ScalingStacks

3 Superforms on polyhedral complexes [0354]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

3 Superforms on polyhedral complexes

We keep the notions from the previous section and we will extend them to the setting of polyhedral complexes. We will introduce tropical cycles and we will characterize them as closed currents of integrations over weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complexes.

3.1

A polyhedral complex π’ž{\mathscr{C}} in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} is a finite set of polyhedra with the following two properties: Every polyhedron in π’ž{\mathscr{C}} has all its closed faces in π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. If Ξ”,Οƒβˆˆπ’ž\Delta,\sigma\in{{\mathscr{C}}}, then Ξ”βˆ©Οƒ\Delta\cap\sigma is a closed face of Ξ”\Delta and Οƒ\sigma. Note here that the empty set and also Οƒ\sigma are allowed as closed faces of a polyhedron Οƒ\sigma (see [Gu12], Appendix A, for details).

A polyhedral complex π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is called integral GG-affine for a subgroup GG of ℝ{\mathbb{R}} if every polyhedron of π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is integral GG-affine. The support |π’ž||{\mathscr{C}}| of π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is the union of all polyhedra in π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. The polyhedral complex π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is called pure dimensional of dimension nn if every maximal polyhedron in π’ž{\mathscr{C}} has dimension nn. We will often use the notation π’žk:={Οƒβˆˆπ’žβˆ£dim(Οƒ)=k}{\mathscr{C}}_{k}:=\{\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}}\mid\dim(\sigma)=k\} for kβˆˆβ„•k\in{\mathbb{N}}.

3.2

Let π’ž{\mathscr{C}} be a polyhedral complex in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. A superform on π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is the restriction of a superform on (an open subset of) NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} to |π’ž||{\mathscr{C}}|. This means that two superforms agree if their restrictions to any polyhedron of |π’ž||{\mathscr{C}}| agree. Let A⁑(π’ž)A({\mathscr{C}}) be the space of superforms on π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. It is an alternating algebra with respect to the induced wedge product. We have also differential operators dd, dβ€²d^{\prime} and dβ€²β€²d^{\prime\prime} on A⁑(π’ž)A({\mathscr{C}}) given by restriction of the corresponding operators on A⁑(Nℝ)A(N_{\mathbb{R}}). Let Ap,q​(π’ž)A^{p,q}({\mathscr{C}}) be the space of (p,q)(p,q)-superforms on π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. The support of α∈A⁑(π’ž)\alpha\in A({\mathscr{C}}) is the complement of {Ο‰βˆˆ|π’ž|∣α vanishes identically in a neighbourhood ofΒ Ο‰}\{\omega\in|{\mathscr{C}}|\mid\text{$\alpha$ vanishes identically in a neighbourhood of $\omega$}\} in |π’ž||{\mathscr{C}}|. We denote by Acp,q​(π’ž)A_{c}^{p,q}({\mathscr{C}}) the subspace of Ap,q​(π’ž)A^{p,q}({\mathscr{C}}) of superforms of compact support.

Let Nβ€²N^{\prime} be a free abelian group of rank rβ€²r^{\prime} and let F:Nℝ′→NℝF:N^{\prime}_{\mathbb{R}}\rightarrow N_{\mathbb{R}} be an affine map. Suppose that π’žβ€²{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime} is a polyhedral complex of Nℝ′N^{\prime}_{\mathbb{R}} with F⁑(|π’žβ€²|)βŠ‚|π’ž|F(|{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}|)\subset|{\mathscr{C}}|, then the pull-back in 2.3 induces a pull-back Fβˆ—:Ap,q​(π’ž)β†’Ap,q​(π’žβ€²)F^{*}:A^{p,q}({\mathscr{C}})\rightarrow A^{p,q}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}).

3.3

A polyhedral complex π’Ÿ{\mathscr{D}} subdivides the polyhedral complex π’ž{\mathscr{C}} if they have the same support and if every polyhedron Ξ”\Delta of π’Ÿ{\mathscr{D}} is contained in a polyhedron of π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. In this case, we say that π’Ÿ{\mathscr{D}} is a subdivision of π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. All our constructions here will be compatible with subdivisions. This is no problem for the definition of superforms on π’ž{\mathscr{C}} as they depend only on the support |π’ž||{\mathscr{C}}|.

