} is only determined up to translation by an element in TU​(K)T_{U}(K) and hence the tropical constructions are canonical up to integral Γ\Gamma-affine isomorphisms.

Suppose that we have another tropical chart (V′,φU′)(V^{\prime},\varphi_{U^{\prime}}). Then (V∩V′,φU∩U′)(V\cap V^{\prime},\varphi_{U\cap U^{\prime}}) is a tropical chart (see Proposition 4.16) and we get a canonical affine homomorphism ψU,U∩U′:TU∩U′→TU\psi_{U,U\cap U^{\prime}}:T_{U\cap U^{\prime}}\rightarrow T_{U} of the underlying tori with φU=ψU,U∩U′∘φU∩U′\varphi_{U}=\psi_{U,U\cap U^{\prime}}\circ\varphi_{U\cap U^{\prime}} on U∩U′U\cap U^{\prime} (see 4.12). The associated affine map Trop⁡(ψU,U∩U′):(NU∩U′)ℝ→(NU)ℝ{\rm Trop}(\psi_{U,U\cap U^{\prime}}):(N_{U\cap U^{\prime}})_{\mathbb{R}}\rightarrow(N_{U})_{\mathbb{R}} maps the tropical variety Trop⁡(U∩U′){\rm Trop}(U\cap U^{\prime}) onto Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) (use Lemma 4.9). Then we define the restriction of the superform α∈Ap,q​(tropU​(V))\alpha\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U}(V)) to a superform α|V∩V′\alpha|_{V\cap V^{\prime}} on tropU∩U′​(V∩V′){\rm trop}_{U\cap U^{\prime}}(V\cap V^{\prime}) by using the pull-back to tropU∩U′​(V∩V′){\rm trop}_{U\cap U^{\prime}}(V\cap V^{\prime}) with respect to Trop⁡(ψU,U∩U′){\rm Trop}(\psi_{U,U\cap U^{\prime}}). This plays a crucial role in the following definition:

Definition 5.2

A differential form α\alpha of bidegree (p,q)(p,q) on an open subset VV of Xan{X^{\rm an}} is given by a covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} of VV by tropical charts (Vi,φUi)(V_{i},\varphi_{U_{i}}) of Xan{X^{\rm an}} and superforms αi∈Ap,q​(tropUi​(Vi))\alpha_{i}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U_{i}}(V_{i})) such that αi|Vi∩Vj=αj|Vi∩Vj\alpha_{i}|_{V_{i}\cap V_{j}}=\alpha_{j}|_{V_{i}\cap V_{j}} for every i,j∈Ii,j\in I. If α′\alpha^{\prime} is another differential form of bidegree (p,q)(p,q) on VV given by αj′∈Ap,q​(tropUj′​(Vj′))\alpha_{j}^{\prime}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U^{\prime}_{j}}(V_{j}^{\prime})) with respect to the tropical charts (Vj′,φUj′)j∈J(V_{j}^{\prime},\varphi_{U^{\prime}_{j}})_{j\in J} covering VV, then we consider α\alpha and α′\alpha^{\prime} as the same differential forms if and only if αi|Vi∩Vj′=αj′|Vi∩Vj′\alpha_{i}|_{V_{i}\cap V_{j}^{\prime}}=\alpha_{j}^{\prime}|_{V_{i}\cap V_{j}^{\prime}} for every i∈Ii\in I and j∈Jj\in J. We denote the space of (p,q)(p,q)-differential forms on VV by Ap,q​(V)A^{p,q}(V). As usual, we define the space of differential forms on VV by A⁡(V):=⨁p,qAp,q​(V)A(V):=\bigoplus_{p,q}A^{p,q}(V).

5.3

It is obvious from the definitions that the differential forms form a sheaf on Xan{X^{\rm an}}. Using the corresponding constructions for superforms on tropical cycles, it is immediate to define the wedge product and differential operators dd, d′d^{\prime}, d′′d^{\prime\prime} on differential forms on VV. By 4.6, we have Ap,q​(V)={0}A^{p,q}(V)=\{0\} if max⁡(p,q)>dim(X)\max(p,q)>\dim(X).

