ScalingStacks

6.2. Weighted Hölder spaces [02HV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

6.2. Weighted Hölder spaces

We work on the Riemannian 44–manifold (Mϵ,gϵ)(M_{\epsilon},g_{\epsilon}) constructed in Section 5. The aim of this subsection is to introduce weighted Hölder spaces and prove a weighted Schauder estimate for the operator D=d∗+2​d+D=d^{\ast}+2\,d^{+} associated with the metric gϵg_{\epsilon}.

For R0R_{0} sufficiently large and ϵ=ϵ⁡(R0)\epsilon=\epsilon(R_{0}) sufficiently small we define a weight function ρϵ\rho_{\epsilon} as follows: we set

(6.7) ρϵ={ϵif ​ρj≤R0​ϵ,ρjif ​2​R0​ϵ≤ρj≤ρ0,ϵif ​ρi≤R0​ϵ,ρiif ​2​R0​ϵ≤ρi≤ρ0,1if ​ρj,ρi≥2​ρ0​ for all ​j=1,…,8,i=1,…,n,\rho_{\epsilon}=\begin{cases}\epsilon&\mbox{if }\rho_{j}\leq R_{0}\epsilon,\\ \rho_{j}&\mbox{if }2R_{0}\epsilon\leq\rho_{j}\leq\rho_{0},\\ \epsilon&\mbox{if }\rho_{i}\leq R_{0}\epsilon,\\ \rho_{i}&\mbox{if }2R_{0}\epsilon\leq\rho_{i}\leq\rho_{0},\\ 1&\mbox{if }\rho_{j},\rho_{i}\geq 2\rho_{0}\mbox{ for all }j=1,\dots,8,i=1,\dots,n,\end{cases}

and let ρϵ\rho_{\epsilon} interpolate smoothly and monotonically between the various regions. By abuse of notation we think of ρϵ\rho_{\epsilon} as defined both on MϵM_{\epsilon} and on MϵghM^{\textup{gh}}_{\epsilon} or its double cover P|𝒰ϵP|_{\mathcal{U}_{\epsilon}}.

Definition 6.8.

For each δ∈ℝ\delta\in\mathbb{R}, k∈ℤ≥0k\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} and α∈(0,1)\alpha\in(0,1) define the weighted Hölder norm Cδk,αC^{k,\alpha}_{\delta} by

‖a‖Cδk,α=∑j=1k‖ρϵ−δ+j​∇ja‖C0+supd⁡(x,y)<inj​gϵ​min⁡{ρϵ​(x)−δ+k+α,ρϵ​(y)−δ+k+α}​|∇ka​(x)−∇ka​(y)||x−y|α.\|a\|_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}}=\sum_{j=1}^{k}{\|\rho_{\epsilon}^{-\delta+j}\nabla^{j}a\|_{C^{0}}}+\text{sup}_{d(x,y)<\text{inj}\,g_{\epsilon}}{\min{\left\{\rho_{\epsilon}(x)^{-\delta+k+\alpha},\rho_{\epsilon}(y)^{-\delta+k+\alpha}\right\}}\frac{|\nabla^{k}a(x)-\nabla^{k}a(y)|}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}}.

Here all norms and covariant derivatives are computed with respect to the metric gϵg_{\epsilon} and ∇ka​(x)\nabla^{k}a(x) and ∇ka​(y)\nabla^{k}a(y) are compared using parallel transport along the unique geodesic connecting xx and yy. Similarly set ‖a‖Cδ0=‖ρ−δ​a‖C0\|a\|_{C^{0}_{\delta}}=\|\rho^{-\delta}a\|_{C^{0}}.

The following simple estimate for products in Cδ−10,αC^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1} will be used to control the non-linearities.

Lemma 6.9.

For every δ<1\delta<1 there exists a constant C>0C>0 independent of ϵ\epsilon such that

‖u​v‖Cδ−10,α≤C​ϵδ−1​‖u‖Cδ−10,α​‖v‖Cδ−10,α.\|u\,v\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}\leq C\epsilon^{\delta-1}\|u\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}\|v\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}.
Proof.

From the definition of the Cδ−10,αC^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}–norm it is immediate to check that

‖u​v‖Cδ−10,α≤C​‖ρϵδ−1‖C0​‖u‖Cδ−10,α​‖v‖Cδ−10,α.\|u\,v\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}\leq C\|\rho_{\epsilon}^{\delta-1}\|_{C^{0}}\|u\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}\|v\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}.

Since ρϵ≥c​ϵ\rho_{\epsilon}\geq c\,\epsilon and δ−1<0\delta-1<0 the result follows. ∎

We now consider the operator D=d∗+2​d+D=d^{\ast}+2\,d^{+} acting on 11–forms of class Cδ1,αC^{1,\alpha}_{\delta}. We prove the following weighted Schauder estimate.

Proposition 6.10.

For every δ∈ℝ\delta\in\mathbb{R} there exists a constant C>0C>0 independent of ϵ\epsilon such that

‖a‖Cδ1,α≤C⁡(‖D​a‖Cδ−10,α+‖a‖Cδ0).\|a\|_{C^{1,\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq C\left(\|Da\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}}+\|a\|_{C^{0}_{\delta}}\right).
Proof.

In order to prove this estimate it is convenient to cut the manifold MϵM_{\epsilon} in various pieces and analyse the geometry separately in each of them. The global estimate follows by combining the “local” estimates obtained in each of these pieces.