A weight on a pure dimensional polyhedral complex π’ž{\mathscr{C}} is a function mm which assigns to every maximal polyhedron Οƒβˆˆπ’ž\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}} a number mΟƒβˆˆβ„€m_{\sigma}\in{\mathbb{Z}}. Then we get a canonical weight on every subdivision of π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. For a weighted polyhedral complex (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m), only the polyhedra Ξ”βˆˆπ’ž\Delta\in{\mathscr{C}} which are contained in a maximal dimensional Οƒβˆˆπ’ž\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}} with mΟƒβ‰ 0m_{\sigma}\neq 0 are of interest. They form a subcomplex π’Ÿ{\mathscr{D}} of π’ž{\mathscr{C}} and we define the support of (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) as the support of π’Ÿ{\mathscr{D}}. The polyhedra of π’žβˆ–π’Ÿ{\mathscr{C}}\setminus{\mathscr{D}} will usually be neglected.

3.4

Let (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) be a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension nn. For α∈Acn,n​(π’ž)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n,n}({\mathscr{C}}), we set

∫(π’ž,m)Ξ±:=βˆ‘Οƒβˆˆπ’žnmΟƒβ€‹βˆ«ΟƒΞ±,\int_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}\alpha:=\sum_{\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}}_{n}}m_{\sigma}\int_{\sigma}\alpha,

where we use integration from 2.4 on the right. We define integrals over the boundary of π’ž{\mathscr{C}} for a superform Ξ²\beta in Acnβˆ’1,n​(π’ž)A_{c}^{n-1,n}({\mathscr{C}}) or in Acn,nβˆ’1​(π’ž)A_{c}^{n,n-1}({\mathscr{C}}) by

βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ²=βˆ‘Οƒβˆˆπ’žnmΟƒβ€‹βˆ«βˆ‚ΟƒΞ²,\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\beta=\sum_{\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}}_{n}}m_{\sigma}\int_{\partial\sigma}\beta,

where we use the boundary integrals from 2.8 on the right. Note that the boundary βˆ‚π’ž\partial{\mathscr{C}} may be defined as the subcomplex consisting of the polyhedra of dimension at most nβˆ’1n-1, but there is no canonical weight on βˆ‚π’ž\partial{\mathscr{C}}. Indeed, the boundary integral βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ²\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\beta depends on the relative situation βˆ‚π’žβŠ‚π’ž\partial{\mathscr{C}}\subset{\mathscr{C}} because of the weight mΟƒm_{\sigma} and the contraction with respect to the vectors ωρ,Οƒ\omega_{\rho,\sigma} used in the definitions. This is similar to the situation in real analysis where boundary integrals depend on the relative orientation. These classical boundary integrals do depend only on the restriction of the differential form to the boundary which is clearly wrong for our boundary integrals. However, it is still true that βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ²=0\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\beta=0 if the support of Ξ²\beta is disjoint from βˆ‚π’ž\partial{\mathscr{C}}.

Proposition 3.5 (Stokes’ formula)

Let (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) be a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension nn. For any Ξ·β€²βˆˆAcnβˆ’1,n​(π’ž)\eta^{\prime}\in A_{c}^{n-1,n}({\mathscr{C}}) and any Ξ·β€²β€²βˆˆAcn,nβˆ’1​(π’ž)\eta^{\prime\prime}\in A_{c}^{n,n-1}({\mathscr{C}}), we have

∫(π’ž,m)d′​η′=βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ·β€²,∫(π’ž,m)d′′​η′′=βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ·β€².\int_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}d^{\prime}\eta^{\prime}=\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\eta^{\prime},\quad\int_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}d^{\prime\prime}\eta^{\prime\prime}=\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\eta^{\prime}.

Proof: This follows immediately from Stokes’ formula for polyhedra given in Proposition 2.9. β–‘\square

Example 3.6

If (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) is a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension nn, then we get a supercurrent Ξ΄(π’ž,m)∈Dn,n​(Nℝ)\delta_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}\in D_{n,n}(N_{\mathbb{R}}) by setting Ξ΄(π’ž,m)​(Ξ·)=∫(π’ž,m)Ξ·\delta_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}(\eta)=\int_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}\eta for any η∈Acn,n​(Nℝ)\eta\in A_{c}^{n,n}(N_{\mathbb{R}}).