For a morphism φ:X′→X\varphi:X^{\prime}\rightarrow X and open subsets VV (resp. V′V^{\prime}) of Xan{X^{\rm an}} (resp. (X′)an(X^{\prime})^{\rm an}) with φ⁡(V′)⊂V\varphi(V^{\prime})\subset V, we get a pull-back φ∗:Ap,q​(V)→Ap,q​(V′)\varphi^{*}:A^{p,q}(V)\rightarrow A^{p,q}(V^{\prime}) defined in the following way: Suppose that α∈Ap,q​(V)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(V) is given by the covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} and the superforms αi∈Ap,q​(tropUi​(Vi))\alpha_{i}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U_{i}}(V_{i})) as above. Then there is a covering (Vj′)j∈J(V_{j}^{\prime})_{j\in J} of V′V^{\prime} by tropical charts (Vj′,φUj′)(V_{j}^{\prime},\varphi_{U_{j}^{\prime}}) which is subordinate to ((φan)−1​(Vi))i∈I((\varphi^{\rm an})^{-1}(V_{i}))_{i\in I}. This means that for every j∈Jj\in J, there is i⁡(j)∈Ii(j)\in I with Vj′⊂Vi⁡(j)V_{j}^{\prime}\subset V_{i(j)} and φ⁡(Uj′)⊂Ui⁡(j)\varphi(U_{j}^{\prime})\subset U_{i(j)} for the corresponding very affine open subsets. Then φ∗​(α)\varphi^{*}(\alpha) is the differential form on V′V^{\prime} given by the covering (Vj′)j∈J(V_{j}^{\prime})_{j\in J} and the superforms φ∗​(αi⁡(j))∈Ap,q​(Trop⁡(Uj′))\varphi^{*}(\alpha_{i(j)})\in A^{p,q}({\rm Trop}(U_{j}^{\prime})). We leave the details to the reader. This construction is functorial as usual.

Remark 5.4

We obtain the same sheaf of differential forms on Xan{X^{\rm an}} as in [CD12], §3. In the latter reference, all analytic moment maps were used to define differential forms on Xan{X^{\rm an}} and so it is clear that our differential forms here are also differential forms in the sense of [CD12]. To see the converse, we argue as follows: By Proposition 4.16, tropical charts (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) form a basis in Xan{X^{\rm an}}. It follows from Proposition 7.2 that an analytic moment map φ:V→(𝔾mr)an\varphi:V\rightarrow({\mathbb{G}}_{m}^{r})^{\rm an} may be locally in x∈Vx\in V approximated by an algebraic moment map φ′:U′→𝔾mr\varphi^{\prime}:U^{\prime}\rightarrow{\mathbb{G}}_{m}^{r} such that (φ′)trop=trop∘φ(\varphi^{\prime})_{\rm trop}={\rm trop}\circ\varphi in an open neighbourhood of xx in VV. Here, U′U^{\prime} is a suitable very affine open subset of UU with x∈(U′)anx\in(U^{\prime})^{\rm an}. It follows from [CD12], Lemma 3.1.10, that we may use algebraic moment maps to define differential forms in the sense of [CD12]. Using that φU′\varphi_{U^{\prime}} factorizes through φ′\varphi^{\prime} (see 4.12), we get the claim.

Definition 5.5

Let α\alpha be a differential form on an open subset VV of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. The support of α\alpha is the complement in VV of the set of points xx of VV which have an open neighbourhood VxV_{x} such that α|Vx=0\alpha|_{V_{x}}=0. Let Acp,q​(V)A_{c}^{p,q}(V) be the space of differential forms of bidegree (p,q)(p,q) with compact support in VV.

Proposition 5.6

Let (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) be a tropical chart of Xan{X^{\rm an}} and let α∈Ap,q​(V)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(V) be given by αU∈Ap,q​(tropU​(V))\alpha_{U}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U}(V)). Then α=0\alpha=0 in Ap,q​(V)A^{p,q}(V) if and only if αU=0\alpha_{U}=0 in Ap,q​(tropU​(V))A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U}(V)).

Proof: See [CD12], Lemme 3.2.2. □\square

Remark 5.7

It follows from Proposition 5.6, that tropU​(supp⁡(α))=supp⁡(αU){\rm trop}_{U}({\rm supp}(\alpha))={\rm supp}(\alpha_{U}) (see [CD12], Corollaire 3.2.3). Note however that not every differential form α\alpha on the tropical chart (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) is given by a single αU∈Ap,q​(tropU​(V))\alpha_{U}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U}(V)) as in Proposition 5.6.