Consider first the region ρj≤2​R0​ϵ\rho_{j}\leq 2R_{0}\epsilon for some j=1,…,8j=1,\dots,8. The rescaled metric ϵ−2​gϵ\epsilon^{-2}g_{\epsilon} is isometric to a compact region in the DmjD_{m_{j}} ALF space (Mj,gMj)(M_{j},g_{M_{j}}).

Now, given a 11–form aa on MϵM_{\epsilon}, restrict aa to the region ρj≤2​R0​ϵ\rho_{j}\leq 2R_{0}\epsilon and define a~=ϵ−1−δ​a\tilde{a}=\epsilon^{-1-\delta}a. The standard Schauder estimate for the elliptic operator DD associated with the metric gMjg_{M_{j}} is

‖a~‖C1,α≤C⁡(‖D​a~‖C0,α+‖a~‖C0).\|\tilde{a}\|_{C^{1,\alpha}}\leq C\left(\|D\tilde{a}\|_{C^{0,\alpha}}+\|\tilde{a}\|_{C^{0}}\right).

Since |a~|ϵ−2​gϵ=ϵ−δ​|a|gϵ|\tilde{a}|_{\epsilon^{-2}g_{\epsilon}}=\epsilon^{-\delta}|a|_{g_{\epsilon}} and the norms ∇a~\nabla\tilde{a} and D​a~D\tilde{a} are related in a similar way to those of ∇a\nabla a and D​aDa, the weighted Schauder estimate follows immediately.

The same argument can be applied in the region ρi≤2​R0​ϵ\rho_{i}\leq 2R_{0}\epsilon: the role of MjM_{j} is now played by a small perturbation (cf. the beginning of Section 5.2) of the Aki−1A_{k_{i}-1} ALF space NiN_{i}.

Consider now the transition region R0​ϵ≤ρj≤ρ0R_{0}\,\epsilon\leq\rho_{j}\leq\rho_{0} for some j=1,…,8j=1,\dots,8. We can work on the double cover H2​mj−4H^{2m_{j}-4} and restrict to ℤ2\mathbb{Z}_{2}–invariant forms. Scaling by ϵ\epsilon as above we reduce to consider the restriction of H2​mj−4H^{2m_{j}-4} to the region R0≤ρ≤ρ0ϵR_{0}\leq\rho\leq\frac{\rho_{0}}{\epsilon} in ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3} endowed with a metric

g=(1+ϵ​λj+mj−2ρ)​gℝ3+(1+ϵ​λj+mj−2ρ)−1​θ2+O⁡(ρ−3)+O⁡(ϵ3​ρ2).g=\left(1+\epsilon\lambda_{j}+\frac{m_{j}-2}{\rho}\right)g_{\mathbb{R}^{3}}+\left(1+\epsilon\lambda_{j}+\frac{m_{j}-2}{\rho}\right)^{-1}\theta^{2}+O(\rho^{-3})+O(\epsilon^{3}\rho^{2}).

Moreover, after rescaling the weight function ρϵ\rho_{\epsilon} coincides with the radial function ρ\rho on ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3}.

Fix a number σ∈(0,1)\sigma\in(0,1). For each point xx let π⁡(x)\pi(x) be its image in ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3} and set R=σ​ρ​(x)R=\sigma\rho(x). Up to changing R0R_{0} and ρ0\rho_{0} into (1−σ)​R0(1-\sigma)R_{0} and (1+σ)​ρ0(1+\sigma)\rho_{0} we can assume that BR​(π​(x))B_{R}(\pi(x)) is contained in the annulus R0≤ρ≤ρ0ϵR_{0}\leq\rho\leq\frac{\rho_{0}}{\epsilon} and that the restriction of H2​mj−4H^{2m_{j}-4} to this ball is trivial. We can then work on a “square” BR×[−R,R]B_{R}\times[-R,R] in the universal cover of H2​mj−4|BRH^{2m_{j}-4}|_{B_{R}}. Rescaling the metric by R−2R^{-2}, applying standard Schauder estimates, rescaling back and multiplying by R−δR^{-\delta} we obtain

‖a‖Cδ1,α​(BR)≤C⁡(‖D​a‖Cδ−10,α​(BR)+‖a‖Cδ0​(BR)).\|a\|_{C^{1,\alpha}_{\delta}(B_{R})}\leq C\left(\|Da\|_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta-1}(B_{R})}+\|a\|_{C^{0}_{\delta}(B_{R})}\right).

The case of the region R0​ϵ≤ρi≤ρ0R_{0}\epsilon\leq\rho_{i}\leq\rho_{0} is completely analogous.

Finally, in the region where ρj,ρi≥12​ρ0\rho_{j},\rho_{i}\geq\tfrac{1}{2}\rho_{0} the weight function ρϵ\rho_{\epsilon} is uniformly equivalent to the constant 11 and therefore weighted spaces coincide with standard Hölder spaces. Moreover the harmonic function hϵh_{\epsilon} is C∞C^{\infty}–close to the constant 11. The metric gϵg_{\epsilon} is therefore C∞C^{\infty}–close to the metric g∞=g𝕋+ϵ2​θ2g_{\infty}=g_{\mathbb{T}}+\epsilon^{2}\theta^{2}. The Schauder estimate for forms supported in this region is immediate since we can restrict to small balls in the torus 𝕋\mathbb{T} on which the circle bundle PP is trivial and then work on the universal cover, which has bounded geometry. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.