3 Superforms on polyhedral complexes [0354]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
3 Superforms on polyhedral complexes
We keep the notions from the previous section and we will extend them to the setting of polyhedral complexes. We will introduce tropical cycles and we will characterize them as closed currents of integrations over weighted integral -affine polyhedral complexes.
3.1
A polyhedral complex in is a finite set of polyhedra with the following two properties: Every polyhedron in has all its closed faces in . If , then is a closed face of and . Note here that the empty set and also are allowed as closed faces of a polyhedron (see [Gu12], Appendix A, for details).
A polyhedral complex is called integral -affine for a subgroup of if every polyhedron of is integral -affine. The support of is the union of all polyhedra in . The polyhedral complex is called pure dimensional of dimension if every maximal polyhedron in has dimension . We will often use the notation for .
3.2
Let be a polyhedral complex in . A superform on is the restriction of a superform on (an open subset of) to . This means that two superforms agree if their restrictions to any polyhedron of agree. Let be the space of superforms on . It is an alternating algebra with respect to the induced wedge product. We have also differential operators , and on given by restriction of the corresponding operators on . Let be the space of -superforms on . The support of is the complement of in . We denote by the subspace of of superforms of compact support.
Let be a free abelian group of rank and let be an affine map. Suppose that is a polyhedral complex of with , then the pull-back in 2.3 induces a pull-back .
3.3
A polyhedral complex subdivides the polyhedral complex if they have the same support and if every polyhedron of is contained in a polyhedron of . In this case, we say that is a subdivision of . All our constructions here will be compatible with subdivisions. This is no problem for the definition of superforms on as they depend only on the support .
A weight on a pure dimensional polyhedral complex is a function which assigns to every maximal polyhedron a number . Then we get a canonical weight on every subdivision of . For a weighted polyhedral complex , only the polyhedra which are contained in a maximal dimensional with are of interest. They form a subcomplex of and we define the support of as the support of . The polyhedra of will usually be neglected.
3.4
Let be a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension . For , we set
where we use integration from 2.4 on the right. We define integrals over the boundary of for a superform in or in by
where we use the boundary integrals from 2.8 on the right. Note that the boundary may be defined as the subcomplex consisting of the polyhedra of dimension at most , but there is no canonical weight on . Indeed, the boundary integral depends on the relative situation because of the weight and the contraction with respect to the vectors used in the definitions. This is similar to the situation in real analysis where boundary integrals depend on the relative orientation. These classical boundary integrals do depend only on the restriction of the differential form to the boundary which is clearly wrong for our boundary integrals. However, it is still true that if the support of is disjoint from .
Proposition 3.5 (Stokesβ formula)
Let be a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension . For any and any , we have
Proof: This follows immediately from Stokesβ formula for polyhedra given in Proposition 2.9.
Example 3.6
If is a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension , then we get a supercurrent by setting for any .
3.7
A weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension is called a tropical cycle if its weight satisfies the following balancing condition: For every -dimensional , we have
Here, is the canonical lattice contained in the affine space generated by and is the lattice vector pointing outwards of (see 2.8). Tropical cycles are the basic objects in tropical geometry.
Proposition 3.8
Let be a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension on . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (a)
is a tropical cycle;
- (b)
is a -closed supercurrent on ;
- (c)
is a -closed supercurrent on .
Proof: Let . By Stokesβ formula in Proposition 3.5, we have
where (resp. ) ranges over all elements of of dimension (resp. ). Suppose now that for some -dimensional . Recall that we may view as a multilinear map which is alternating in the first arguments and also alternating in the last arguments. But an alternating -linear map on a vector space of dimension is zero and hence the restriction of to is zero. Then the above display proves (a) (b).
Conversely, if for some -dimensional , then there is an such that the restriction of to is non-zero. We may also assume that the support of is disjoint from all other -dimensional polyhedra of . Then the above display proves (b) (a). The equivalence of (a) and (c) is shown similarly.
3.9
Now let be an affine map whose underlying linear map is integral, i.e. induced by a homomorphism . We will define the push-forward of a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of pure dimension on . For details, we refer to [AR10], Β§7. After a subdivision of , we may assume that
is a polyhedral complex in . We define the multiplicity of an -dimensional by
Endowed with these multiplicities, we get a weighted integral -affine polyhedral complex of . If is a tropical cycle, then is also a tropical cycle. It might happen that is empty, then we get the tropical zero cycle.
Proposition 3.10 (projection formula)
Using the assumptions above and , we have .
Proof: Let be an -dimensional polyhedron of . Then is an integral -affine polyhedron in . We assume for the moment that is also -dimensional. As above, we consider the lattice in , where is the linear space which is a translate of the affine space generated by . Let be the matrix of the homomorphism with respect to integral bases. Then we have and hence the transformation formula (1) shows
| (2) |
If , then both sides are zero and hence formula (2) is true in any case. Using the weighted sum over all , the claim follows immediately from (2).