5.8

In analogy with differential geometry on manifolds, we set C∞​(V):=A0,0​(V)C^{\infty}(V):=A^{0,0}(V) for any open subset VV of Xan{X^{\rm an}} and a smooth function on VV is just a differential form of bidegree (0,0)(0,0). Since tropicalization maps are continuous, it is clear that a smooth function is a continuous function on VV. By the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, the space Cc∞​(V)C_{c}^{\infty}(V) of smooth functions with compact support in VV is a dense subalgebra of Cc​(V)C_{c}(V) (see [CD12], Proposition 3.3.5).

Definition 5.9

Let (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} be an open covering of an open subset VV of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. A smooth partition of unity on VV with compact supports subordinated to the covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} is a family (ϕj)j∈J(\phi_{j})_{j\in J} of non-negative smooth functions with compact support on VV with the following properties:

  • (i)

    The family (supp⁡(ϕj))j∈J({\rm supp}(\phi_{j}))_{j\in J} is locally finite on VV.

  • (ii)

    We have ∑j∈Jϕj≡1\sum_{j\in J}\phi_{j}\equiv 1 on VV.

  • (iii)

    For every j∈Jj\in J, there is i⁡(j)∈Ii(j)\in I such that supp⁡(ϕj)⊂Vi⁡(j){\rm supp}(\phi_{j})\subset V_{i(j)}.

Proposition 5.10

Let (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} be an open covering of an open subset VV of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. Then there is a smooth partition of unity (ϕj)j∈J(\phi_{j})_{j\in J} on VV with compact supports subordinated to the covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I}.

Proof: It is enough to show that for every x∈Vx\in V, there is a non-negative smooth function ϕ\phi with compact support in VV and with ϕ⁡(x)>0\phi(x)>0. Since Xan{X^{\rm an}} is a locally compact Hausdorff space which is also σ\sigma-compact, the open subset VV is paracompact and hence standard arguments from differential geometry yield the existence of the desired partition of unity (see [Wa83], Theorem 1.11).

To prove the crucial claim at the beginning of the proof, we may assume that VV is coming from a tropical chart (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) (see Proposition 4.16). Then Ω:=tropU​(V)\Omega:={\rm trop}_{U}(V) is a open subset of Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) with tropU−1​(Ω)=V{\rm trop}_{U}^{-1}(\Omega)=V and hence there is an open subset Ω~\tilde{\Omega} in (NU)ℝ(N_{U})_{\mathbb{R}} with Ω=Ω~∩Trop⁡(U)\Omega=\tilde{\Omega}\cap{\rm Trop}(U). There is a smooth non-negative function ff on (NU)ℝ(N_{U})_{\mathbb{R}} with compact support in Ω~\tilde{\Omega} such that f​(tropU​(x))>0f({\rm trop}_{U}(x))>0. Since the tropicalization map is proper, the smooth function ϕ:=f∘tropU\phi:=f\circ{\rm trop}_{U} has compact support in VV and hence ϕ\phi fulfills the claim. □\square

So far, we have seen properties of differential forms which are completely similar to the archimedean case. The next result of Chambert-Loir and Ducros ([CD12], Lemme 3.2.5) shows that the support of a differential form of degree at least one is disjoint from X⁡(K)X(K).

Lemma 5.11

Let WW be an open subset of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. We consider x∈Wx\in W and α∈Ap,q​(W)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(W) with d⁡(x)<max⁡(p,q)d(x)<\max(p,q). Then x∉supp⁡(α)x\not\in{\rm supp}(\alpha).

