6.1. Monge-Ampère equations on normal Kähler spaces [02F6]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
6.1. Monge-Ampère equations on normal Kähler spaces
Let be a smooth Kähler metric on . A classical result of P. Lelong states that if is relatively compact in , then is of finite volume with respect to the smooth volume form .
This has been generalized by E.Bedford and A.Taylor in [BT], where the authors study Monge-Ampère measures for locally bounded psh functions. Since these measures do not charge proper analytic subsets, we obtain:
Proposition 6.1.
Let be a semi-Kähler current with potentials on . The Monge-Ampère measure is well defined on and satisfies
For any resolution , the Monge-Ampère measure is well defined on and satisfies . Moreover if is a resolution dominating (i.e. for some bimeromorphic proper holomorphic map ), then .
The measure is thus well defined on and independent of the choice of resolution. We will call it the Monge-Ampère measure of and denote it by . The mass of this measure only depends on the cohomology class of , as follows again from [BT]:
Lemma 6.2.
Assume is compact. Let two semi Kähler currents with potentiel on . If they are cohomologous, i.e. for some , then .
We can now reformulate some of our previous results.
Theorem 6.3.
Let be a -dimensional compact normal Kähler space and be a smooth Kähler form on . Then for every , , such that , there is a unique such that
Proof.
Let be a resolution of . We may define a semipositive big smooth form on by . By Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 3.1 we can solve uniquely where is a continuous function on such that is semipositive. Let be a fiber of and the inclusion map. is connected by Zariski’s main theorem. Furthermore is semipositive on . Since , it follows that is a continuous psh function on . Hence is constant. This implies that where is a continuous function on . We do have . ∎