3.7

A weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) of pure dimension nn is called a tropical cycle if its weight mm satisfies the following balancing condition: For every nβˆ’1n-1-dimensional Οβˆˆπ’ž\rho\in{\mathscr{C}}, we have

βˆ‘Οƒβˆˆπ’žn,ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,ΟƒβˆˆNρ.\sum_{\sigma\in{\mathscr{C}}_{n},\,\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\in N_{\rho}.

Here, NρN_{\rho} is the canonical lattice contained in the affine space generated by ρ\rho and ωρ,ΟƒβˆˆNΟƒ\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\in N_{\sigma} is the lattice vector pointing outwards of Οƒ\sigma (see 2.8). Tropical cycles are the basic objects in tropical geometry.

Proposition 3.8

Let (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) be a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension nn on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  • (a)

    (π’ž,m)({\mathscr{C}},m) is a tropical cycle;

  • (b)

    Ξ΄(π’ž,m)\delta_{({\mathscr{C}},m)} is a dβ€²d^{\prime}-closed supercurrent on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}};

  • (c)

    Ξ΄(π’ž,m)\delta_{({\mathscr{C}},m)} is a dβ€²β€²d^{\prime\prime}-closed supercurrent on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}.

Proof: Let α∈Acnβˆ’1,n​(Nℝ)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n-1,n}(N_{\mathbb{R}}). By Stokes’ formula in Proposition 3.5, we have

Ξ΄(π’ž,m)​(d′​α)=βˆ«βˆ‚(π’ž,m)Ξ±=βˆ‘ΟƒmΟƒβ€‹βˆ‘ΟβŠ‚Οƒβˆ«ΟβŸ¨Ξ±;ωρ,ΟƒβŸ©{n}=βˆ‘Οβˆ«ΟβŸ¨Ξ±;βˆ‘ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,ΟƒβŸ©{n},\delta_{({\mathscr{C}},m)}(d^{\prime}\alpha)=\int_{\partial({\mathscr{C}},m)}\alpha=\sum_{\sigma}m_{\sigma}\sum_{\rho\subset\sigma}\int_{\rho}\langle\alpha;\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{n\}}=\sum_{\rho}\int_{\rho}\langle\alpha;\sum_{\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{n\}},

where ρ\rho (resp. Οƒ\sigma) ranges over all elements of π’ž{\mathscr{C}} of dimension nβˆ’1n-1 (resp. nn). Suppose now that βˆ‘ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,ΟƒβˆˆNρ\sum_{\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\in N_{\rho} for some nβˆ’1n-1-dimensional Οβˆˆπ’ž\rho\in{\mathscr{C}}. Recall that we may view Ξ±\alpha as a multilinear map Nℝ2​nβˆ’1β†’Cβˆžβ€‹(Nℝ)N_{{\mathbb{R}}}^{2n-1}\rightarrow C^{\infty}(N_{\mathbb{R}}) which is alternating in the first nβˆ’1n-1 arguments and also alternating in the last nn arguments. But an alternating nn-linear map on a vector space of dimension nβˆ’1n-1 is zero and hence the restriction of ⟨α;βˆ‘ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,ΟƒβŸ©{n}\langle\alpha;\sum_{\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{n\}} to ρ\rho is zero. Then the above display proves (a) β‡’\Rightarrow (b).

Conversely, if βˆ‘ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,Οƒβˆ‰Nρ\sum_{\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\not\in N_{\rho} for some nβˆ’1n-1-dimensional Οβˆˆπ’ž\rho\in{\mathscr{C}} , then there is an α∈Acnβˆ’1,n​(Nℝ)\alpha\in A_{c}^{n-1,n}(N_{\mathbb{R}}) such that the restriction of ⟨α;βˆ‘ΟƒβŠƒΟmσ​ωρ,ΟƒβŸ©{n}\langle\alpha;\sum_{\sigma\supset\rho}m_{\sigma}\omega_{\rho,\sigma}\rangle_{\{n\}} to ρ\rho is non-zero. We may also assume that the support of Ξ±\alpha is disjoint from all other nβˆ’1n-1-dimensional polyhedra of π’ž{\mathscr{C}}. Then the above display proves (b) β‡’\Rightarrow (a). The equivalence of (a) and (c) is shown similarly. β–‘\square