Proof: Using Proposition 4.16 and shrinking the open neighbourhood WW of xx, we may assume that WW is a tropical chart (W,φU)(W,\varphi_{U}) on which α\alpha is given by the superform αU∈Ap,q​(tropU​(W))\alpha_{U}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U}(W)). By Proposition 4.14, there is a very affine open subset UxU_{x} of UU and a compact neighbourhood VxV_{x} of xx in (Ux)an(U_{x})^{\rm an} such that tropUx​(Vx){\rm trop}_{U_{x}}(V_{x}) is of dimension d⁡(x)d(x). By Proposition 4.16, there is a tropical chart (V′,φU′)(V^{\prime},\varphi_{U^{\prime}}) with x∈V′⊂Vxx\in V^{\prime}\subset V_{x} and U′⊂UxU^{\prime}\subset U_{x}. By 4.12, there is an affine homomorphism ψ:TU′→TU\psi:T_{U^{\prime}}\rightarrow T_{U} such that φU=φU′∘ψ\varphi_{U}=\varphi_{U^{\prime}}\circ\psi. Using the same factorization for the tropicalizations, we see that the restriction of α\alpha to V′V^{\prime} is given by Trop​(ψ)∗​(αU)∈Ap,q​(tropU′​(V′)){\rm Trop}(\psi)^{*}(\alpha_{U})\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U^{\prime}}(V^{\prime})). The inclusion Ux⊂UU_{x}\subset U yields that tropUx{\rm trop}_{U_{x}} factorizes through tropU{\rm trop}_{U} (use 4.12). Since V′⊂VxV^{\prime}\subset V_{x}, we get dim(tropU​(V′))≤dim(tropUx​(V′))≤d⁡(x)<max⁡(p,q)\dim({\rm trop}_{U}(V^{\prime}))\leq\dim({\rm trop}_{U_{x}}(V^{\prime}))\leq d(x)<\max(p,q). As tropU​(V′)=Trop⁡(ψ)​(tropU′​(V′)){\rm trop}_{U}(V^{\prime})={\rm Trop}(\psi)({\rm trop}_{U^{\prime}}(V^{\prime})), we conclude that Trop​(ψ)∗​(αU)=0{\rm Trop}(\psi)^{*}(\alpha_{U})=0. This proves α=0\alpha=0. □\square

Corollary 5.12

Let WW be an open subset of Xan{X^{\rm an}} and let UU be a Zariski open subset of XX. If α∈Ap,q​(W)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(W) with dim(X∖U)<max⁡(p,q)\dim(X\setminus U)<\max(p,q), then supp⁡(α)⊂W∩Uan{\rm supp}(\alpha)\subset W\cap{U^{\rm an}}.

Proof: Let x∈W∖Uanx\in W\setminus{U^{\rm an}}. Then 4.2 shows that d⁡(x)≤dim(X∖U)<max⁡(p,q)d(x)\leq\dim(X\setminus U)<\max(p,q). By Lemma 5.11, we get x∉supp⁡(α)x\not\in{\rm supp}(\alpha) proving the claim. □\square

Proposition 5.13

Let α∈Acp,q​(Xan)\alpha\in A^{p,q}_{c}({X^{\rm an}}) be a differential form with max⁡(p,q)=dim(X)\max(p,q)=\dim(X). Then there is a very affine open subset UU of XX such that supp⁡(α)⊂Uan{\rm supp}(\alpha)\subset{U^{\rm an}} and such that α\alpha is given on Uan{U^{\rm an}} by a superform αU∈Acp,q​(Trop⁡(U))\alpha_{U}\in A_{c}^{p,q}({\rm Trop}(U)).

Proof: By assumption, the support of α\alpha is a compact subset of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. We conclude that there are finitely many tropical charts (Vi,φUi)i=1,…,s(V_{i},\varphi_{U_{i}})_{i=1,\dots,s} covering supp⁡(α){\rm supp}(\alpha) such that α\alpha is given on ViV_{i} by the superform αi∈Ap,q​(tropUi​(Vi))\alpha_{i}\in A^{p,q}({\rm trop}_{U_{i}}(V_{i})). Recall that Ωi:=tropUi​(Vi)\Omega_{i}:={\rm trop}_{U_{i}}(V_{i}) is an open subset of Trop⁡(Ui){\rm Trop}(U_{i}). By 4.13, U:=U1∩⋯∩UsU:=U_{1}\cap\dots\cap U_{s} is a non-empty very affine open subset of XX. We define the open subset VV of Uan{U^{\rm an}} by V:=Uan∩⋃i=1sViV:={U^{\rm an}}\cap\bigcup_{i=1}^{s}V_{i}. Since max⁡(p,q)=dim(X)\max(p,q)=\dim(X), Corollary 5.12 yields supp⁡(α)⊂Uan{\rm supp}(\alpha)\subset{U^{\rm an}}. Using 4.12, we see that tropUi=Trop⁡(ψi)∘tropU{\rm trop}_{U_{i}}={\rm Trop}(\psi_{i})\circ{\rm trop}_{U} for an affine homomorphism ψi:TU→TUi\psi_{i}:T_{U}\rightarrow T_{U_{i}} of tori. Then we have

