ScalingStacks

3.1. The Gibbons–Hawking ansatz [02GV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.1. The Gibbons–Hawking ansatz

The Gibbons–Hawking ansatz describes 44–dimensional hyperkähler metrics with an isometric S1S^{1}–action that also preserves the whole hyperkähler structure. Such an S1S^{1} action is therefore called triholomorphic.

Let UU be an open set of ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3} and π:P→U\pi\colon\thinspace P\rightarrow U be a principal U⁡(1)U(1)–bundle. Suppose that there exists a positive harmonic function hh on UU such that ∗d​h\ast dh is the curvature d​θd\theta of a connection θ\theta on PP. Then

(3.3a) ggh=h​π∗​gℝ3+h−1​θ2g^{\textup{gh}}=h\,\pi^{\ast}g_{\mathbb{R}^{3}}+h^{-1}\theta^{2}
is a hyperkähler metric. Indeed, we can exhibit an explicit hyperkähler triple 𝝎¯gh\bm{\underline{\omega}}^{\textup{gh}} that induces the metric gghg^{\textup{gh}}. Fix coordinates (x1,x2,x3)(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}) on U⊂ℝ3U\subset\mathbb{R}^{3} and define
(3.3b) ωigh=d​xi∧θ+h​d​xj∧d​xk.\omega^{\textup{gh}}_{i}=dx_{i}\wedge\theta+h\,dx_{j}\wedge dx_{k}.

Here and in the rest of the paper we use the convention that for every i=1,2,3i=1,2,3 the indices j,kj,k are chosen so that ϵi​j​k=1\epsilon_{ijk}=1. One can check explicitly that 𝝎¯g​h\bm{\underline{\omega}}^{gh} defines an S​U​(2)SU(2)–structure and it induces the Riemannian metric gg​hg^{gh}. Moreover, the requirement that 𝝎¯g​h\bm{\underline{\omega}}^{gh} is also closed is equivalent to the abelian monopole equation

(3.4) ∗d​h=d​θ\ast dh=d\theta

The fibre-wise circle action on PP preserves 𝝎¯gh\bm{\underline{\omega}}^{\textup{gh}} and π\pi is nothing but a hyperkähler moment map for this action. Conversely, every 44–dimensional hyperkähler metric with a triholomorphic circle action is described by (3.3).

The basic example of the Gibbons–Hawking construction is given in terms of so-called Dirac monopoles on ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3}. Fix a set of distinct points p1,…,pnp_{1},\dots,p_{n} in ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3} and consider the harmonic function

h=λ+∑j=1nkj2​|x−pj|,h=\lambda+\sum_{j=1}^{n}{\frac{k_{j}}{2|x-p_{j}|}},

where λ>0\lambda>0 and k1,…,knk_{1},\dots,k_{n} are constants. Since ℝ3∖{p1,…,pn}\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\{p_{1},\dots,p_{n}\} has non-trivial second homology, we must require kj∈ℤk_{j}\in\mathbb{Z} for all jj in order to be able to solve (3.4). If these integrality constraints are satisfied then ∗d​h\ast dh defines the curvature d​θd\theta of a connection θ\theta (unique up to gauge transformations) on a principal U⁡(1)U(1)–bundle PP over ℝ3∖{p1,…,pn}\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\{p_{1},\dots,p_{n}\} which restricts to the principal U⁡(1)U(1)–bundle associated with the line bundle 𝒪⁡(kj)→S2\mathcal{O}(k_{j})\rightarrow S^{2} on a small punctured neighbourhood of pjp_{j}. The pair (h,θ)(h,\theta) is a solution of (3.4) which we call a Dirac monopole with singularities at p1,…,pnp_{1},\dots,p_{n}.

The Gibbons–Hawking ansatz (3.3) associates a hyperkähler metric gghg^{\textup{gh}} to every Dirac monopole on the open set where h>0h>0. When kj>0k_{j}>0 then gghg^{\textup{gh}} is certainly defined on the restriction of PP to a small punctured neighbourhood of pjp_{j}. By a change of variables one can check that gg​hg^{gh} can be extended to a smooth (orbifold) metric modelled on ℂ2/ℤkj\mathbb{C}^{2}/\mathbb{Z}_{k_{j}} by adding a single point. In particular gghg^{\textup{gh}} is a complete metric whenever λ≥0\lambda\geq 0 and kj=1k_{j}=1 for all j=1,…,nj=1,\dots,n. One can check that gghg^{\textup{gh}} is an ALE metric when λ=0\lambda=0 and an ALF metric of cyclic type when λ>0\lambda>0. Note also that when λ>0\lambda>0 we can always rescale the metric so that λ=1\lambda=1.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.