3.9

Now let F:Nℝ′→NℝF:N_{\mathbb{R}}^{\prime}\rightarrow N_{\mathbb{R}} be an affine map whose underlying linear map is integral, i.e. induced by a homomorphism Nβ€²β†’NN^{\prime}\rightarrow N. We will define the push-forward of a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex (π’žβ€²,m)({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m) of pure dimension nn on Nℝ′N_{\mathbb{R}}^{\prime}. For details, we refer to [AR10], Β§7. After a subdivision of π’žβ€²{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}, we may assume that

Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²):={F⁑(Οƒβ€²)βˆ£Οƒβ€²Β is a face ofΒ Ξ½β€²βˆˆπ’žβ€²Β withΒ dim(F⁑(Ξ½β€²))=n}F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}):=\{F(\sigma^{\prime})\mid\text{$\sigma^{\prime}$ is a face of $\nu^{\prime}\in{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}$ with $\dim(F(\nu^{\prime}))=n$}\}

is a polyhedral complex in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. We define the multiplicity of an nn-dimensional F⁑(Οƒβ€²)∈Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²)F(\sigma^{\prime})\in F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}) by

mF⁑(Οƒβ€²):=βˆ‘Ξ½β€²βˆˆπ’žnβ€²,Ξ½β€²βŠ‚Fβˆ’1​(F⁑(Οƒβ€²))[NΞ½β€²β€²:NF⁑(Οƒβ€²)]mΞ½β€².m_{F(\sigma^{\prime})}:=\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\in{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}_{n},\,\nu^{\prime}\subset F^{-1}(F(\sigma^{\prime}))}[N_{\nu^{\prime}}^{\prime}:N_{F(\sigma^{\prime})}]m_{\nu^{\prime}}.

Endowed with these multiplicities, we get a weighted integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedral complex Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²,m)F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m) of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. If (π’žβ€²,m)({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m) is a tropical cycle, then Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²,m)F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m) is also a tropical cycle. It might happen that Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²,m)F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m) is empty, then we get the tropical zero cycle.

Proposition 3.10 (projection formula)

Using the assumptions above and α∈Acn,n​(Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²))\alpha\in A_{c}^{n,n}(F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime})), we have ∫Fβˆ—β€‹(π’žβ€²,m)Ξ±=∫(π’žβ€²,m)Fβˆ—β€‹(Ξ±)\int_{F_{*}({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m)}\alpha=\int_{({\mathscr{C}}^{\prime},m)}F^{*}(\alpha).

Proof: Let Οƒβ€²\sigma^{\prime} be an nn-dimensional polyhedron of π’žβ€²{\mathscr{C}}^{\prime}. Then Οƒ:=F⁑(Οƒβ€²)\sigma:=F(\sigma^{\prime}) is an integral ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-affine polyhedron in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. We assume for the moment that Οƒ\sigma is also nn-dimensional. As above, we consider the lattice NΟƒ:=Nβˆ©π•ƒΟƒN_{\sigma}:=N\cap{\mathbb{L}}_{\sigma} in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}, where 𝕃σ{\mathbb{L}}_{\sigma} is the linear space which is a translate of the affine space generated by Οƒ\sigma. Let AA be the matrix of the homomorphism F:NΟƒβ€²β†’NΟƒF:N_{\sigma^{\prime}}\rightarrow N_{\sigma} with respect to integral bases. Then we have |det(A)|=[NΟƒβ€²:NΟƒ]|\det(A)|=[N_{\sigma^{\prime}}:N_{\sigma}] and hence the transformation formula (1) shows

βˆ«Οƒβ€²Fβˆ—Ξ±=[NΟƒβ€²:NΟƒ]βˆ«ΟƒΞ±.\int_{\sigma^{\prime}}F^{*}\alpha=[N_{\sigma^{\prime}}:N_{\sigma}]\int_{\sigma}\alpha. (2)

If dim(Οƒ)<n\dim(\sigma)<n, then both sides are zero and hence formula (2) is true in any case. Using the weighted sum over all Οƒβ€²\sigma^{\prime}, the claim follows immediately from (2). β–‘\square

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.