tropU​(Vi∩Uan)=(Trop⁡(ψi))−1​(Ωi)∩Trop⁡(U){\rm trop}_{U}(V_{i}\cap{U^{\rm an}})=({\rm Trop}(\psi_{i}))^{-1}(\Omega_{i})\cap{\rm Trop}(U)

and we denote this open subset of Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) by Ωi′\Omega_{i}^{\prime}. It follows that the preimage of Ω:=⋃i=1sΩi′\Omega:=\bigcup_{i=1}^{s}\Omega_{i}^{\prime} with respect to (φU)trop(\varphi_{U})_{\rm trop} is equal to VV. We conclude that (V,φU)(V,\varphi_{U}) is a tropical chart of Xan{X^{\rm an}}. Note that α\alpha is given on Uan∩Vi{U^{\rm an}}\cap V_{i} by αi′:=Trop​(ψi)∗​(αi)∈Ap,q​(Ωi′)\alpha_{i}^{\prime}:={\rm Trop}(\psi_{i})^{*}(\alpha_{i})\in A^{p,q}(\Omega_{i}^{\prime}). By Proposition 5.6, αi′\alpha_{i}^{\prime} agrees with αj′\alpha_{j}^{\prime} on Ωi′∩Ωj′\Omega_{i}^{\prime}\cap\Omega_{j}^{\prime} for every i,j∈{1,…,s}i,j\in\{1,\dots,s\} and hence they define a superform αU∈Ap,q​(Ω)\alpha_{U}\in A^{p,q}(\Omega). By construction, αU\alpha_{U} gives the differential form α\alpha on VV. It follows from Remark 5.7 that αU\alpha_{U} has compact support in Ω\Omega. Since α\alpha has compact support in VV, we conclude that αU\alpha_{U} is a superform on Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) which defines α\alpha on Uan{U^{\rm an}}. □\square

5.14

Let α∈Acn,n​(W)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n,n}(W) for an open subset WW of Xan{X^{\rm an}}, where n:=dim(X)n:=\dim(X). Obviously, we may view α\alpha as a (n,n)(n,n)-form on Xan{X^{\rm an}} with compact support. We call a very affine open subset UU as in Proposition 5.13 a very affine chart of integration for α\alpha. Then α\alpha is given by a superform αU∈Acn,n​(Trop⁡(U))\alpha_{U}\in A_{c}^{n,n}({\rm Trop}(U)). We define the integral of α\alpha over WW by

∫Wα:=∫Trop⁡(U)αU.\int_{W}\alpha:=\int_{{\rm Trop}(U)}\alpha_{U}.

Here, we view Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(U) as a tropical cycle (see 4.6) and we integrate as in 3.4.

Lemma 5.15

For α∈Acn,n​(W)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n,n}(W), the following properties hold:

  • (a)

    If UU is a very affine chart of integration for α\alpha, then every non-empty very affine open subset U′U^{\prime} of UU is a very affine chart of integration for α\alpha.

  • (b)

    The definition of ∫Wα\int_{W}\alpha is independent of the choice of the very affine chart of integration for α\alpha.

Proof: By Corollary 5.12, supp⁡(α)⊂(U′)an{\rm supp}(\alpha)\subset(U^{\prime})^{\rm an} and (a) follows. To prove (b), it is enough to show

∫Trop⁡(U)αU=∫Trop⁡(U′)αU′\int_{{\rm Trop}(U)}\alpha_{U}=\int_{{\rm Trop}(U^{\prime})}\alpha_{U^{\prime}} (3)

for a non-empty very affine open subset U′U^{\prime} of UU by using (a). The differential form α\alpha is given on Uan{U^{\rm an}} (resp. (U′)an(U^{\prime})^{\rm an}) by αU∈Acn,n​(Trop⁡(U))\alpha_{U}\in A^{n,n}_{c}({\rm Trop}(U)) (resp. αU′∈Acn,n​(Trop⁡(U′))\alpha_{U^{\prime}}\in A^{n,n}_{c}({\rm Trop}(U^{\prime}))). By 4.12, there is an affine homomorphism ψ:TU′→TU\psi:T_{U^{\prime}}\rightarrow T_{U} of the underlying canonical tori such that φU=Trop⁡(ψ)∘φU′\varphi_{U}={\rm Trop}(\psi)\circ\varphi_{U^{\prime}}. It follows that α\alpha is given on U′U^{\prime} also by Trop​(ψ)∗​(αU){\rm Trop}(\psi)^{*}(\alpha_{U}). By Proposition 5.6, we have αU′=Trop​(ψ)∗​(αU)\alpha_{U^{\prime}}={\rm Trop}(\psi)^{*}(\alpha_{U}). The Sturmfels–Tevelev multiplicity formula shows that Trop​(ψ)∗​(Trop⁡(U′))=Trop⁡(U){\rm Trop}(\psi)_{*}({\rm Trop}(U^{\prime}))={\rm Trop}(U) (see Proposition 4.11). Then Proposition 3.10 shows that (3) holds. □\square

