ScalingStacks

2 Superforms and supercurrents on ℝ r [034Q]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2 Superforms and supercurrents on ℝr{\mathbb{R}}^{r}

In this section, we recall the construction of superforms and supercurrents introduced by Lagerberg (see [La12], §2). They are real analogues of complex (p,q)(p,q)-forms or currents on ℂr{\mathbb{C}}^{r}. So let us first recall briefly the definitions in complex analytic geometry. On ℂr{\mathbb{C}}^{r}, we have the holomorphic coordinates z1,…,zrz_{1},\dots,z_{r}. A (p,q)(p,q)-form α\alpha is given by

α=∑I,JαI​J​d​zI∧d​z¯J,\alpha=\sum_{I,J}\alpha_{IJ}dz_{I}\wedge d\overline{z}_{J},

where II (resp. JJ) ranges over all subsets of {1,…,r}\{1,\dots,r\} of cardinality pp (resp. qq) and where the αI​J\alpha_{IJ} are smooth functions. Here, use the convenient notation d​zI:=d​zi1∧⋯∧d​zipdz_{I}:=dz_{i_{1}}\wedge\cdots\wedge dz_{i_{p}} and d​z¯J:=d​z¯j1∧⋯∧d​z¯jqd\overline{z}_{J}:=d\overline{z}_{j_{1}}\wedge\cdots\wedge d\overline{z}_{j_{q}} for the elements i1<⋯<ipi_{1}<\dots<i_{p} of II and j1<⋯<jqj_{1}<\dots<j_{q} of JJ. We have linear differential operators d′d^{\prime}, d′′d^{\prime\prime} and d=d′+d′′d=d^{\prime}+d^{\prime\prime} on differential forms which are determined by the rules

d′​f=∑i=1r∂f∂zi​d​zi,d′′​f=∑j=1r∂f∂z¯j​d​z¯jd^{\prime}f=\sum_{i=1}^{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial z_{i}}dz_{i},\quad d^{\prime\prime}f=\sum_{j=1}^{r}\frac{\partial f}{\partial\overline{z}_{j}}d\overline{z}_{j}

for smooth complex functions ff on ℂr{\mathbb{C}}^{r}. Very often, these differential operators are denoted by ∂:=d′{\partial}:=d^{\prime} and ∂¯:=d′′{\bar{\partial}}:=d^{\prime\prime}. A current is a continuous linear functional on the space of differential forms on ℂr{\mathbb{C}}^{r}. Continuity is with respect to uniform convergence of finitely many derivatives on compact subsets. Differential forms may be viewed as currents using integration and the differential operators d,d′,d′′d,d^{\prime},d^{\prime\prime} extend to currents. For details, we refer to [De12], Chapter I, or to [GH78].

The goal of this section is to give a real analogue in the following setting: Let NN be a free abelian group of rank rr with dual abelian group M:=Hom⁡(N,ℤ)M:={\rm Hom}(N,{\mathbb{Z}}). For convenience, we choose a basis e1,…,ere_{1},\dots,e_{r} of NN leading to coordinates x1,…,xrx_{1},\dots,x_{r} on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Our constructions will depend only on the underlying real affine structure and the integration at the end will depend on the underlying integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine structure, but not on the choice of the coordinates. Here, an integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine space is a real affine space whose underlying real vector space has an integral structure, i.e. it comes with a complete lattice. The definition of the integrals in [CD12] does use calibrations which makes the integrals in some sense unnatural. In the case of an underlying canonical integral structure (which is the case for tropicalizations), there is a canonical calibration (as in [CD12], §3.5) and both definitions of the integrals are the same.

2.1

Let Ak​(U,ℝ)A^{k}(U,{\mathbb{R}}) be the space of smooth real differential forms on an open subset UU of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}, then a superform of bidegree (p,q)(p,q) on UU is an element of

Ap,q(U):=Ap(U,ℝ)⊗C∞​(U)Aq(U,ℝ)=C∞(U)⊗ℤΛpM⊗ℤΛqM.A^{p,q}(U):=A^{p}(U,{\mathbb{R}})\otimes_{C^{\infty}(U)}A^{q}(U,{\mathbb{R}})=C^{\infty}(U)\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\Lambda^{p}M\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\Lambda^{q}M.