Proposition 5.16

Let λ,ρ∈ℝ\lambda,\rho\in{\mathbb{R}} and let α,β∈Acn,n​(W)\alpha,\beta\in A_{c}^{n,n}(W). Then we have

∫Wλ​α+ρ​β=λ​∫Wα+ρ​∫Wβ.\int_{W}\lambda\alpha+\rho\beta=\lambda\int_{W}\alpha+\rho\int_{W}\beta.

Proof: By Lemma 5.15, we may choose a simultaneous very affine chart of integration for both α\alpha and β\beta. Then the claim follows by the corresponding property of the integration of superforms. □\square

We have also Stokes’ theorem for differential forms on the open subset WW of Xan{X^{\rm an}}:

Theorem 5.17

For n:=dim(X)n:=\dim(X) and α∈Ac2​n−1​(W)\alpha\in A_{c}^{2n-1}(W), we have ∫W𝑑α=0\int_{W}d\alpha=0 and hence ∫Wd′​α=∫Wd′′​α=0\int_{W}d^{\prime}\alpha=\int_{W}d^{\prime\prime}\alpha=0.

Proof: By Proposition 5.13, there is a very affine open subset UU of XX such that supp⁡(α)⊂Uan{\rm supp}(\alpha)\subset{U^{\rm an}} and such that α\alpha is given on Uan{U^{\rm an}} by a superform αU∈Ac2​n−1​(Trop⁡(U))\alpha_{U}\in A^{2n-1}_{c}({\rm Trop}(U)). Then UU is a very affine chart of integration for d′​αd^{\prime}\alpha and d′′​αd^{\prime\prime}\alpha and the claim follows from Proposition 3.5. □\square

Remark 5.18

Integration of differential forms on complex manifolds is defined by using a partition of unity with compact supports subordinated to a covering by holomorphic charts. Surprisingly, this was not necessary in our non-archimedean algebraic setting as we have defined integration by using a single suitable tropical chart. In fact, the use of a smooth partition of unity (ϕj)j∈J(\phi_{j})_{j\in J} with compact supports subordinate to an open covering of WW by tropical charts (Vi,φUi)i∈I(V_{i},\varphi_{U_{i}})_{i\in I} would not work here directly. To illustrate this, suppose that α∈Acn,n​(W)\alpha\in A^{n,n}_{c}(W) is given on ViV_{i} by αi∈An,n​(tropUi​(Vi))\alpha_{i}\in A^{n,n}({\rm trop}_{U_{i}}(V_{i})). If the functions ϕj\phi_{j} are of the form ϕj=fj∘tropUi⁡(j)\phi_{j}=f_{j}\circ{\rm trop}_{U_{i(j)}} for some Vi⁡(j)⊃supp⁡(ϕj)V_{i(j)}\supset{\rm supp}(\phi_{j}) and fj∈Cc∞​(tropUi⁡(j)​(Vi⁡(j)))f_{j}\in C^{\infty}_{c}({\rm trop}_{U_{i(j)}}(V_{i(j)})), then we could set ∫Wα=∑j∈J∫Trop⁡(Ui⁡(j))fj​αi⁡(j)\int_{W}\alpha=\sum_{j\in J}\int_{{\rm Trop}(U_{i(j)})}f_{j}\alpha_{i(j)}. However, the functions ϕj\phi_{j} could not be expected to have this form and so this approach fails.

Chambert-Loir and Ducros define integration more generally for differential forms on paracompact good analytic spaces (see [CD12], §3.8). The idea is to use a covering by the interiors of affinoid subdomains. Then there is a smooth partition of unity with supports subordinated to this covering which reduces the problem to defining integration over an affinoid subdomain. But in the affinoid case, one can find a single tropical chart of integration similarly as in Proposition 5.13. It follows from Remark 7.6 and Proposition 7.11 that both definitions give the same integral on the analytification of an algebraic variety.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.