Formally, such a superform α\alpha may be written as

α=∑|I|=p,|J|=qαI​J​d′​xI∧d′′​xJ\alpha=\sum_{|I|=p,|J|=q}\alpha_{IJ}d^{\prime}x_{I}\wedge{d^{\prime\prime}x_{J}}

where II (resp. JJ) consists of i1<⋯<ipi_{1}<\dots<i_{p} (resp. j1<⋯<jqj_{1}<\dots<j_{q}), αI​J∈C∞​(U)\alpha_{IJ}\in C^{\infty}(U) and

d′​xI∧d′′​xJ:=(d​xi1∧⋯∧d​xip)⊗(d​xj1∧⋯∧d​xjq).d^{\prime}x_{I}\wedge{d^{\prime\prime}x_{J}}:=(dx_{i_{1}}\wedge\dots\wedge dx_{i_{p}})\otimes(dx_{j_{1}}\wedge\dots\wedge dx_{j_{q}}).

The wedge product is defined in the usual way on the space of superforms A(U):=⊕p,q≤nAp,q(U)A(U):=\oplus_{p,q\leq n}A^{p,q}(U). There is a canonical C∞​(U)C^{\infty}(U)-linear isomorphism Jp,q:Ap,q​(U)→Aq,p​(U)J^{p,q}:A^{p,q}(U)\rightarrow A^{q,p}(U) obtained by switching factors in the tensor product. The inverse of Jp,qJ^{p,q} is Jq,pJ^{q,p}. We call α∈Ap,p​(U)\alpha\in A^{p,p}(U) symmetric if Jp,p​α=αJ^{p,p}\alpha=\alpha.

2.2

There is a differential operator d′:Ap,q​(U)→Ap+1,q​(U)d^{\prime}:A^{p,q}(U)\rightarrow A^{p+1,q}(U) given by

d′​α:=∑|I|=p,|J|=q∑i=1r∂αI​J∂xi​d′​xi∧d′​xI∧d′′​xJ.d^{\prime}\alpha:=\sum_{|I|=p,|J|=q}\sum_{i=1}^{r}\frac{\partial\alpha_{IJ}}{\partial x_{i}}d^{\prime}x_{i}\wedge d^{\prime}x_{I}\wedge{d^{\prime\prime}x_{J}}.

This does not depend on the choice of coordinates as d′=d⊗idd^{\prime}=d\otimes{\rm id} on Ap,q​(U)=Ap​(U,ℝ)⊗ℤΛq​MA^{p,q}(U)=A^{p}(U,{\mathbb{R}})\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\Lambda^{q}M is an intrinsic characterization using the classical differential dd on the space Ap​(U,ℝ)A^{p}(U,{\mathbb{R}}) of real smooth pp-forms. Similarly, we define a differential operator d′′:Ap,q​(U)→Ap,q+1​(U)d^{\prime\prime}:A^{p,q}(U)\rightarrow A^{p,q+1}(U) by

d′′​α:=∑|I|=p,|J|=q∑j=1r∂αI​J∂xj​d′′​xj∧d′​xI∧d′′​xJ.d^{\prime\prime}\alpha:=\sum_{|I|=p,|J|=q}\sum_{j=1}^{r}\frac{\partial\alpha_{IJ}}{\partial x_{j}}{d^{\prime\prime}x_{j}}\wedge d^{\prime}x_{I}\wedge{d^{\prime\prime}x_{J}}.

By linearity, we extend these differential operators to A⁡(U)A(U). Moreover, we set d:=d′+d′′d:=d^{\prime}+d^{\prime\prime}.

2.3

If N′N^{\prime} is a free abelian group of rank r′r^{\prime} and if F:Nℝ′→NℝF:N^{\prime}_{\mathbb{R}}\rightarrow N_{\mathbb{R}} is an affine map with F⁡(V)⊂UF(V)\subset U for an open subset VV of Nℝ′N^{\prime}_{\mathbb{R}}, then we have a well-defined pull-back F∗:Ap,q​(U)→Ap,q​(V)F^{*}:A^{p,q}(U)\rightarrow A^{p,q}(V) given as usual. The affine pull-back commutes with the differential operators dd, d′d^{\prime} and d′′d^{\prime\prime}.

2.4

Let Ac​(U)A_{c}(U) denote the space of superforms on UU with compact support in UU. For α∈Ac​(U)\alpha\in A_{c}(U), we define

∫Uα:=∫UαL​L​d​x1∧⋯∧d​xr\int_{U}\alpha:=\int_{U}\alpha_{LL}dx_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge dx_{r}

with L={1,…,r}L=\{1,\dots,r\} and the usual integration of rr-forms with respect to the orientation induced by the choice of coordinates on the right hand side. If FF is an affine map as in 2.3 and if r=r′r=r^{\prime}, then we have the transformation formula

∫VF∗​(α)=|det(F)|​∫Uα\int_{V}F^{*}(\alpha)=|\det(F)|\int_{U}\alpha (1)

(see [La12], equation (2.3)). We conclude that the definition of the integral depends only on the underlying integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine structure of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}.

2.5

Now let σ\sigma be a polyhedron of dimension nn in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. By definition, σ\sigma is the intersection of finitely many halfspaces Hi:={ω∈Nℝ∣⟨ui,ω⟩≤ci}H_{i}:=\{\omega\in N_{\mathbb{R}}\mid\langle u_{i},\omega\rangle\leq c_{i}\} with ui∈Mℝu_{i}\in M_{\mathbb{R}} and ci∈ℝc_{i}\in{\mathbb{R}}. A polytope is a bounded polyhedron. We say that σ\sigma is an integral GG-affine polyhedron for a subgroup GG of ℝ{\mathbb{R}} if we may choose all ui∈Mu_{i}\in M and all ci∈Gc_{i}\in G. In this case, we have a canonical integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine structure on the affine space 𝔸σ{\mathbb{A}}_{\sigma} generated by σ\sigma. If 𝕃σ{\mathbb{L}}_{\sigma} is the underlying real vector space of 𝔸σ{\mathbb{A}}_{\sigma}, then this integral structure is given by the lattice Nσ:=𝕃σ∩NN_{\sigma}:={\mathbb{L}}_{\sigma}\cap N. Using 2.3 and the above, we get a well-defined integral ∫σα\int_{\sigma}\alpha for any α∈Acn,n​(U)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n,n}(U), where UU is an open neighbourhood of σ\sigma.

2.6

In [CD12], integration is described in terms of a contraction: Similarly as in differential geometry, we may view a superform α∈Ap,q​(U)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(U) as a multilinear map

Nℝp+q⟶C∞​(U),(n1,…,np+q)↦α⁡(n1,…,np+q)N_{\mathbb{R}}^{p+q}\longrightarrow C^{\infty}(U),\quad(n_{1},\dots,n_{p+q})\mapsto\alpha(n_{1},\dots,n_{p+q})

which is alternating in the variables (n1,…,np)(n_{1},\dots,n_{p}) and also in (np+1,…,np+q)(n_{p+1},\dots,n_{p+q}). Let I⊂{1,…,p+q}I\subset\{1,\dots,p+q\} be a subset of cardinality ss with s′s^{\prime} elements contained in {1,…,p}\{1,\dots,p\} and hence s′′=s−s′s^{\prime\prime}=s-s^{\prime} elements in {p+1,…,p+q}\{p+1,\dots,p+q\}. Given vectors v1,…,vs∈Nℝv_{1},\dots,v_{s}\in N_{\mathbb{R}}, the contraction ⟨α;v1,…,vs⟩I∈Ap−s′,q−s′′​(U)\langle\alpha;v_{1},\dots,v_{s}\rangle_{I}\in A^{p-s^{\prime},q-s^{\prime\prime}}(U) is given by inserting v1,…,vsv_{1},\dots,v_{s} for the variables (ni)i∈I(n_{i})_{i\in I} of the above multilinear function.

Using the basis e1,…,ere_{1},\dots,e_{r} of NN and assuming α∈Acr,r​(U)\alpha\in A_{c}^{r,r}(U), the contraction ⟨α;e1,…,er⟩{r+1,…,2​r}\langle\alpha;e_{1},\dots,e_{r}\rangle_{\{r+1,\dots,2r\}} is a (r,0)(r,0)-superform which may be viewed as a classical rr-form on UU. Then it is immediately clear from the definitions that we have

∫Uα=∫U⟨α;e1,…,er⟩{r+1,…,2​r}\int_{U}\alpha=\int_{U}\langle\alpha;e_{1},\dots,e_{r}\rangle_{\{r+1,\dots,2r\}}

where we use the usual integration of rr-forms on the right. Of course, there is no preference to contract with respect to the last rr variables. Similarly, may view ⟨α;e1,…,er⟩{1,…,r}∈Ac0,r​(U)\langle\alpha;e_{1},\dots,e_{r}\rangle_{\{1,\dots,r\}}\in A_{c}^{0,r}(U) as a classical rr-form and we have

∫Uα=∫U⟨α;e1,…,er⟩{1,…,r}.\int_{U}\alpha=\int_{U}\langle\alpha;e_{1},\dots,e_{r}\rangle_{\{1,\dots,r\}}.

Next, we are looking for an analogue of Stokes’ theorem for superforms.

2.7

Let HH be an integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine halfspace in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. This means that H={ω∈Nℝ∣⟨u,ω⟩≤c}H=\{\omega\in N_{\mathbb{R}}\mid\langle u,\omega\rangle\leq c\} for some u∈Mu\in M and c∈ℝc\in{\mathbb{R}}. Using a translation, we may assume that c=0c=0 and hence the boundary ∂H\partial H is a linear subspace of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Let [ω∂H,H][\omega_{\partial H,H}] be the generator of N/(N∩∂H)≅ℤN/(N\cap\partial H)\cong{\mathbb{Z}} which points outwards, i.e. there is u∂H,H∈Mu_{\partial H,H}\in M such that u∂H,H​(H)≤0u_{\partial H,H}(H)\leq 0 and u∂H,H​(ω∂H,H)=1u_{\partial H,H}(\omega_{\partial H,H})=1. We choose a representative ω∂H,H∈N\omega_{\partial H,H}\in N and we note also that u∂H,Hu_{\partial H,H} is uniquely determined by the above properties.

2.8

Let UU be an open subset of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} and let σ\sigma be an rr-dimensional integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedron contained in UU. For any closed face ρ\rho of codimension 11, let ωρ,σ:=ω∂H,H\omega_{\rho,\sigma}:=\omega_{\partial H,H} using 2.7 for the affine hyperplane ∂H\partial H generated by ρ\rho and the corresponding halfspace containing σ\sigma. We note that ωρ,σ∈N\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\in N is determined up to addition with elements in Nρ=N∩𝕃ρN_{\rho}=N\cap{\mathbb{L}}_{\rho}, where 𝕃ρ{\mathbb{L}}_{\rho} is the linear hyperplane parallel to ρ\rho.

For η∈Acr−1,r​(U)\eta\in A_{c}^{r-1,r}(U), we have introduced the contraction ⟨η;ωρ,σ⟩{r}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{r\}} as an element of Acr−1,r−1​(U)A_{c}^{r-1,r-1}(U) which is obtained by inserting the vector ωρ,σ\omega_{\rho,\sigma} for the rr-th argument of the corresponding multilinear function (see 2.6). Note that the restriction of this contraction to ρ\rho does not depend on the choice of the representative ωρ,σ\omega_{\rho,\sigma}. Then we define

∫∂ση:=∑ρ∫ρ⟨η;ωρ,σ⟩{r},\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta:=\sum_{\rho}\int_{\rho}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{r\}},

where ρ\rho ranges over all closed faces of σ\sigma of codimension 11. On the right, we use the integrals of (r−1,r−1)(r-1,r-1)-superforms from 2.4. For η∈Acr,r−1​(U)\eta\in A_{c}^{r,r-1}(U), we define similarly

∫∂ση:=∑ρ∫ρ⟨η;ωρ,σ⟩{1}.\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta:=\sum_{\rho}\int_{\rho}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{1\}}.

Note that the integrals do depend only on the integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine structure of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} but do not depend on the choice of the orientation of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}.

If σ\sigma is an integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedron of any dimension nn and if η∈Acn−1,n​(U)\eta\in A_{c}^{n-1,n}(U) for an open subset UU of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} containing σ\sigma, then we define ∫∂ση\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta by applying the above to the affine space 𝔸σ{\mathbb{A}}_{\sigma} generated by σ\sigma and to the pull-back of η\eta to 𝔸σ{\mathbb{A}}_{\sigma}. We give now a concrete description of ∫∂ση\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta in terms of integrals over classical n−1n-1-forms. For every closed face ρ\rho of σ\sigma, let Nσ=𝕃σ∩NN_{\sigma}={\mathbb{L}}_{\sigma}\cap N be the canonical integral structure on the affine space generated by σ\sigma. If e1ρ,…,en−1ρe_{1}^{\rho},\dots,e_{n-1}^{\rho} is a basis of NρN_{\rho}, then ωρ,σ,e1ρ,…,en−1ρ\omega_{\rho,\sigma},e_{1}^{\rho},\dots,e_{n-1}^{\rho} is a basis of NσN_{\sigma}. We note that the contraction ⟨η;ωρ,σ,e1ρ,…,en−1ρ⟩{n,…,2​n−1}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma},e_{1}^{\rho},\dots,e_{n-1}^{\rho}\rangle_{\{n,\dots,2n-1\}} may be viewed as a classical (n−1)(n-1)-form on UU and hence we get

∫∂ση=∑ρ∫ρ⟨η;ωρ,σ⟩{n}=∑ρ∫ρ⟨η;ωρ,σ,e1ρ,…,en−1ρ⟩{n,…,2​n−1}.\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta=\sum_{\rho}\int_{\rho}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{n\}}=\sum_{\rho}\int_{\rho}\langle\eta;\omega_{\rho,\sigma},e_{1}^{\rho},\dots,e_{n-1}^{\rho}\rangle_{\{n,\dots,2n-1\}}.
Proposition 2.9 (Stokes’ formula)

Let σ\sigma be an nn-dimensional integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedron contained in the open subset UU of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. For any η′∈Acn−1,n​(U)\eta^{\prime}\in A_{c}^{n-1,n}(U) and any η′′∈Acn,n−1​(U)\eta^{\prime\prime}\in A_{c}^{n,n-1}(U), we have

∫σd′​η′=∫∂ση′,∫σd′′​η′′=∫∂ση′.\int_{\sigma}d^{\prime}\eta^{\prime}=\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta^{\prime},\quad\int_{\sigma}d^{\prime\prime}\eta^{\prime\prime}=\int_{\partial\sigma}\eta^{\prime}.

Proof: This is just a reformulation of [La12], Proposition 2.3, in the case of a polyhedron using the formalism introduced above. In the quoted result, the boundary was assumed to be smooth, but as the classical Stokes’ formula holds also for polyhedra (see [Wa83], 4.7), this applies here as well. □\square

Proposition 2.10 (Green’s formula)

We consider a nn-dimensional integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedron σ\sigma contained in the open subset UU of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Assume that α∈Ap,p​(U)\alpha\in A^{p,p}(U) and β∈Aq,q​(U)\beta\in A^{q,q}(U) are symmetric with p+q=n−1p+q=n-1 and that the intersection of the supports of α\alpha and β\beta is compact. Then we have

∫σα∧d′​d′′​β−β∧d′​d′′​α=∫∂σα∧d′′​β−β∧d′′​α.\int_{\sigma}\alpha\wedge d^{\prime}d^{\prime\prime}\beta-\beta\wedge d^{\prime}d^{\prime\prime}\alpha=\int_{\partial\sigma}\alpha\wedge d^{\prime\prime}\beta-\beta\wedge d^{\prime\prime}\alpha.

Proof: This follows from Stokes’ formula as in [CD12], Lemma 1.3.8. □\square

2.11

A supercurrent on UU is a continuous linear functional on Acp,q​(U)A_{c}^{p,q}(U) where the latter is a locally convex vector space in a similar way as in the classical case. We denote the space of such supercurrents by Dp,q​(U)D_{p,q}(U). As usual, we define the linear differential operators dd, d′d^{\prime} and d′′d^{\prime\prime} on D⁡(U):=⨁p,qDp,q​(U)D(U):=\bigoplus_{p,q}D_{p,q}(U) by using (−1)p+q+1(-1)^{p+q+1} times the dual of the corresponding differential operator on Acp,q​(U)A_{c}^{p,q}(U). The sign is chosen in such a way that the canonical embedding Ap,q​(U)→Dr−p,r−q​(U)A^{p,q}(U)\rightarrow D_{r-p,r-q}(U) is compatible with the operators dd, d′d^{\prime} and d′′d^{\prime\prime}. Here, α∈Ap,q​(U)\alpha\in A^{p,q}(U) is mapped to [α]∈Dr−p,r−q​(U)[\alpha]\in D_{r-p,r-q}(U) given by [α]​(β)=∫Nℝα∧β[\alpha](\beta)=\int_{N_{\mathbb{R}}}\alpha\wedge\beta for any β∈Acr−p,r−q​(U)\beta\in A_{c}^{r-p,r-q}(U).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.